• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Oh yeah and the bags?

Who the hell would pay for a 2.00 bag? Oh yeah the insecure trendy folk who need to show everyone else how environmentally friendly they are...

That is the problem here - everyone wants to show off how PC they are...

Who the **** pays 2 dollars for a plastic recycled bag? - oh yeah people who want to walk around with it attempting to show anyone and everyone how great they are because they bought a plastic bag for 2 bucks and how it must help the planet somehow. Yeah they know nothing about climate but they sure in the hell know plenty about being conceited and creating an image.

Anything else you need to go on a completely non-sensical rant about, or are you done?

In your ideal world, everybody would show off how un-PC they are. Here's a secret for you -- I DON'T GIVE A SH*T. People who judge me because I use a reusable bag are just as bad as people who judge me for not using it. It's all judgemental people telling me how to live my life. You want to tell me how to live? WTF kind of Libertarian is that? Yes I choose to do some things "greener" because I think less garbage is a good thing regardless of anything about climate change. I'd rather have cleaner air I can breathe rather than live in Beijing. See, the thing about CO2 is this: I can't breathe it! I don't know and don't care if it's a "greenhouse gas!" Simple fact is, I like to breathe.

So screw your attitude that judges me just as much as others. You're no different, except that you think you're some kind of Libertarian because "Atlas Shrugged" gives you a boner.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Anything else you need to go on a completely non-sensical rant about, or are you done?

In your ideal world, everybody would show off how un-PC they are. Here's a secret for you -- I DON'T GIVE A SH*T. People who judge me because I use a reusable bag are just as bad as people who judge me for not using it. It's all judgemental people telling me how to live my life. You want to tell me how to live? WTF kind of Libertarian is that? Yes I choose to do some things "greener" because I think less garbage is a good thing regardless of anything about climate change. I'd rather have cleaner air I can breathe rather than live in Beijing. See, the thing about CO2 is this: I can't breathe it! I don't know and don't care if it's a "greenhouse gas!" Simple fact is, I like to breathe.

So screw your attitude that judges me just as much as others. You're no different, except that you think you're some kind of Libertarian because "Atlas Shrugged" gives you a boner.

I don't give a **** how you live your life.....

I'm telling you something and you dismiss it as if I give a rats-ass? you can go ahead and do and live however you like.

I'm getting pretty tired of the notion that a libertarian cant have an opinion on an issue - especially when it's no where close to authoritarian..... I'm tired of the simple anti-libertarian logic - as if it is a prerequisite that being a libertarian "requires" one to be mute (the English language sucks BTW - I had to use two ****ing words that mean the same to finish a sentence).. We have a lot to say, and most alleged "libertarians" are not "liberal" at all................ Reserve your opinions about my beliefs before you go addressing; Classical Liberalism, Libertarianism, Anarchism or other fringe ideals and philosophies.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

I don't give a **** how you live your life.....

If you don't give a crap how I live my life, don't judge how I do it. Which you did.

You came out and said everybody who uses a re-usable bag is showing off how green they are to score PC points. You wouldn't know a thing about me and my life, yet you decide that you should tell me what to do. I don't think so. Just because you're scoring points with your Republican buddies by being so un-PC, telling someone how they should live makes you no better than the PC crowd you decry.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

You're wandering into incoherence again.



You're failing to support your position again.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Anything else you need to go on a completely non-sensical rant about, or are you done?

In your ideal world, everybody would show off how un-PC they are. Here's a secret for you -- I DON'T GIVE A SH*T. People who judge me because I use a reusable bag are just as bad as people who judge me for not using it. It's all judgemental people telling me how to live my life. You want to tell me how to live? WTF kind of Libertarian is that? Yes I choose to do some things "greener" because I think less garbage is a good thing regardless of anything about climate change. I'd rather have cleaner air I can breathe rather than live in Beijing. See, the thing about CO2 is this: I can't breathe it! I don't know and don't care if it's a "greenhouse gas!" Simple fact is, I like to breathe.

