You are the Sarah Palin of climate, with the addition of an illusion of intellectual ability, which just makes you more mockable.
I would actually argue the points, but I've done this here, and I find if I can prove A, the topic just gets shifted to B, and then C, and D, until eventually you guys keep insisting on proving A again. And your fallback is that the data is 'fudged',,, i.e. made up. If you cant trust the data, you cant trust the science. And if you cant trust the science, you cant pretend to use OTHER science to disprove the science with supposedly bad data. Its a totally ****ed up argument. And you either dont know that, or DO know it and dont care. Either way, its Palinesque.