• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama [W:25]

Pagan

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
179
Reaction score
102
Location
Seattle
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

obamadrone.jpg
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

Thank you for falling for pointless political distraction number 10284647292827364748594. We appreciate your efforts to make news out of absolutely nothing and are sure there are no legitimate issues going on at this very moment you could have been concerned about.

No really, can you explain why you even care if obama went skeet shooting or not? This is like pictures of GWB doing yard work. Maybe if he were sticking the gun up his ass i might see a story, but it is not like he shot someone in the face.
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

I say we need to get a nice good thread going :2razz::cool:

obamaskeet.jpg
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

Thank you for falling for pointless political distraction number 10284647292827364748594. We appreciate your efforts to make news out of absolutely nothing and are sure there are no legitimate issues going on at this very moment you could have been concerned about.

No really, can you explain why you even care if obama went skeet shooting or not? This is like pictures of GWB doing yard work. Maybe if he were sticking the gun up his ass i might see a story, but it is not like he shot someone in the face.


Aaaah it's about the warning from the Whitehouse "not" to photoshop it, you might wanna at least read the subject of the thread at the bare minimum ya know ;)
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

Aaaah it's about the warning from the Whitehouse "not" to photoshop it, you might wanna at least read the subject of the thread at the bare minimum ya know ;)

Haha, funny since it's a government photo, it is public domain. Sorry Mr Prez.
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

Aaaah it's about the warning from the Whitehouse "not" to photoshop it, you might wanna at least read the subject of the thread at the bare minimum ya know ;)

You expect intelligence from tererun? I never expect more than "Guns are bad, derp..."
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

You expect intelligence from tererun? I never expect more than "Guns are bad, derp..."

You have to cut me a bit of slack, I'm new to the forums ;)

But not even reading the title...... Wow ....... :roll:
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

If they added that warning, I think they wanted it to be photoshopped. :lol:
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

:lamo :lamo

Obama-skeet-shooting.jpg
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

Thank you for falling for pointless political distraction number 10284647292827364748594. We appreciate your efforts to make news out of absolutely nothing and are sure there are no legitimate issues going on at this very moment you could have been concerned about.

No really, can you explain why you even care if obama went skeet shooting or not? This is like pictures of GWB doing yard work. Maybe if he were sticking the gun up his ass i might see a story, but it is not like he shot someone in the face.



"Oh" you mean like MSDNC and the rest of MS media. :shock:


In a major public relations blunder, President Obama recently made a passing comment inferring that he was a frequent skeet shooter. Given his long history of involvement with promoting gun control legislation, the President's comments met with considerable skepticism an no small measure of ridicule......snip~
rolleyes.png
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

What a ridiculous story. This "reporter" should be ashamed of himself as it's obvious that all he did was read a Brietbart story and attempted to put ZERO actual effort into research of his own. Had he did that, he'd have discovered this...

The Flikr page hosting the picture and the "warning" HERE

The warning being:

This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.

Note what happens when you hit older?

You get this picture

http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/8430089939/

What's under it?

This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.

or how about this photo?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/8391031418/in/photostream/

This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.

Or this one?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/3483994905/

This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.

That one? That one is from September 3rd, 2009.

Yes, what an amazing news story this is. Obama's PR people posted a photo with the standard tag they've used on their photos for the past 4 years. OMG!
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

What a ridiculous story. This "reporter" should be ashamed of himself as it's obvious that all he did was read a Brietbart story and attempted to put ZERO actual effort into research of his own. Had he did that, he'd have discovered this...

The Flikr page hosting the picture and the "warning" HERE

The warning being:



Note what happens when you hit older?

You get this picture

P013013PS-0199 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

What's under it?



or how about this photo?

P011713LJ-0016 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!



Or this one?

P012009PS-0962 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!



That one? That one is from September 3rd, 2009.

Yes, what an amazing news story this is. Obama's PR people posted a photo with the standard tag they've used on their photos for the past 4 years. OMG!

Party pooper. ;)
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

So can we say we are officially making this the Obama Skeet Shooting Joke thread? If so, I've got a lot I found lol.
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

imagesCA53QJIB.jpg
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

What a ridiculous story. This "reporter" should be ashamed of himself as it's obvious that all he did was read a Brietbart story and attempted to put ZERO actual effort into research of his own. Had he did that, he'd have discovered this...

The Flikr page hosting the picture and the "warning" HERE

The warning being:



Note what happens when you hit older?

You get this picture

P013013PS-0199 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

What's under it?



or how about this photo?

P011713LJ-0016 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!



Or this one?

P012009PS-0962 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!



That one? That one is from September 3rd, 2009.

Yes, what an amazing news story this is. Obama's PR people posted a photo with the standard tag they've used on their photos for the past 4 years. OMG!



th


So what.....get over it!
burp.gif
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

th


So what.....get over it!
burp.gif

So what? So "reporters" making a story out of the notion of the Obama admin specifically trying to tell people not to alter the gun picture are idiots who aren't doing even the most minute amount of research possible showing their complete and utter lack of professionalism, abject bias, and agenda driven "reporting".

Get over what? That stupid partisan hack reporters, and similar partisan hacks that happily skip along to those peoples drum beats, do stupid stuff? Eh, I've long since accepted that kind of ridiculous political "discourse" is the norm for the hacks on all sides of the aisles, nothing to really "Get over".
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

So what? So "reporters" making a story out of the notion of the Obama admin specifically trying to tell people not to alter the gun picture are idiots who aren't doing even the most minute amount of research possible showing their complete and utter lack of professionalism, abject bias, and agenda driven "reporting".

Get over what? That stupid partisan hack reporters, and similar partisan hacks that happily skip along to those peoples drum beats, do stupid stuff? Eh, I've long since accepted that kind of ridiculous political "discourse" is the norm for the hacks on all sides of the aisles, nothing to really "Get over".

Oh come on, stop peeing out our Wheaties and let's have some fun with it ;)

Here's one of my favorites from the past -

bush-dictator.jpg
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

So what? So "reporters" making a story out of the notion of the Obama admin specifically trying to tell people not to alter the gun picture are idiots who aren't doing even the most minute amount of research possible showing their complete and utter lack of professionalism, abject bias, and agenda driven "reporting".

Get over what? That stupid partisan hack reporters, and similar partisan hacks that happily skip along to those peoples drum beats, do stupid stuff? Eh, I've long since accepted that kind of ridiculous political "discourse" is the norm for the hacks on all sides of the aisles, nothing to really "Get over".



Meh.....
shrug.gif
 
Re: White House Warns Skeptical Public Against Altering Photo of Obama "Skeet Shoot"

If the desire is to have "some fun with it" then it should be in "The Lighter Side". If it's meant to be news, and discussing news, then it should stay here and wheaties should be pissed in. With that said...

Moderator's Warning:
Either people start discussing the story or the thread continues to be one that's has little content other than "Obama photoshopped gun" memes. If it continues to be the latter, it will be moved to the appropriate location. Don't care which direction it goes, but so far people have been treating this like a Lighter Side thread and if it continues it will be moved accordingly
 
Back
Top Bottom