• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job[W: 104, 181]

Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

:shock:

You are unique Danbury.

HOw is my noting that YOU made a big deal about my not knowing your gender in response to your saying you don't care about the gender issue my being unique?

I think you don't like being called out on your nonsense. However, that is not unique. The cure, though, is to not spout nonsense in the first place, like that anything YOU decided is liberal is liberal and is therefore not credible.

that is nonsense. Just as it would be nonsense if I said that, just because Rush Limbaugh walked by the offices of the Weekly Standard one day, AND that the Weekly Standard is conservative, those two things MEAN it's not credible.

Those are NOT things that make something credible or not.

You still don't seem to get that.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

HOw is my noting that YOU made a big deal about my not knowing your gender in response to your saying you don't care about the gender issue my being unique?

I think you don't like being called out on your nonsense. However, that is not unique. The cure, though, is to not spout nonsense in the first place, like that anything YOU decided is liberal is liberal and is therefore not credible.

that is nonsense. Just as it would be nonsense if I said that, just because Rush Limbaugh walked by the offices of the Weekly Standard one day, AND that the Weekly Standard is conservative, those two things MEAN it's not credible.

Those are NOT things that make something credible or not.

You still don't seem to get that.

:shock:

As I wrote before, you are unique Danbury.

If you could read without the influence of the bias your rewarded for, you'd find I pointed out "fact checkers" are biased, not just "factcheck.org".

Sorry, but you can cling to Wallis Annenberg's progressive propoganda all you want. Rational people will do their own research if the point is important enough.

You should try it sometime.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

:shock:

As I wrote before, you are unique Danbury.

If you could read without the influence of the bias your rewarded for, you'd find I pointed out "fact checkers" are biased, not just "factcheck.org".

Sorry, but you can cling to Wallis Annenberg's progressive propoganda all you want. Rational people will do their own research if the point is important enough.

You should try it sometime.

Well, nice try, but no, you were referring specifically to factcheck.org, hence your nonsense about Soros and Annenberg.

I thought you 'Pubs were supposed to be about moral character and personal responsiblity.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

:shock:

As I wrote before, you are unique Danbury.



Sorry, but you can cling to Wallis Annenberg's progressive propoganda all you want. Rational people will do their own research if the point is important enough.

You should try it sometime.

what progressive propaganda are you referring to?
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Well, nice try, but no, you were referring specifically to factcheck.org, hence your nonsense about Soros and Annenberg.

I thought you 'Pubs were supposed to be about moral character and personal responsiblity.


:shock:

It's possible Webster's will one day recognize "Danburyizm" as a legitimate word, explaining it to mean butterfly effect, bouncing off the walls responses to very simple and clear statements.

You originally claimed Newsbusters was not legitimate because of it's conservative affiliations. I mearly pointed out factcheck.org was owned and operated by one of the most Progressive organizations in the country and was biased in their analysis.

I can't help with the insanity you want to keep applying to the situation, and frankly, I think enough has been written, considering this thread is about the lame obnoxious statements of Pelosi.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

:shock:

As I wrote before, you are unique Danbury.

If you could read without the influence of the bias your rewarded for, you'd find I pointed out "fact checkers" are biased, not just "factcheck.org".

False:
You are aware factcheck.org is the brainchild of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, an operation that partners with George Soros and his Progressive Machine? Why is it not surprising your attached to it?
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

:shock:



You originally claimed Newsbusters was not legitimate because of it's conservative affiliations.

False. I said I trusted factcheck.org over newsbusters. I never said why.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Yes, yes, but WHAT? And why can't you say?

Because I like watching your words spilling out across the screen in demanding outrage.

Why do you ignore the obvious political agenda of the radical Progressive sites you attach yourself to? While I understand your need to follow their teachings, why would you think non-believers should have to?
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

It that the new Progressive reality? Newsbusters is GOP so it's biased. factcheck is owned by one of the more radical progressive operations in the U.S. and it's reliable and professional. :lamo

Sorry Danbury, no soup for you.


No, Ocean. YOU said Newsbusters is GOP. then you went on, again, about factcheck.org and Annenberg,, NOT "factcheckers" in general.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Uh huh.

Sorry, just 'cause you say so, doesn't make it so Danbury.

FactCheck.org | A Project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center


Progressive Reality = We pay for the facts we require you to know.


Still seeing references to ONLY factcheck.org and Annenberg, NOT to "fact checkers in general".
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

This will be fun. As usual, you blaze off on some curious trajectory completly unrelated to the point.

