Sure I can. You still haven't provided any tangible evidence that I would never be able to learn from her because of that.
Stop trying to twist this to be about the children, it's about what the parents and administrators think about our society. You simply see a traditional America, and her as a threat to that. Let's call a spade a spade.
Of course this is about the children and the BEST learning environment for them. Sorry, but this woman's past is a huge obstacle to that, especially for the male students. Perhaps what the parents think about it IS also included in this decision. So what?
I couldn't care less about a "traditional" America, whatever that means. FYI, my own upbringing was FAR from traditional. I am simply looking at this as what is the best learning environment for the children and would this woman's past be a distraction from that goal, and the answer is yes, it would be a distraction.
That sums up most porn. Do you think these middle schoolers would've never been exposed to it otherwise? I know you said you were born in 51, so it's probably hard for you to understand. But in this day and age, for a teenager, the internet is a masturbation-a-thon.
Again, this is idiotic because it is their TEACHER that they all saw effing multiple guys, etc. Good Lord, is it going to take someone to hammer that bit of info into your brain?
Is your ultimate goal to clean up the internet, and do you think that this would be the first great step?
I think you're going off the deep end now. Let's keep this realistic, kay?