So screw your attitude that judges me just as much as others. You're no different, except that you think you're some kind of Libertarian because "Atlas Shrugged" gives you a boner.

Stripping some of the reaction to another poster out of it, I generally agree. There is nothing wrong with conservation and addressing pollution. Unfortunately, those are lost to the insane cult of AGW which is sucking all the air out of the room.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Stripping some of the reaction to another poster out of it, I generally agree. There is nothing wrong with conservation and addressing pollution. Unfortunately, those are lost to the insane cult of AGW which is sucking all the air out of the room.

Hey kids, a strawman, brought to you by a science denier.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Hey kids, a strawman, brought to you by a science denier.


Hey kids look, as usual a flagrant violation of rules posted once again by a usual suspect.....Good god boy, for once in your life post something worth reading will you?
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Stripping some of the reaction to another poster out of it, I generally agree. There is nothing wrong with conservation and addressing pollution. Unfortunately, those are lost to the insane cult of AGW which is sucking all the air out of the room.

They're also lost on the overly reactionary, who see something the classify as "PC" and make sure they do the exact opposite.

Denis Leary's song "Asshole" is a fun song, but it's not really a blueprint for how to live your life.

 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

The hoax of anthropogenic climate change. LOL Then the low information voters toss out the term "science denier" when in same breath they reverse peristalsis "but there is a *consensus*". Does someone have some popcorn, the movie has started.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Facts say that the climate change is natural. Facts also say that climate change is happening at an unnatural pace that corresponds with the CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 has been increasing rapidly as a result of human activity. Burning of fuels, stripping of the rainforests, etc.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Who the **** pays 2 dollars for a plastic recycled bag? - oh yeah people who want to walk around with it attempting to show anyone and everyone how great they are because they bought a plastic bag for 2 bucks and how it must help the planet somehow. Yeah they know nothing about climate but they sure in the hell know plenty about being conceited and creating an image.

The movement to ban plastic bags does not aim to tackle climate change. Instead, it is largely focused on water. The following is an information sheet put out by one of the organizations advocating that position.

http://www.healthebay.org/sites/def...y - Plastic Bags Fact Sheet_December 2012.pdf

I live in a community that is considering such a move. A neighboring community has already banned them with strong support from merchants. The issue at hand is that large numbers of such bags have been turning up in recent years in the salt marshes that line the Long Island Sound, two rivers that pass through the community along with smaller tributaries, and in trees. Like many local communities, the town has been experiencing fiscal challenges. It is also subject to New York State's 2% property tax cap (likely to be waived this year by a vote of the Council on account of pension/health costs, especially as a poll of local residents strongly supported such a move). The efforts to remove the bags from the trees, streams, and marshes impose costs on the town.

One alternative would entail spreading those cleanup costs to the merchants issuing plastic bags (allocated based on approximating their share of the bags). Grocery stores already have thin profit margins and a relatively elastic demand curve would make it difficult to pass a large share of those costs to consumers. Not surprisingly, that alternative was not considered.

Another alternative would entail levying a fine to the merchant whose bag was found. That would be unfair, as it isn't the merchant's fault that someone improperly disposed of their bag. In practical terms, it would lead to bags being unmarked. That alternative would not be viable and it wasn't considered.

Another option is doing nothing. Under that option, the town would finance the increasing clean up costs and, given the long-term fiscal issues involved (ranging from pension/health costs to future reductions in state/county funding that appear likely on account of their fiscal challenges), by reducing other services and/or raising taxes. The survey on waiving the tax cap revealed very little support for reducing police, fire, first responder, etc., services.

That leaves idea of banning plastic bags. The costs to merchants associated with issuing substitute bags were a ban implemented would be very small. That estimate is based on the experience of communities in the Tri-State area that have banned plastic bags. Under the ban being considered, one would not be required to have resusable bags. Merchants would merely use paper or other plastic substitutes, paper being the overwhelming choice from what I've heard. There would be exceptions e.g., for certain packaged foods.