You claim factcheck is professional because, well, you say so. It's owned and operated by one of the most liberal/progressive organizations in the United States. That's a fact. Of course, newbusters isn't owned and operated by one of the most liberal/progressive organizations in the United States, so it isn't professional.

See how that works?

Progressives = Creating a new reality, one website at a time.

AND still, just factcheck.org and Annenberg
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Typical Progressive. "I want"

Danbury, Danbury.

I can't state the facts any better than I have. Factcheck.org is owned and operated by Annenberg, one of the most biased political agenda driven organizations operating in the United States today. It ranks with, and partners with the Tides foundation, Ford Foundation, the Democracy Alliance, etc., etc.. You know this to be an absolute fact.

Your attempt to deny this is really rather interesting.

The fact is factcheckers are biased. How many articles have been written about this fact?

Should I post a link to one?

Still about factcheck.org and Annenberg. Although at the end you do say "factcheckers are biased". That's when Iasked for your source, the source you provided said Factcheck.org is NOT slanted left.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Because I like watching your words spilling out across the screen in demanding outrage.

Why do you ignore the obvious political agenda of the radical Progressive sites you attach yourself to? While I understand your need to follow their teachings, why would you think non-believers should have to?

Still no examples.

Look, here's another tip: If you're going to make a claim, be sure you can back it up.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Danburyizm #128,432.

If a Danburyizm is Danbury telling the truth, then sure:

Well, of course, when you can't argue the facts, shoot the messenger.

Factcheck.org v. Newbusters?? I think that, yes, I'll go with factcheck.org. Btw, factcheck explains WHY it's wrong.
.

Feel free to tell me where in there you see me saying "...because newsbusters is conservative, I don't trust it."

I'll wait.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Okay Ocean, let's try it this way:

Why don't you provide the EVIDENCE you have that Factcheck is not credible. And yes, feel free to start by showing the evidence you have that Annenberg is not credible. Name association is NOT evidence, btw. that is EMOTIVE, but it's not evidence. I'm recovering from an injury and can't do much, so I've got all day to hear your evidence, or wait for it, which I suspect is going to happen. Sigh.

"Only a con man tries to get you to ignore other sources and only listen to what they have to say. "
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Oh, and BTW Danbury, so called "centrist".... The OP was from "the Hill" not Newsbusters, as you continually try to insinuate....Hmmmm, red herrings, and outright fabrications from you, no wonder you like FactCheck.org.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Still no examples.

Look, here's another tip: If you're going to make a claim, be sure you can back it up.


:lamo

As I wrote before:

"Because I like watching your words spilling out across the screen in demanding outrage."
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

:lamo

As I wrote before:

"Because I like watching your words spilling out across the screen in demanding outrage."

Translation: "I can't back up what I say."

Didn't think you could, Ocean. But it's poor form.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

If a Danburyizm is Danbury telling the truth, then sure:



Feel free to tell me where in there you see me saying "...because newsbusters is conservative, I don't trust it."

I'll wait.

Of course you won't. And then you'll just slink way, as you have done for years.

It's kind of the reason your reputation is what it is, and "Danburyizm" has been used both here, and on other sites you live on.


BTW, post #52 Danbury...............

"Btw, you DID rely on a conservative Web site for you Pelosi info., ie: Newsbusters. Just pointing out the irony to you. Anyway, the story is false. But I'm also very aware that in Republican "We create reality now" world, "true" and "false" are very subjective terms. "If we like it, it's true. If we don't, it's false.""
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Translation: "I can't back up what I say."

Didn't think you could, Ocean. But it's poor form.

Oh, I can very much back up everything I post. Otherwise I wouldn't post it Danbury.

Surely you should know that after all these years.
 
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job

Of course you won't. And then you'll just slink way, as you have done for years.

It's kind of the reason your reputation is what it is, and "Danburyizm" has been used both here, and on other sites you live on.


BTW, post #52 Danbury...............

"Btw, you DID rely on a conservative Web site for you Pelosi info., ie: Newsbusters. Just pointing out the irony to you. Anyway, the story is false. But I'm also very aware that in Republican "We create reality now" world, "true" and "false" are very subjective terms. "If we like it, it's true. If we don't, it's false.""

First of all, YOU have slinked away the last two days, not I.

Second, YOU said Newsbusters is a GOP site, not I.

Third, saying Newsbusters is a conservative site is NOT the same thing as saying it is not reliable BECAUSE it's conservative. AndI was noting it is conservative NOT in the context of its reliability as a source but to point out YOUR hypocrisy in declaiming sites for being liberal.

Get it?

Cripes, Ocean. Give it up.
 
Back
Top Bottom