• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

You and Verax seem incapable of presenting proof to support the Science of AGW.

You both are careful to post emoticons.

I suppose you use what you have.

It appears you have reading issues. Our claims have been fully supported.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W

Not nearly as funny as accepting peer review in only the scientific disciplines that happen to agree with your pre-formed conclusions.



Scientific being the key word here.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

You say that because your biases won't allow you to see clearly. Have you every wondered why everything that contradicts you is biased or corrupt. Ever consider it's yourlogic and bias is the problem.



I'm still waiting for that link to the science organization that has classified AGW as a Scientific Theory.

Could you please provide that for me?
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Common sense is a part of science, but is not proof of anything.

Where is your proof that the stuff the forms the basis of AGW Science is anything more than a set of possibilities that may or may not be right?

You guys are a trip I'll give you that. Your logic is so strange, it challenges the very basis of fundamental abstract principles and thinking. I dunno man... what if... what if EVERYTHING is wrong? What if... what if all books are wrong? What if what they teach you in school isn't real? What if the number systems are broken? What if counting from 1 to 100 is a trick... what if a number is missing? What if progressives steal money from you because you don't know about the missing number?

I don't know man... you have to trust something. Isn't centuries of the scientific method the best candidate of something to trust? If we can't trust the best science we have, what are we supposed to trust? Certainly its better than trusting an oil industry CEO, right? No source is 100%, no science is 100%, its all a best guess. This is again, basic science 101 which you should know.

It seems like you're just trying to make everything a wash. You counter that your bad source can't be trusted so you turn it around and say ok well, NOTHING can be trusted then. EVERYTHING is corrupt, everything is broken, everything is a fraud... where does that leave us? Are we supposed to curl up in the fetal position and trust nothing? Why not go with what has a pretty good track record... mainstream science. If you look at the history of people like Archibald or whatever his name is, they have always been manipulators... science has usually been correct.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

:roll: That's crap...As much as you'd like it to be the debate on this to be closed, it is a long way from settled.



Krauthamer [sic] has it right.




As always, Krauthammer is spot on.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

:roll: That's crap...As much as you'd like it to be the debate on this to be closed, it is a long way from settled.

Krauthamer [sic] has it right.

LMAO, Krauthamer? This guy has to be one of the top 10 biggest blowhards ever. Is this really where you get your ideas from? He makes Michael Moore look fair and balanced.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

I'm still waiting for that link to the science organization that has classified AGW as a Scientific Theory.

Could you please provide that for me?

I have linked clear support for what I claimed. The overwhelming majority believe man has contributed to global warming. Whatever game your playing, it's not changing that I supported my claim fully.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

As always, Krauthammer is spot on.

........... I can't do this anymore. You guys... :lamo

I'm going to delete my account, I can't talk with your people anymore. You're tards.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

So is he a scientist or a political ideologue? I use scientist, and you use a commentator. Tell me about agenda again.


Did you listen to the name of the scientist that he cited?

Krauthammer is a lawyer and a doctor. Neither field is noted for being peopled by those with limited mental acuity.

That Krauthammer is both and earned both degrees after being paralyzed in a diving accident is impressive.

You have a knack for picking out the smallest, most unrelated deteail of any post to disagree with and then ignore the actual intent of the post.

It was nice to see the lack of emoticons.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

It appears you have reading issues. Our claims have been fully supported.



And yet none of what you post has to do with the science of the topic. You only post that a rigged survey claims that 97% agree when actually only 32% agree.

Beyond that, you don't say what it is exactly that they agree to and when that agreement was reached and who conducted the survey and how.

You really are posting nothing but opinion.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

You guys are a trip I'll give you that. Your logic is so strange, it challenges the very basis of fundamental abstract principles and thinking. I dunno man... what if... what if EVERYTHING is wrong? What if... what if all books are wrong? What if what they teach you in school isn't real? What if the number systems are broken? What if counting from 1 to 100 is a trick... what if a number is missing? What if progressives steal money from you because you don't know about the missing number?

I don't know man... you have to trust something. Isn't centuries of the scientific method the best candidate of something to trust? If we can't trust the best science we have, what are we supposed to trust? Certainly its better than trusting an oil industry CEO, right? No source is 100%, no science is 100%, its all a best guess. This is again, basic science 101 which you should know.

It seems like you're just trying to make everything a wash. You counter that your bad source can't be trusted so you turn it around and say ok well, NOTHING can be trusted then. EVERYTHING is corrupt, everything is broken, everything is a fraud... where does that leave us? Are we supposed to curl up in the fetal position and trust nothing? Why not go with what has a pretty good track record... mainstream science. If you look at the history of people like Archibald or whatever his name is, they have always been manipulators... science has usually been correct.