In the end, the issue really has to do with pollution in this local case, not a desire to be "green" for the sake of being "green." There is no desire for the town to dictate to its residents how to lead their lives, but a desire to solve what has evolved into a real problem. If others have better ideas for addressing the pollution problem described above in a fashion that shields the town from growing clean up costs, there is a comment period available before the legislation is taken up. If the experience is similar to that of the neighboring community that adopted the ban about a year ago (and by a unanimous vote among a Republican-majority Council), no such alternatives will be introduced. Instead, the ban will be the position that enjoys the largest share of public support.
 
Last edited:
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

What caused the end of the last Ice Age?

This guy!

Cute-Scrat-ice-age-20840462-450-300.jpg
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

Facts say that the climate change is natural. Facts also say that climate change is happening at an unnatural pace that corresponds with the CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 has been increasing rapidly as a result of human activity. Burning of fuels, stripping of the rainforests, etc.



The increase of CO2 as a cause of Global Warming and any other tree hugger cause do not automatically link up despite the inability of some to recognize the discreet and defined separations in the causes and the effects and the absolute disconnect in the actions needed to correct a particular local problem or a global cyclical change.

Climate change does not correspond to CO2 change. The temperature of the climate started its upward move out of the depths of the Little Ice Age about 300 years before CO2 departed from its 280 ppm level in about 1880. The increase in CO2 has been very consistent while the increase in the temperature has been very inconsistent.

Hearing that something is occurring in a particular way and then basing all actions on that rumor with no understanding of the actual occurrence is the way we justified most of the ills of our history.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

The movement to ban plastic bags does not aim to tackle climate change. Instead, it is largely focused on water. The following is an information sheet put out by one of the organizations advocating that position.

http://www.healthebay.org/sites/def...y - Plastic Bags Fact Sheet_December 2012.pdf

I live in a community that is considering such a move. A neighboring community has already banned them with strong support from merchants. The issue at hand is that large numbers of such bags have been turning up in recent years in the salt marshes that line the Long Island Sound, two rivers that pass through the community along with smaller tributaries, and in trees. Like many local communities, the town has been experiencing fiscal challenges. It is also subject to New York State's 2% property tax cap (likely to be waived this year by a vote of the Council on account of pension/health costs, especially as a poll of local residents strongly supported such a move). The efforts to remove the bags from the trees, streams, and marshes impose costs on the town.

One alternative would entail spreading those cleanup costs to the merchants issuing plastic bags (allocated based on approximating their share of the bags). Grocery stores already have thin profit margins and a relatively elastic demand curve would make it difficult to pass a large share of those costs to consumers. Not surprisingly, that alternative was not considered.

Another alternative would entail levying a fine to the merchant whose bag was found. That would be unfair, as it isn't the merchant's fault that someone improperly disposed of their bag. In practical terms, it would lead to bags being unmarked. That alternative would not be viable and it wasn't considered.

Another option is doing nothing. Under that option, the town would finance the increasing clean up costs and, given the long-term fiscal issues involved (ranging from pension/health costs to future reductions in state/county funding that appear likely on account of their fiscal challenges), by reducing other services and/or raising taxes. The survey on waiving the tax cap revealed very little support for reducing police, fire, first responder, etc., services.

That leaves idea of banning plastic bags. The costs to merchants associated with issuing substitute bags were a ban implemented would be very small. That estimate is based on the experience of communities in the Tri-State area that have banned plastic bags. Under the ban being considered, one would not be required to have resusable bags. Merchants would merely use paper or other plastic substitutes, paper being the overwhelming choice from what I've heard. There would be exceptions e.g., for certain packaged foods.

In the end, the issue really has to do with pollution in this local case, not a desire to be "green" for the sake of being "green." There is no desire for the town to dictate to its residents how to lead their lives, but a desire to solve what has evolved into a real problem. If others have better ideas for addressing the pollution problem described above in a fashion that shields the town from growing clean up costs, there is a comment period available before the legislation is taken up. If the experience is similar to that of the neighboring community that adopted the ban about a year ago (and by a unanimous vote among a Republican-majority Council), no such alternatives will be introduced. Instead, the ban will be the position that enjoys the largest share of public support.



