• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Private sales at gun show on hold after three hurt in accidental shooting

Oh yeah, my mother is a CFO of a business which produces products you consume everyday so I have had more business training than you.

I understand the ins and outs and the accounting structure. I can tell you right now you don't know a damn thing about economy or business. So go grab that tissue that my mom is the CFO of and blow your nose, better yet put it in a sandwich bag that my mother is the CFO, then rinse your mirror with that Windex..

I was trained pretty well.
Given this post I think sangha is right about you. $5000 of body upgrades and a Fart Can on to a stock Honda Civic.
 
If you don't believe in gun laws then why the hell are you attempting to give me the business?
You should read my posts closer. Your prejudice is not my problem.
 
Let's take a look at the last major PAC disaster in DC - SOPA. Tell me a bunch of entertainment companies - all in "competition" - didn't band together to make that happen. Of course, the Internet industry that would be injured by SOPA, vehemently opposed it and banded together to shoot it down. That's just the most recent example. There are many, many other examples where competitors in an industry that are "in competition" band together to support or oppose laws.

You could have just bitched about lobbyists.

I don't understand why you're picking certain industries tho.

I think DVD's should be 5 bucks a pop (maybe 8) because it will cut down on pirating - so I agree with you on that.

Hollywood is a novelty when it comes to economy. Commodities are where its at.
 
Do you talk to yourself?

You haven't made one respectable post yet.

You're adding no substance to anything here and attempting to play Rodger Ebert. You've done nothing but criticize me NOT my opinion on the issue that I elaborated on.

If it matters - If there is another Ruby Ridge I will be there as well will be 1,000 patriots standing in arms like the Black Panthers.

He has already admitted he comes on gun threads to annoy pro gun posters.
 
I'm familiar with. I know they lost




Again, there will be no need for confiscation. The rantings of the Delicate Flowers over the Faux Penii are just for show. They will comply with the law, or be jailed.
Deputy US Marshall Degan might not say they lost. Nor the office ordered to pay 3 million dollars to Randy Weaver.
 
He has already admitted he comes on gun threads to annoy pro gun posters.

You have already admitted the only problem for you from the ban will be it will cost you more at the target range!
 
You could have just bitched about lobbyists.

I don't understand why you're picking certain industries tho.

I think DVD's should be 5 bucks a pop (maybe 8) because it will cut down on pirating - so I agree with you on that.

Hollywood is a novelty when it comes to economy. Commodities are where its at.
We were already talking about corporations and politics. How much more explicit do you need it?????


I used that as a popular example. You want others? Look at the oil lobby. Do they represent just one oil company? You think the telecom lobby is just one company??? If you believe that you should demand your money back for that $5 economics education you got.
 
Given this post I think sangha is right about you. $5000 of body upgrades and a Fart Can on to a stock Honda Civic.

No way, I would never drive a civic.

Give me a big boi Chevy Caprice police package box with shiny rims that spin.

I may spell proper but I'm not proper.

Still doesn't mean I don't enjoy blasting Free Bird, Zepp or Brotha Lynch out of the trunk...
 
We were already talking about corporations and politics. How much more explicit do you need it?????


Do they represent just one oil company? You think the telecom lobby is just one company??? If you believe that you should demand your money back for that $5 economics education you got.

If you want to eliminate lobbyists, eliminate income taxes and preferential treatment of any kind. As long as these exist, there will be lobbyists...
 
You have already admitted the only problem for you from the ban will be it will cost you more at the target range!

Your stupid comments continue to be spewed. You haven't read your mistress Feinswein's dictates. That asshole wants the government to confiscate guns I own when I die and that asshole wants us to have to pay 200 dollars each for guns we already own. Hopefully lots of dems up for election in 2014 support that.
 
We were already talking about corporations and politics. How much more explicit do you need it?????


I used that as a popular example. You want others? Look at the oil lobby. Do they represent just one oil company? You think the telecom lobby is just one company??? If you believe that you should demand your money back for that $5 economics education you got.

You act like I'm denying lobbyists exist and I never made such a claim.

As far as the oil, I don't know where your anger comes from. Soon enough the US will be the biggest producer of oil in the world. Progressives just don't want us to be.
 
If you want to eliminate lobbyists, eliminate income taxes and preferential treatment of any kind. As long as these exist, there will be lobbyists...

Holy **** - now I call this progress.
 
If you want to eliminate lobbyists, eliminate income taxes and preferential treatment of any kind. As long as these exist, there will be lobbyists...
Hmmm, not sure where taxes come into that though I agree about preferential treatment.
 
You act like I'm denying lobbyists exist and I never made such a claim.

As far as the oil, I don't know where your anger comes from. Soon enough the US will be the biggest producer of oil in the world. Progressives just don't want us to be.
You said competitors don't band together - or at least made fun of my assertion that they did. Shall I reference your quote for you?

Honestly, I pick some random industry that's in the news and you think I'm singling industries out. You don't seem to bother actually reading my posts and with that I'm going to stop reading yours. I refuse to lead people around by the hand to get my point across.
 
Last edited:
I am glad there is about 80% public support for ending the gun show loophole!

"A recent survey found that over 80% of gun owners and 74% of NRA members support requiring background checks on all gun sales."
Gun Show Loophole-- Brady Campaign Blog

They just closed the loophole...Got this in an email from the ATF today.

http://www.atf.gov/publications/download/p/atf-p-5300-21.pdf

At least they closed the "loophole" as best they could within their power. Why do stupid laws always have to get in the way of an agenda.....
 
Last edited:
page not found is what I got from that link

Wow! That was fast. I wonder what prompted them to pull it. Let me do some quick Google Fu....
 
My Android Nexus cut and paste skills are weak.....corrected the link. Thanks for pointing it out.
 
Your stupid comments continue to be spewed. You haven't read your mistress Feinswein's dictates. That asshole wants the government to confiscate guns I own when I die and that asshole wants us to have to pay 200 dollars each for guns we already own. Hopefully lots of dems up for election in 2014 support that.


How did you plan to continue owning your AR-15 after your death before Feinstein's bill was proposed?
 
How did you plan to continue owning your AR-15 after your death before Feinstein's bill was proposed?

I plan on leaving them to my son and my nieces. You see one of the weapons I was left by my grandfather was his colt 1911 he had in the service. It is promised to my son's first child just as I was my grandfather's first grandchild. I also have the MI carbine that your matriarch claims is an "assault weapon" that my father had in the service that he left to me. I plan on leaving that to my son.

why should my estate and heirs be deprived of property just because people like you are hateful?
 
I plan on leaving them to my son and my nieces. You see one of the weapons I was left by my grandfather was his colt 1911 he had in the service. It is promised to my son's first child just as I was my grandfather's first grandchild. I also have the MI carbine that your matriarch claims is an "assault weapon" that my father had in the service that he left to me. I plan on leaving that to my son.

why should my estate and heirs be deprived of property just because people like you are hateful?


LOL! You must really think I have a lot of power! How's this, unless you are your sons do something stupid with your guns, you can keep them. Does that make you feel better!
 
Back
Top Bottom