The ghost of Jack Kevorkian for President's Physician: 2016
Last edited by Henrin; 01-01-13 at 03:35 PM.
2.) again Sandra Fuxalot concerns me not and is meaningless to the failed poster i commented on
3.) interesting, another meaningless statment that has ZERO to do with anything i said.
is there something you are actually interested in debating?
fact is the poster i commented on is 100% inaccurate and a failure. Let me know if you want to talk about what i actually commented on.
And again I suggest Hobby Lobby go franchise and keep under 50 employees (fire the rest) and offer NO healthcare as an alternative to this federal over-reach. That or the owners take their cash and retire after shuttering the business.
Enough companies do that and the script from the hill will change as the people begin to wake up enough to tar and feather the goobers there now.
Second, the law requires us all to subsidize the sexual activities of others. I'm not cool with that, and there are a lot of Americans who feel the same.
1.) have no clue why this is relevant to anything at all. The topic is, is it right for the company to defy the law and if they shut down like you suggest (in this case) who would be at fault.
many people felt this way before the bill and many feel this way about lots of things
people dont like to pay for healthcare of people who smoke, drink, eat like ****, do drugs and or never exercise too
this isnt anything new, just because now this ONE issues bothers you is pretty meaningless, some dont want anything to go to healthcare because they are against medicine period.
Most would blae the company in this case because they are trying to force their religious beliefs, all they had to do is be smart and come up with something else.