I don't know everything about pollution, but it seems the bast way to control anything bad is to not produce it in the first place if you have the choice.

Source reduction eliminates the need to control so much of it.

When I was growing up, the rule was waste not want not. That rule has fallen victim to the whole pre-packaged, do it now, immediate gratification society in which we now live.

I lived on a farm for about 6 months and THAT was the definition of delayed gratification. I became a part of the micro society as we collectively tended the Strawberry plants so we could enjoy strawberry tarts, pies, ice cream, with cream and shortcake. By the time the damn things stopped giving berries, I was sick of strawberries in all of their permutations and convinced that I never wanted to see another in my lifetime.

I got a letter (real paper snail mail letter, handwritten) the following Spring asking if I might stop by for some pie when the berries came in that Summer. My mouth literally started to water at the thought. I couldn't make it. Work schedule, distance and so on.

No packaging, no shipping, no disposable pie tins and no waste of any type except the outhouse kind.

Can you imagine that in today's world in the city though? Wanting to have a strawberry pie in July so we start making the Berries in April?
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

The increase of CO2 as a cause of Global Warming and any other tree hugger cause do not automatically link up despite the inability of some to recognize the discreet and defined separations in the causes and the effects and the absolute disconnect in the actions needed to correct a particular local problem or a global cyclical change.

Climate change does not correspond to CO2 change. The temperature of the climate started its upward move out of the depths of the Little Ice Age about 300 years before CO2 departed from its 280 ppm level in about 1880. The increase in CO2 has been very consistent while the increase in the temperature has been very inconsistent.

Hearing that something is occurring in a particular way and then basing all actions on that rumor with no understanding of the actual occurrence is the way we justified most of the ills of our history.

The increase in CO2 has been consistent, and temperature has been inconsistent. Almost as if there is more than one variable involved, wouldn't you say?

I can show you data that shows solar activity is inconsistent with temperature too. Are you going to sit there and tell me this means the sun doesn't affect temperature? :lamo

You talk as though only one variable can influence any given trend. Temperature did move upwards out of the little ice age. Does this somehow mean variables in play can't change? They take their turns affecting climate? :lamo

A rumor? Really? Decades of research by probably thousands of scientists. And you call it a rumor. How dishonest can you get?

P.S. Don't use a GPS. Relativity is just a rumor. You shouldn't base your actions on it.
 
Last edited:
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

The increase in CO2 has been consistent, and temperature has been inconsistent. Almost as if there is more than one variable involved, wouldn't you say?

I can show you data that shows solar activity is inconsistent with temperature too. Are you going to sit there and tell me this means the sun doesn't affect temperature? :lamo

You talk as though only one variable can influence any given trend. Temperature did move upwards out of the little ice age. Does this somehow mean variables in play can't change? They take their turns affecting climate? :lamo

A rumor? Really? Decades of research by probably thousands of scientists. And you call it a rumor. How dishonest can you get?

P.S. Don't use a GPS. Relativity is just a rumor. You shouldn't base your actions on it.



The idea of AGW is based on the notion that ONE CAUSE is driving the climate.

Of course there are at least 20 discreet causes and the interactions between these causes undoubtedly create thousands or millions of Butterfly effect interrelations.

The AGW proponent declares quite clearly that the climate can be controlled and directed by Mankind. That is patently ridiculous.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

What caused the end of the last Ice Age?

Nothing, we're presently in an intermediate warming period of an ice age.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

There were some intruments attached to a satellite to measure the Sun's energy beaming to earth. From something like 1976 to 1986, the Sensor to measure the Solar Energy cost something like $70,000. There was talk of putting a sensor cosuting some $250,00.00.. Apparently that became operational, but is that being cheap?. But the priority to accurately measure variations in Solar heat energy, has been quite low.

