Page 66 of 107 FirstFirst ... 1656646566676876 ... LastLast
Results 651 to 660 of 1067

Thread: NRA Newtown response [W:818]

  1. #651
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    12-29-15 @ 10:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    3,747

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    It's absurd that the NRA is only responding because these were very small, little children. When it was a movie cinema and high schools, I guess the kids weren't young enough... the carnage wasn't bad enough. Why is the NRA only talking about protecting our children, and not about protecting everybody at cinemas and shopping malls as well?

    Is it because they don't have any solutions to offer?
    Your post is foolish, naive, and looney. Too much eggnog for you, it seems.

    It is you who are against protecting anyone. Such as the NRA has always advocated protecting everyone. But as 6 year-olds cannot pack, we need adults to do it for them.

    This is rocket science, eh ?

  2. #652
    Sage
    SheWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,505

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by Eighty Deuce View Post
    Your post is foolish, naive, and looney. Too much eggnog for you, it seems.

    It is you who are against protecting anyone. Such as the NRA has always advocated protecting everyone. But as 6 year-olds cannot pack, we need adults to do it for them.

    This is rocket science, eh ?
    So an average person with a pistol should be expected to take a heavily armed shooter covered in body armor like Holmes?

    That's nonesense

  3. #653
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    12-29-15 @ 10:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    3,747

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    So an average person with a pistol should be expected to take a heavily armed shooter covered in body armor like Holmes?

    That's nonesense
    This is ignorant.

  4. #654
    Sage
    SheWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,505

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by Eighty Deuce View Post
    This is ignorant.
    Want to explain why??

    Even the terrorist that shot a bunch of people to death on a military base, was not shot down. And was a on a ****ing military base. Why didn't any soldiers have the capacity to kill him? Was nobody there armed? That's definitely not a gun free zone.... lol

  5. #655
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Seen
    07-25-17 @ 12:35 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    5,878

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    So an average person with a pistol should be expected to take a heavily armed shooter covered in body armor like Holmes?

    That's nonesense
    'Expected' by who?
    "The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure" - 2006 Senator Obama...leadership failure indeed!

  6. #656
    Student BigRedChief's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    In my mind
    Last Seen
    07-11-16 @ 11:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    200

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by lizzie View Post
    No, you are apparently still having comprehension problems. It's a very simple concept. I want an AR15, I have the money to buy one, I can own one. I can use it for any legal means, regardless of your assumption that I need it.
    I agree. Another citizen telling you its a or it is not a need is ludicrous. that being said there has to be a limit at some point. Do you need a shoulder fired air to air missile? A tank? Bazooka? etc.etc.

    Where is that line? Myself I think that AR-15 is on the permissible side.
    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    The constitution says corporations have some of the same rights as "persons".

  7. #657
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Seen
    07-25-17 @ 12:35 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    5,878

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    Want to explain why??

    Even the terrorist that shot a bunch of people to death on a military base, was not shot down. And was a on a ****ing military base. Why didn't any soldiers have the capacity to kill him? Was nobody there armed? That's definitely not a gun free zone.... lol
    Actually the only ones armed were on the perimeter. The majority of areas inside the perimeter ARE infact ‘gun free zones’…
    "The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure" - 2006 Senator Obama...leadership failure indeed!

  8. #658
    Student BigRedChief's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    In my mind
    Last Seen
    07-11-16 @ 11:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    200

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    Want to explain why??

    Even the terrorist that shot a bunch of people to death on a military base, was not shot down. And was a on a ****ing military base. Why didn't any soldiers have the capacity to kill him? Was nobody there armed? That's definitely not a gun free zone.... lol
    Military bases in the USA are gun free zones. Only police and MP's are allowed to carry firearms.
    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    The constitution says corporations have some of the same rights as "persons".

  9. #659
    Sometimes wrong

    ttwtt78640's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Uhland, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    34,591

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    Want to explain why??

    Even the terrorist that shot a bunch of people to death on a military base, was not shot down. And was a on a ****ing military base. Why didn't any soldiers have the capacity to kill him? Was nobody there armed? That's definitely not a gun free zone.... lol
    Actually the clinic, on base, where the shooting occured, was not "secured" by armed guards. The shooter was shot/stopped by guns and is still paralyzed, from that shooting, as he awaits trial. Why do you "lol" at the deaths of any crime victims?
    The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
    Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman

  10. #660
    Sage
    SheWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,505

    Re: NRA Newtown response

    Quote Originally Posted by Dickieboy View Post
    'Expected' by who?
    Deuce thinks the NRA and society should only protect children from mass shooters, but adults should have to do it for themselves.

    I am just wondering how he expected armed adults to take down a heavily armored James Holmes. What kind of guns should we have have to keep on our person's to kill the next James Holmes? And then course, you have teens and kids getting shot in shopping malls and cinemas, and Holmes killed children too. I guess when school is out, us adults have to guard the kids as well as ourselves.

Page 66 of 107 FirstFirst ... 1656646566676876 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •