• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama goes 'skeet shooting all the time'? Hardly ever, sources say[W: 59]

The problem is that I LIVE in Chicago and I know for a fact that what you are telling me is a load of horse****. It's not about supporting "tyrannical ideas", it's about knowing the difference between what is true and what is made up bull****.

When people make up a load of bull**** to try and argue against unjust laws that affect me directly and I also oppose, they do me a disservice. Made up bull**** undermines the intelligent arguments against our gun laws because it makes all of us who do oppose those laws look like idiots who can't present a factual, coherent argument against the laws.

As I keep saying, there are plenty of legitimate arguments against Chicago's gun laws. Making up total nonsense and pretending it's true doesn't do a goddamned thing to promote those legitimate arguments. I support those legitimate arguments, but I won't support idiocy simply because it is intended to achieve the same goals as those legitimate points.

I'm from Chicago too you know? I currently don't live in the city but I still live in the area.

It's quite clear you live in absolute denial and have no desire to live in reality.

What are you going to say next? Chicago cops wont beat the snot out of individuals?

You're clearly a college student or live in the nice part of Evanston, Skokie et al or somewhere along the lake shore where folks have a lot of money and lawyers that will get their guns back... Sorry for us underprivileged guys they take our guns because they know we cant afford to get them back.... They won't take your gun tho...
 
I'm from Chicago too you know? I currently don't live in the city but I still live in the area.

So then you know that what you are saying is bull****, which makes it worse.

It's quite clear you live in absolute denial and have no desire to live in reality.

:prof I'm not the one who is dependent on making **** up in order to present his case.

What are you going to say next? Chicago cops wont beat the snot out of individuals?

Some will, some won't.

You're clearly a college student or live in the nice part of Evanston, Skokie et al or somewhere along the lake shore where folks have a lot of money and lawyers that will get their guns back... Sorry for us

I come from a blue collar immigrant family (my dad was an "illegal" when he came here, heavens to bitsy!) and worked construction for about 11 years until I went back to school for my masters degree. I began working construction full-time right after high school and got my college degree while I worked because I had to pay for that **** myself.

But please, tell me more of your "theories". They're really quite hilarious.


underprivileged guys they take our guns because they know we cant afford to get them back....

Please spare the "oh poor me bull****" for someone dumb enough to fall for it. I'm betting I ate a hell of a lot more ketchup sandwiches growing up than you did.

They won't take your gun tho...

Nor will they take yours.
 
So then you know that what you are saying is bull****, which makes it worse.



:prof I'm not the one who is dependent on making **** up in order to present his case.



Some will, some won't.



I come from a blue collar immigrant family (my dad was an "illegal" when he came here, heavens to bitsy!) and worked construction for about 11 years until I went back to school for my masters degree. I began working construction full-time right after high school and got my college degree while I worked because I had to pay for that **** myself.

But please, tell me more of your "theories". They're really quite hilarious.




Please spare the "oh poor me bull****" for someone dumb enough to fall for it. I'm betting I ate a hell of a lot more ketchup sandwiches growing up than you did.



Nor will they take yours.

You do realize the past and present are different?

Also, why the hell would I just makeup what I'm telling you? I have better things to do than BS a total stranger for no Goddamn reason. Not to mention I'm not even giving you hearsay, including myself I've seen it happen twice. Also, I've never seen a legal gun owner get their gun handed to them right back after the cops had possession of the firearm.

Yeah outside of Crook County (or the city limits) they will give you your gun back - just not in the city.

Do you understand the difference between Arlington Heights and the city of Chicago?
 
You do realize the past and present are different?

You'er talking about what will happen right now. I now that it won't happen right now.

Also, why the hell would I just makeup what I'm telling you?

****ed if I know, I just know that they aren't running around taking people's shotguns. I can drive through teh city with my shotgun, provided I follow the rules for doing so, without any fear of that gun being taken away.

I have better things to do than BS a total stranger for no Goddamn reason. Not to mention I'm not even giving you hearsay, including myself I've seen it happen twice. Also, I've never seen a legal gun owner get their gun handed to them right back after the cops had possession of the firearm.

I'd bet dollars to doughnuts both cases you have seen were illegally possessed handguns which were being carried concealed, not shotguns.

The laws about CC and handgun laws are bull**** that do exactly **** all to lower the crime rates. That's enough, in and of itself, to oppose those laws. We don't need to try and pretend that shotguns and rifles are also banned. The registration bull**** sucks, but it's a hell of a lot better than a full on ban. I'd like to see the bans and such gone first, then we can go after the lesser infringements such as registration (or more correctly, the registration fees).

Do you understand the difference between Arlington Heights and the city of Chicago?

Yeah, Arlington Heights is way the **** out in the country, right?
 
Re: Obama goes 'skeet shooting all the time'? Hardly ever, sources say

He probably does it because anything he says is re-imagined in the worst possible light by the haters anyway. How would he benefit from such a "lie"? Who but the demented gives a ****?

Well, I don't think the positions "scumbag liar" and "partisan assholes" are mutually exclusive here. After all, we are talking politics
 
You'er talking about what will happen right now. I now that it won't happen right now.



****ed if I know, I just know that they aren't running around taking people's shotguns. I can drive through teh city with my shotgun, provided I follow the rules for doing so, without any fear of that gun being taken away.



I'd bet dollars to doughnuts both cases you have seen were illegally possessed handguns which were being carried concealed, not shotguns.

The laws about CC and handgun laws are bull**** that do exactly **** all to lower the crime rates. That's enough, in and of itself, to oppose those laws. We don't need to try and pretend that shotguns and rifles are also banned. The registration bull**** sucks, but it's a hell of a lot better than a full on ban. I'd like to see the bans and such gone first, then we can go after the lesser infringements such as registration (or more correctly, the registration fees).



Yeah, Arlington Heights is way the **** out in the country, right?

I said guns in general - which the police will take, and a shotgun is a gun.

Yeah, Arlington Heights isn't Chicago - if it was the town wouldn't be named Arlington Heights - it would be named Chicago hence I'm talking about Chicago not Arlington Heights. Same county different town.
 
Did any one else notice one itsy-bitsy incongruity with the FoxNews headline and the linked article?

Headline: Obama goes 'skeet shooting all the time'? Hardly ever, sources say

from the article "according to a source who says"


ONE anonymous source is quoted. ONE is singular, not plural. ONE is not "sources", it is "a source"
 
Yes, you are badly mistaken. :coffeepap

$60 Trillion of liabilities from being Capitalists? $16 Trillion of debt?

No, no, no... that mountain, and the $16 Trillion of debt are products of Socialist (or what you would like us to believe is the New Libertarians) PONZI SCHEMES.

America's Socialist chickens... are coming home... to roost!

Socialists are a little like Nazi's after their fall from grace... all of a sudden... after "it" has hit the fan and feckt the country severely... there are none to be found!

(Boo Radley & Co.) Socialist? Us? Beggars for more and more intrusive government and redistribution schemes? Hell no... not us... we are Investment Capitalists!
 
Last edited:
Did any one else notice one itsy-bitsy incongruity with the FoxNews headline and the linked article?

Headline: Obama goes 'skeet shooting all the time'? Hardly ever, sources say

from the article "according to a source who says"

ONE anonymous source is quoted. ONE is singular, not plural. ONE is not "sources", it is "a source"

They cite one, and obviously someone who wanted "deep cover" so he wouldn't get his ass chewed out by Obama's Gestapo.
One source in "deep cover" was enough. They probably had many to confirm what they printed... you see... that is what professional journalists do.

Have you noticed the massive line of witnesses jumping forward to defend Obama's skeet shooting prowess?

This is posed... notice the form? Obama's photo makes him look like quite the "expert". Just as expert as he is with economic issues. In reality... this babe should be wearing the pants and Obama the skirt... because he shoots like a dame (fool).

31935v.jpg
 
$60 Trillion of liabilities from being Capitalists? $16 Trillion of debt?

No, no, no... that mountain, and the $16 Trillion of debt are products of Socialist (or what you would like us to believe is the New Libertarians) PONZI SCHEMES.

America's Socialist chickens... are coming home... to roost!

Socialists are a little like Nazi's after their fall from grace... all of a sudden... after "it" has hit the fan and feckt the country severely... there are none to be found!

(Boo Radley & Co.) Socialist? Us? Beggars for more and more intrusive government and redistribution schemes? Hell no... not us... we are Investment Capitalists!

I have no idea what silliness you're going on about. :coffeepap
 
I have no idea what silliness you're going on about. :coffeepap

Of course not... you are a part of the "Who cares?" Socialist of Amerika Partei (SAPs) cabal.

$16 Trillion in debt and $60 trillion in unfunded liabilities is only "silliness" to socialists and the ignorant. Actually... you could say "ignorant" as socialists are ignorant.

While you drink your spiked coffee... here is something that should sober you up... debt a deficits brought to you by Socialist engineering...

The $61.6 trillion in unfunded obligations amounts to $528,000 per household. That's more than five times what Americans have borrowed for everything else — mortgages, car loans and other debt. It reflects the challenge as the number of retirees soars over the next 20 years and seniors try to collect on those spending promises.

"The (federal) debt only tells us what the government owes to the public.

U.S. funding for future promises lags by trillions - USATODAY.com
 
People just want to bitch. Am surprized no one is bitchin about him spending so much time at Camp David skeet shooting.

Bitch, bitch, bitch.......lol

There's plenty to bitch about this lying weasel.
 
Of course not... you are a part of the "Who cares?" Socialist of Amerika Partei (SAPs) cabal.

$16 Trillion in debt and $60 trillion in unfunded liabilities is only "silliness" to socialists and the ignorant. Actually... you could say "ignorant" as socialists are ignorant.

While you drink your spiked coffee... here is something that should sober you up... debt a deficits brought to you by Socialist engineering...

Two problems with your claims


Number One - and it's the biggie - most rational folks are saying that the deficits were brought about by two unfunded wars and a cutback in regulations covering the financial industry

Number two - the USAToday article is two years old and its numbers aren't quite so valid when we have dropping deficit numbers - CBO: Budget Deficit Estimate Drops Below $1 Trillion
 
Is there some reason that "some" posters here simply cannot stay on thread?
 
Is there some reason that "some" posters here simply cannot stay on thread?

It's common here. As that Bruce Hornsby tune goes... "that's just the way it is... some thing will never change..."

Something for the topic:
Obama is a skeet shooter all the time, as Bill Clinton is faithful all the time. Both are equally good liars though and are vying for the Pathological Liar of the Socialists of Amerika Cup. Bill, though a pathological liar was politically pragmatic. Obama is a one man wrecking ball with a huge score to settle. Both are tremendous shooters... of the bull kind.
 
Last edited:
Of course not... you are a part of the "Who cares?" Socialist of Amerika Partei (SAPs) cabal.

$16 Trillion in debt and $60 trillion in unfunded liabilities is only "silliness" to socialists and the ignorant. Actually... you could say "ignorant" as socialists are ignorant.

While you drink your spiked coffee... here is something that should sober you up... debt a deficits brought to you by Socialist engineering...

You sound a lot like a koolaid drinker to me. You may want to look in a mirror first. Just a suggest.
 
I said guns in general - which the police will take, and a shotgun is a gun.

They won't take a shotgun unless you are doing something stupid or illegal with it.

Yeah, Arlington Heights isn't Chicago - if it was the town wouldn't be named Arlington Heights - it would be named Chicago hence I'm talking about Chicago not Arlington Heights. Same county different town.

Obviously it isn't Chicago, it's way the **** out in the country.
 
Obama Skeets the Truth

by Rick Jensen @ Rightwingnews

“I do skeet shooting.”

Of course you do, Mr. President.

“I do skeet shooting all the time.”

Which is why skeet shooters (not “doers” of skeet or “skeeters” as you call them) took a quick look at your photo and noted your aim is straight ahead, not upward where the clay target would be. They also noticed you’re pictured using a gun designed for trap shooting, wearing dark sunglasses on a cloudy day, holding the gun incorrectly, your shoulder shows no reaction to what should be the gun’s recoil, and a few other oddities.

Read more about these “oddities” @ Obama Skeets the Truth | Right Wing News
 
Obama's a liar.

Why is anyone surprised by that?

Only his brain dead supporters would even argue the point.
 
They won't take a shotgun unless you are doing something stupid or illegal with it.



Obviously it isn't Chicago, it's way the **** out in the country.

What?

You obviously aren't from Chicago if you have no idea where Arlington Heights is. Arlington Heights is in Crook County - the same county the city of Chicago resides. You may as well call Waukegan, Gurnee or North Chicago the "boonies" next..
 
You obviously aren't from Chicago if you have no idea where Arlington Heights is. Arlington Heights is in Crook County - the same county the city of Chicago resides. You may as well call Waukegan, Gurnee or North Chicago the "boonies" next..

:lol: Ah so you're actually a suburbanite. That explains it.

So is Arlington Heights the suburb you're actually from?
 
Back
Top Bottom