Page 54 of 69 FirstFirst ... 444525354555664 ... LastLast
Results 531 to 540 of 682

Thread: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to cla

  1. #531
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    07-16-14 @ 01:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    47,571

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    What??? That's just nuts. The MONEY has nothing to do with the degradation of women. That would be things like letting a group of guys circle jerk on you and performing sex acts on them all. THAT is the degrading part. WTF?

  2. #532
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    07-16-14 @ 01:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    47,571

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    Quote Originally Posted by RabidAlpaca View Post
    What if it were her twin that had done the porn? The kids would then be able to see a woman who looked completely identical to their teacher do porn. Wouldn't that be equally as distracting? She should then be fired right?




    Ohhhh!! She was their TEACHER!?? Well I guess that makes this horse of a different color!

    No **** it was their teacher, that was the entire basis of this thread. I've still yet to hear any actual ways that it would disturb class other than "it would" and "it'd probably be distracting".



    She never said a word about it.

    I think you're going off the deep end now. Let's keep this realistic, kay?



    Every single one of those things is a crime. She isn't a criminal.
    I never said she was a criminal. I said her past has ruined her chances at EVER being taken seriously as a teacher. That is how society in general views people who do things like that.

  3. #533
    Global Moderator
    The Truth is out there.
    Kal'Stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry ID USA
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,857
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    What??? That's just nuts. The MONEY has nothing to do with the degradation of women. That would be things like letting a group of guys circle jerk on you and performing sex acts on them all. THAT is the degrading part. WTF?
    Perhaps you missed it but those women CHOSE to do the scenes that they are in. If they do not consider it demeaning then who are you to say otherwise? And the payrate shows that those women are well compensated for the acts they do and it shows that those women no doubt negotiated for that money, which when all combined shows independence, and security in themselves and their bodies. I know some women who are not nearly that secure about themselves (not even counting their bodies), including my wife. I would bet you know of some also.

    If you want to know what the real demeaning of women actually is then talk to Tigger or go visit Stormfront or some radical religious forum...or go to a country like Iran where if a woman even talks to another man without a male family member around or authorizing it they get stoned. You'll see plenty of men demeaning women and know the difference between what happens in a porn and the reality of real demeaning of women is.
    I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang

    My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang

  4. #534
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    07-16-14 @ 01:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    47,571

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    Quote Originally Posted by RabidAlpaca View Post
    What if it were her twin that had done the porn? The kids would then be able to see a woman who looked completely identical to their teacher do porn. Wouldn't that be equally as distracting? She should then be fired right?




    Ohhhh!! She was their TEACHER!?? Well I guess that makes this horse of a different color!

    No **** it was their teacher, that was the entire basis of this thread. I've still yet to hear any actual ways that it would disturb class other than "it would" and "it'd probably be distracting".
    Good Lord! If you're denying that this would be a distraction to the students, then you are just blind, completely blind to the realities of life and how society views certain things and how, yes, doing certain things in your life can completely eff up your future in other areas. That is just a fact of life. This woman isn't special. I'm sure she isn't the first, and she most likely won't be the last to get fired from a job because of something in her past.

    And does anybody actually think that young kids who watched her performance in these films are just going to forget about that? Also, does anyone think that pornography (especially this particular brand) is not harmful in some way on a young boy's views of women?

  5. #535
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    07-16-14 @ 01:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    47,571

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    Quote Originally Posted by Kal'Stang View Post
    Perhaps you missed it but those women CHOSE to do the scenes that they are in. If they do not consider it demeaning then who are you to say otherwise? And the payrate shows that those women are well compensated for the acts they do and it shows that those women no doubt negotiated for that money, which when all combined shows independence, and security in themselves and their bodies. I know some women who are not nearly that secure about themselves (not even counting their bodies), including my wife. I would bet you know of some also.

    If you want to know what the real demeaning of women actually is then talk to Tigger or go visit Stormfront or some radical religious forum...or go to a country like Iran where if a woman even talks to another man without a male family member around or authorizing it they get stoned. You'll see plenty of men demeaning women and know the difference between what happens in a porn and the reality of real demeaning of women is.
    It's demeaning in general. Especially when it is young boys who are the viewers. They are developing their perceptions, and pornography gives them certain perceptions about women in general.

