• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Private sales at gun show on hold after three hurt in accidental shooting

haymarket said:
I believe you said it was merely a personal conversation.

So there is no verifiable evidence that such things happened. Thank you for confirming that.
Click to expand...

why these extra posts then? I noted where i got the information and I know people were arrested
 
TurtleDude said:
why these extra posts then? I noted where i got the information and I know people were arrested
Click to expand...

Sadly, you cannot offer even the meagerest shred of verifiable evidence that any of this is true.

Lets see what we have here:

1- you make a claim of fact that anti-gun people have disrupted gun shows by intentionally taking loaded weapons into them to cause trouble
2- you fail to offer any verifiable evidence that such an incident even happened once, let alone that this is something of significance which is more than an isolated incident
3- you offer a conversation with an unnamed person and yourself as the only proof that you were informed of this event
4- you have been around long enough to know that such hearsay, especially from the one making the unverifiable claim, is irrelevant and not even worthy of consideration in debate.

This is all about VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE to support ones claims. If you have any, I would welcome reading it.
 
haymarket said:
Sadly, you cannot offer even the meagerest shred of verifiable evidence that any of this is true.

Lets see what we have here:

1- you make a claim of fact that anti-gun people have disrupted gun shows by intentionally taking loaded weapons into them to cause trouble
2- you fail to offer any verifiable evidence that such an incident even happened once, let alone that this is something of significance which is more than an isolated incident
3- you offer a conversation with an unnamed person and yourself as the only proof that you were informed of this event
4- you have been around long enough to know that such hearsay, especially from the one making the unverifiable claim, is irrelevant and not even worthy of consideration in debate.

This is all about VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE to support ones claims. If you have any, I would welcome reading it.
Click to expand...

actually TurtleDude claimed the 'libruls' were caught while attempting to load weapons on display inside various gun shows.
 
Somerville said:
actually TurtleDude claimed the 'libruls' were caught while attempting to load weapons on display inside various gun shows.
Click to expand...

and we still have yet to see any verifiable evidence for the charge.
 
haymarket said:
and we still have yet to see any verifiable evidence for the charge.
Click to expand...

That is true. There was a possibility mentioned in one of the articles about the Ohio show shooting as there were two people arrested but no cause for the arrests was given in the article.
 
Somerville said:
Yep, every American with a firearm knows how to handle it when standing in a crowd



and those three weren't the only ones to enjoy their day at a gun show
Click to expand...

This is what happens when tyrants attempt to ban guns - everyone and their momma wants one despite the fact they have absolutely no idea how to use them safely.

On a different note; maybe Obama should take notice that people are buying guns and ammo in bulk. Does "civil war" mean anything to him? or does the 500% increase in gun sales go over his head?
 
haymarket said:
I believe you said it was merely a personal conversation.

So there is no verifiable evidence that such things happened. Thank you for confirming that.
Click to expand...

It wouldnt make a difference even if the nonsense TD posted was true and verifiable because, and I'll quote

DVSentinel said:
Reason for the accident is simple, someone was a moron. Always, always treat a gun as loaded unless you have cleared and inspected the weapon yourself. Even then, you re-inspect it if you have been away from it before attempting to dry fire. Clearing it is always the first thing I do when handling a gun at a gun show, or even at a gun shop.
Click to expand...

SO even if someone had secretly loaded the weapon, it was the idiot shooters responsibility to treat the gun as if it were loaded.

But some people are always happy to give gun-lovin' morons a free pass.
 
Mr.Nick said:
This is what happens when tyrants attempt to ban guns - everyone and their momma wants one despite the fact they have absolutely no idea how to use them safely.

On a different note; maybe Obama should take notice that people are buying guns and ammo in bulk. Does "civil war" mean anything to him? or does the 500% increase in gun sales go over his head?
Click to expand...

All it means is that certain people need mental exams and possibly institutionalized if they are so brainwashed to believe that Obama or any democrat is a dictator in the making. One could start with the people at Fox News and talk radio who have been pushing this farce for over a decade now.
 
