He has supported them as his own for 16 years now, and the girls had no part in their mother's reprehensible actions in the marriage, so why should that support stop?Not only is he having to pay child support for them...
How so? I am not aware of any alimony being awarded her in this case, we are talking about support for the children.but his wife is being rewarded for adultery.
Not all women are this woman.This is why I tell all the young guys I know are still single to stay single.
Maybe, and I don't know how Canadian courts are ruling, but here in the US, more, and more men are winning in these cases.This is the kind of thing that comes out of the misandric society we now live in.
We don't incarcerate people for adultery, so I don't know what you mean by "having the book thrown at him"...If the tables were turned and it was found that the man had cheated during his marriage no matter the circumstances, the man would have the book thrown at him.
Again, support is for the children, so how is she being rewarded?But this woman cheated on her husband and she is being rewarded with it.
Don't know that, but if he has not been in their lives at all, and not shown to have anything to do with them other than donating the sperm, then what does he matter?Where is the man that she had these other kids with?
Up to this point in their lives, they were not another man's kids, they were his in every way, including support. Now because he got hurt in this, you want him to be able to shirk that?Why is the man that was cheated on having to pay for another mans kids?
She is. Otherwise we wouldn't know about her affairs. I think most rational people would surmise that her actions in the marriage were reprehensible.Why is this woman not being scrutinized?
We don't punish son's in this country for the sins of the father, and likewise, these girls shouldn't be punished for the actions of their mother.