22,000 years ago, there was an Ice Age, and areas that are now shorelines, had ice covering the shores, and extending out into the Ocean, some 50 miles. What was the Sun doing then? Total Irradiance?





"The Obama Administration has decided to leave a critical sunlight sensor off the first of a series of environmental satellites that have been plagued with technical problems, cost overruns, and poor management


"At stake is a data record measuring the total amount of radiation striking Earth from the sun that goes back to 1978. That record, maintained by a series of satellites, is crucial to making accurate planetary energy budgets and measuring global warming as the intensity of sunlight fluctuates. Gaps in the record could be devastating to climate science because researchers require overlapping missions so as to calibrate each sensor to one another.

The previous versions of the solar sensor currently in orbit have an expected life of 30 months, and four satellites that have TSIS-like sensors that measure total solar radiation aboard are well beyond their design life. Virgo, for example, was launched in 1995, and SORCE was put into orbit in 2003"


Solar Sensor Dropped From First Environmental Satellite in Troubled Program - ScienceInsider



solar sensor satelite


Google


"LASP provides:
•The Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) instrument
•The Spectral Irradiance Monitor (SIM) instrument
•TSIS Principal Investigator, Peter Pilewskie
•Mission operations for TSIS"


Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics


//
 
Last edited:
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

The movement to ban plastic bags does not aim to tackle climate change. Instead, it is largely focused on water. The following is an information sheet put out by one of the organizations advocating that position.

http://www.healthebay.org/sites/def...y - Plastic Bags Fact Sheet_December 2012.pdf

I live in a community that is considering such a move. A neighboring community has already banned them with strong support from merchants. The issue at hand is that large numbers of such bags have been turning up in recent years in the salt marshes that line the Long Island Sound, two rivers that pass through the community along with smaller tributaries, and in trees. Like many local communities, the town has been experiencing fiscal challenges. It is also subject to New York State's 2% property tax cap (likely to be waived this year by a vote of the Council on account of pension/health costs, especially as a poll of local residents strongly supported such a move). The efforts to remove the bags from the trees, streams, and marshes impose costs on the town.

One alternative would entail spreading those cleanup costs to the merchants issuing plastic bags (allocated based on approximating their share of the bags). Grocery stores already have thin profit margins and a relatively elastic demand curve would make it difficult to pass a large share of those costs to consumers. Not surprisingly, that alternative was not considered.

Another alternative would entail levying a fine to the merchant whose bag was found. That would be unfair, as it isn't the merchant's fault that someone improperly disposed of their bag. In practical terms, it would lead to bags being unmarked. That alternative would not be viable and it wasn't considered.

Another option is doing nothing. Under that option, the town would finance the increasing clean up costs and, given the long-term fiscal issues involved (ranging from pension/health costs to future reductions in state/county funding that appear likely on account of their fiscal challenges), by reducing other services and/or raising taxes. The survey on waiving the tax cap revealed very little support for reducing police, fire, first responder, etc., services.

That leaves idea of banning plastic bags. The costs to merchants associated with issuing substitute bags were a ban implemented would be very small. That estimate is based on the experience of communities in the Tri-State area that have banned plastic bags. Under the ban being considered, one would not be required to have resusable bags. Merchants would merely use paper or other plastic substitutes, paper being the overwhelming choice from what I've heard. There would be exceptions e.g., for certain packaged foods.

In the end, the issue really has to do with pollution in this local case, not a desire to be "green" for the sake of being "green." There is no desire for the town to dictate to its residents how to lead their lives, but a desire to solve what has evolved into a real problem. If others have better ideas for addressing the pollution problem described above in a fashion that shields the town from growing clean up costs, there is a comment period available before the legislation is taken up. If the experience is similar to that of the neighboring community that adopted the ban about a year ago (and by a unanimous vote among a Republican-majority Council), no such alternatives will be introduced. Instead, the ban will be the position that enjoys the largest share of public support.