The scientific method is what disproves the idea of AGW.

If you have scientific proof that AGW is provable, then go ahead and present it. Also the scientific organization that says this is a Scientific Theory. The two go hand in hand.

Can't prove it? it can't be a Scientific Theory. THAT is the result of the scientific method which is absent from the notion you present as science.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

LMAO, Krauthamer? This guy has to be one of the top 10 biggest blowhards ever. Is this really where you get your ideas from? He makes Michael Moore look fair and balanced.



Not even Krauthammer can do that.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

The scientific method is what disproves the idea of AGW.

If you have scientific proof that AGW is provable, then go ahead and present it. Also the scientific organization that says this is a Scientific Theory. The two go hand in hand.

Can't prove it? it can't be a Scientific Theory. THAT is the result of the scientific method which is absent from the notion you present as science.

Are you ever going to get a book on science? Here let me help...

Let me google that for you

You can't prove something is true... bro.
 
Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W

You and Verax seem incapable of presenting proof to support the Science of AGW.

You both are careful to post emoticons.

I suppose you use what you have.

Read Nature. Science. PNAS. The proof is there. Don't fault them because YOU can't/won't comprehend it.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

I have linked clear support for what I claimed. The overwhelming majority believe man has contributed to global warming. Whatever game your playing, it's not changing that I supported my claim fully.



You have supported that particular claim which is particularly vague and meaningless.

Who conducted the survey and how was the survey conducted? When was the survey conducted?

What contribution have they agreed upon? 1%? 5%? 50%? 100%?

How much warming in degrees do they agree has occurred and from what point in time are they starting the measure?

There is nothing at all that is scientific about what you have posted. It is propaganda to support an agenda. There is no science and no proof of the topic included in what you say.

However, for what it's worth, you have supported the particularly meaningless phrase that you said.
 
Last edited:
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

........... I can't do this anymore. You guys... :lamo

I'm going to delete my account, I can't talk with your people anymore. You're tards.



Nice emoticon.

Again, no information or proof of any kind.

Why do you post?
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Nice emoticon.

Again, no information or proof of any kind.

Why do you post?

I've tried to appeal to you with logic, facts, solid information, but it bounces off of you like a superball off concrete. Its like trying to teach Ralph Wiggum rocket science. At some point you can't take it anymore and have a mental breakdown. :lol:
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Are you ever going to get a book on science? Here let me help...

Let me google that for you

You can't prove something is true... bro.




Well, at least we know that you know how to Google.

It might serve you well to try to find something that supports your assertion.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W

Read Nature. Science. PNAS. The proof is there. Don't fault them because YOU can't/won't comprehend it.



I only doubt. It takes very little to create doubt in an open mind.

I takes a wide and deep amount of proof to create belief in an open mind.

If one has faith, ones does not need proof. I don't have faith so I need proof. You apparently don't need proof.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

I've tried to appeal to you with logic, facts, solid information, but it bounces off of you like a superball off concrete. Its like trying to teach Ralph Wiggum rocket science. At some point you can't take it anymore and have a mental breakdown. :lol:



Could you refer me to the post that has the silver bullet of proof that absolutely proves the Science of AGW?

What you seem to think you have posted apparently was not well enough explained.

Perhaps you could favor me?

You don't even need to use the emoticons. Unless you think a 7th grade girl is going to be reading this, too.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

And yet none of what you post has to do with the science of the topic. You only post that a rigged survey claims that 97% agree when actually only 32% agree.

Beyond that, you don't say what it is exactly that they agree to and when that agreement was reached and who conducted the survey and how.

You really are posting nothing but opinion.
But it does. I've linked many things. I topped when it became clear you weren't reading it.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

But it does. I've linked many things. I topped when it became clear you weren't reading it.



Post the silver bullet for me.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

You have supported that particular claim which is particularly vague and meaningless.

Who conducted the survey and how was the survey conducted? When was the survey conducted?

What contribution have they agreed upon? 1%? 5%? 50%? 100%?

How much warming in degrees do they agree has occurred and from what point in time are they starting the measure?

There is nothing at all that is scientific about what you have posted. It is propaganda to support an agenda. There is no science and no proof of the topic included in what you say.

However, for what it's worth, you have supported the particularly meaningless phrase that you said.

I've given more than one link dealing with it. Each can be followed to answer those questions.
 
Back
Top Bottom