  6. #536
    Global Moderator
    The Truth is out there.
    Kal'Stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry ID USA
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,857
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    Good Lord! If you're denying that this would be a distraction to the students, then you are just blind, completely blind to the realities of life and how society views certain things and how, yes, doing certain things in your life can completely eff up your future in other areas. That is just a fact of life. This woman isn't special. I'm sure she isn't the first, and she most likely won't be the last to get fired from a job because of something in her past.
    No, it would be a distraction. But that distraction is no worse or less than that of them having a teacher that they think is hot and fantasize over.

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    And does anybody actually think that young kids who watched her performance in these films are just going to forget about that? Also, does anyone think that pornography (especially this particular brand) is not harmful in some way on a young boy's views of women?
    No they probably won't. Other children also probably won't forget the hot teacher they fantasized about either. Whats your point?
    I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang

    My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang

  7. #537
    Engineer

    RabidAlpaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    American in Europe
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    14,554

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    Good Lord! If you're denying that this would be a distraction to the students, then you are just blind, completely blind to the realities of life and how society views certain things and how, yes, doing certain things in your life can completely eff up your future in other areas. That is just a fact of life. This woman isn't special. I'm sure she isn't the first, and she most likely won't be the last to get fired from a job because of something in her past.
    So you don't want to answer the twin question? It would be identically disruptive of the class, according to you, so what's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    And does anybody actually think that young kids who watched her performance in these films are just going to forget about that? Also, does anyone think that pornography (especially this particular brand) is not harmful in some way on a young boy's views of women?
    If it were in her employment contract that she could've never been a pornstar before, or if she were asked "Were you a porn star?" prior to employment, then yes, they should've been able to turn her down for that.

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    What??? That's just nuts. The MONEY has nothing to do with the degradation of women. That would be things like letting a group of guys circle jerk on you and performing sex acts on them all. THAT is the degrading part. WTF?
    If that's their career choice, it's none of your business to come along and say "You're degrading yourself". Her decision, and her fat paycheck.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kal'Stang View Post
    No they probably won't. Other children also probably won't forget the hot teacher they fantasized about either. Whats your point?
    Oh man, I can name several. I remember my favorite of all time was Mrs. Wright, and she was right for all the right reasons.
    Last edited by RabidAlpaca; 01-19-13 at 08:58 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by LowDown View Post
    I've got to say that it is shadenfreudalicious to see the rich and famous fucquewads on the coast suffering from the fires.

  8. #538
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    07-16-14 @ 01:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    47,571

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    [QUOTE=RabidAlpaca;1061368898]
    So you don't want to answer the twin question? It would be identically disruptive of the class, according to you, so what's the difference?
    LOL, it's because that is a situation beyond HER control. She didn't do the pornography in that situation. Perhaps it would still be a distraction? Who's to say it wouldn't be?


    If it were in her employment contract that she could've never been a pornstar before, or if she were asked "Were you a porn star?" prior to employment, then yes, they should've been able to turn her down for that.
    I can agree with that. If they don't want "that type" they should specify such.

    If that's their career choice, it's none of your business to come along and say "You're degrading yourself". Her decision, and her fat paycheck.
    You're wrong. If I lived in that community, and my child was one of her students, I would most certainly have a say (one way or another) and it would most certainly be my business.

  9. #539
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    07-16-14 @ 01:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    47,571

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    [QUOTE=Kal'Stang;1061368897]
    No, it would be a distraction. But that distraction is no worse or less than that of them having a teacher that they think is hot and fantasize over.
    Holy smokes! It most certainly WOULD be more of a distraction.



    No they probably won't. Other children also probably won't forget the hot teacher they fantasized about either. Whats your point?
    WOW!

  10. #540
    Global Moderator
    The Truth is out there.
    Kal'Stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry ID USA
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,857
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Judges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    It's demeaning in general. Especially when it is young boys who are the viewers. They are developing their perceptions, and pornography gives them certain perceptions about women in general.
    "Its demeaning in general". IE YOU think its demeaning and therefore it must be demeaning for them and everyone else.

    As for the young boys who are the viewers...how is it demeaning them again? As for their perceptions of women, sorry but reality shows that there are plenty of men who have watched porn when they were kids and yet they still have respect, and show respect towards women. Indeed I would bet that 99% of the men here who have watched porn in their younger years have a healthy respect for women. (would love to say 100% but Tigger sorta blows that away...of course with his perception of the way life should be I've got a feeling he's never watched a porno in his life so maybe I can?)
    I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang

    My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang

Page 54 of 69 FirstFirst ... 444525354555664 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •