from your previous posts I doubt if you even understand what those words mean
Remember all the liberals in arms when ObamaĎs legal team argued before the courts that the health care insurance mandate is constitutional because it is a tax, while promising to people, no new taxes would be created!
Seems like a very similar situation. The primary difference is in Obamaís case, he is an elected official exhibiting the hypocrisy.
I don't think they are ethically going against their principles, just using the system to reduce a charge on a very bad mistake this doctor made.
It is ironic... but not it a incriminating way though.
Same kind of thing with not believing in government assistance, but taking as much as you can get that is available to you. You don't right the rules to the "game" you just play it till the game destroys itself so you can say, "see I was right all along."
ďAnd I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.Ē
~ James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822