Water...... I'm so tired of the water thing.

There is a lake down the street from me, I've swam in it, I got a good gulp of water from it while doing so, I didn't get sick from it - that means the water is safe to drink no matter how many people pee it it. Of course I don't need to drink from the lake but I know if I needed to I could. Hell, how do people think the American Indians got water?

I think some people need to learn the process of evaporation - these people who call themselves "earth friendly" or "environmentalists" hypocritically wouldn't drink water out of anything but a plastic bottle...
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

There were some intruments attached to a satellite to measure the Sun's energy beaming to earth. From something like 1976 to 1986, the Sensor to measure the Solar Energy cost something like $70,000. There was talk of putting a sensor cosuting some $250,00.00.. Apparently that became operational, but is that being cheap?. But the priority to accurately measure variations in Solar heat energy, has been quite low.

22,000 years ago, there was an Ice Age, and areas that are now shorelines, had ice covering the shores, and extending out into the Ocean, some 50 miles. What was the Sun doing then? Total Irradiance?





"The Obama Administration has decided to leave a critical sunlight sensor off the first of a series of environmental satellites that have been plagued with technical problems, cost overruns, and poor management


"At stake is a data record measuring the total amount of radiation striking Earth from the sun that goes back to 1978. That record, maintained by a series of satellites, is crucial to making accurate planetary energy budgets and measuring global warming as the intensity of sunlight fluctuates. Gaps in the record could be devastating to climate science because researchers require overlapping missions so as to calibrate each sensor to one another.

The previous versions of the solar sensor currently in orbit have an expected life of 30 months, and four satellites that have TSIS-like sensors that measure total solar radiation aboard are well beyond their design life. Virgo, for example, was launched in 1995, and SORCE was put into orbit in 2003"


Solar Sensor Dropped From First Environmental Satellite in Troubled Program - ScienceInsider



solar sensor satelite


Google


"LASP provides:
•The Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) instrument
•The Spectral Irradiance Monitor (SIM) instrument
•TSIS Principal Investigator, Peter Pilewskie
•Mission operations for TSIS"


Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics


//

It's weird seeing numbers I can rationally compute these days coming from a taxpayer funded organization.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

The idea of AGW is based on the notion that ONE CAUSE is driving the climate.

I'm going to stop you right there.

No it isn't. Literally nobody has ever argued that. Until you can grasp this concept, there's no point to this discussion because you aren't being honest. You're just sticking your head in the sand and completely ignoring the decades of work and billions of dollars spent on analyzing all sorts of other influences on climate.

Why? Why are you doing that?
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

It's amazing how there is 23 pages of bickering over the notion that the sun heats the earth.

Using the progressive logic all our pollution should reflect the sun - which was what was initially proposed back in the 70's - it was called "global cooling." Of course now it's AGW, I mean "climate change".....

It's quite obvious man cannot live without the prospect of impending doom... The conspiracy would be great if it didn't affect my life.

Now back to your scheduled programming....
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

It's amazing how there is 23 pages of bickering over the notion that the sun heats the earth.

Using the progressive logic all our pollution should reflect the sun - which was what was initially proposed back in the 70's - it was called "global cooling." Of course now it's AGW, I mean "climate change".....

It's quite obvious man cannot live without the prospect of impending doom... The conspiracy would be great if it didn't affect my life.

Now back to your scheduled programming....

What is really means is that the government is going to go after the money in your pocket in order to 'save the planet'. That's why it was mentioned it the SOTU speech.

It's a scam.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

What is really means is that the government is going to go after the money in your pocket in order to 'save the planet'. That's why it was mentioned it the SOTU speech.

It's a scam.

I know, I just wanted to add my .02 cents on the topic.

Remember; progressives are the gift that keeps on giving....
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm

I know, I just wanted to add my .02 cents on the topic.

Remember; progressives are the gift that keeps on giving....

As far as irony is concerned, yes. Otherwise they mostly keep on taking.
 
Back
Top Bottom