PeteEU said:
All it means is that certain people need mental exams and possibly institutionalized if they are so brainwashed to believe that Obama or any democrat is a dictator in the making. One could start with the people at Fox News and talk radio who have been pushing this farce for over a decade now.
Click to expand...

We know incrementalism when we see it.
 
These nutters are starting to scare me more than the career crackheads!

Another testament as to why psychological evals would be a good thing for gun ownership. LOL!
 
iguanaman said:
With nothing but here-say but you responded. You do know that here-say is inadmissible for a reason.
Click to expand...

if this was a court of law your testimony would have been rejected as dishonest perjury because almost everything you utter on the gun issue is lies or based on absolutely no understanding of what you opine on
 
iguanaman said:
LOL We know lunatics talking when we hear it.
Click to expand...

lunatics being people who want to rape the rights of millions because a few nutcases commit capital murder and often suicide?
 
PeteEU said:
All it means is that certain people need mental exams and possibly institutionalized if they are so brainwashed to believe that Obama or any democrat is a dictator in the making. One could start with the people at Fox News and talk radio who have been pushing this farce for over a decade now.
Click to expand...


most of the people who voted for Obama are probably certifiable

foreigners who slurp obama speak even worse?
 
sangha said:
It wouldnt make a difference even if the nonsense TD posted was true and verifiable because, and I'll quote



SO even if someone had secretly loaded the weapon, it was the idiot shooters responsibility to treat the gun as if it were loaded.

But some people are always happy to give gun-lovin' morons a free pass.
Click to expand...

find where I did that

again you constantly lie about what others post
 
sangha said:
Gee, I wonder why you think that comment described you?
Click to expand...

babbling again I see-you have already admitted your main purpose on gun threads is to harass gun owners and pro gun posters
 
TurtleDude said:
most of the people who voted for Obama are probably certifiable

foreigners who slurp obama speak even worse?
Click to expand...


So in your opinion a majority of those Americans who voted for Obama should be put away - well it would be one way of taking care of your paranoia I suppose
 
Somerville said:
So in your opinion a majority of those Americans who voted for Obama should be put away - well it would be one way of taking care of your paranoia I suppose
Click to expand...

I have no paranoia. The real paranoia comes from the anti gunners who are terrified that their law abiding neighbors cannot be trusted to own the same guns we have owned for 50+ years and that our tax dollars supply to cops
 
TurtleDude said:
I have no paranoia. The real paranoia comes from the anti gunners who are terrified that their law abiding neighbors cannot be trusted to own the same guns we have owned for 50+ years and that our tax dollars supply to cops
Click to expand...

Like most paranoids do, TD is lying about his condition, but it's obvious that his belief that he can read other peoples mind suggests a disturbed inability to post cogently.
 
haymarket said:
Could you please provide a link so we can verify this rather serious claim of fact?
Click to expand...

Actually a friend of mine told me it was a gun advocate pretending to be a anti-gun fanatic secretly loading a gun of a dealer who was a FBI agent pretending to be a gun dealer.
 
Crosscheck said:
Actually a friend of mine told me it was a gun advocate pretending to be a anti-gun fanatic secretly loading a gun of a dealer who was a FBI agent pretending to be a gun dealer.
Click to expand...

clear lies....not helpful but typical of the gun control side
 
TurtleDude said:
clear lies....not helpful but typical of the gun control side
Click to expand...

I'm against you calling them the "gun control side". I am all for gun control. Gun control being the ability to safely handle your guns and hit selected targets, that is gun control. Typical of liberals to give something a false name, but then, Liberals don't even use the term Liberal correctly.
 
DVSentinel said:
I'm against you calling them the "gun control side". I am all for gun control. Gun control being the ability to safely handle your guns and hit selected targets, that is gun control. Typical of liberals to give something a false name, but then, Liberals don't even use the term Liberal correctly.
Click to expand...

fair enough-I will revert to my old term-ARC-anti rights coalition
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom