eh?There was no multiplier effect with Obama's Stimulus and there was no "Infrastructure Spending" really associated with it, despite Obama's promises”
Tell that to the 1.45 million people who are working as a direct result of the $80 billion auto bailout.
But of course you knew that, when you attempted to deflect to the “non-partisan stimulus “rather than addressing the economic advantages of the multiplier effects of increasing minimum wages 25%.
That's understandable in a somewhat draconian way when you realize that the only way republicans (The party who is against economically struggling Americans) can get elected,on a national level in the 21st century is with lies and voter suppression.
The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say
Current Report: Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances of the United States Government (Combined Statement): Publications & Guidance: Financial Management Service
Line items in the budget and amount spent vs preceeding years. Obama claimed 2.5 trillion in cuts. Where are they?