I don't live in the movies and if anyone is caught up in a fantasy it's you who've apparently used your years of criminology experience and knowledge to ascertain the exact motives of a killer who's so unbalanced emotionally he's chosen mass homicide as a solution to his problems.
Yep, you've nailed down every psycho killer as a highly trained Special Forces Commando who's first thought after shooing away imaginary flying purple monkeys is to perform a recon of the perimeter and locate and identify possible counter forces. And you don't trust MY reasoning or abilities ?
My reasoning and/or abilities are just fine and a armed law abiding populace is a polite and well protected populace but we have to deal with nonsense from the likes of you as you rattle of hypothetical scenario's with out the slightest concept of what it takes to lawfully own, carry or use a firearm.
Your reasoning is to have the PSYCHO ARMED, and everyone else cowering and waiting to eat a bullet because you're scared of a firearm or don't possess the training or the courage to take it upon yourself to protect your self or the lives of your family.
That's your problem and you need to understand that your cowardice doesn't equate to a disarmed society.
" If no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else ? "
My uncle is a professor at UIC (and a friend of Bill Ayers), on Christmas I'm pulling out the camera and how a guy with a PHD in physics reverts into a child over politics along with the other over dramatic progressives in my family.
Not to mention you already proved my theory by treating me as hostile.
Not to mention - there would be no damn study that would even study the fact that the progressive socioeconomic philosophy breeds crazies because the majority of those able to conduct "institutional" studies are PROGRESSIVES in the first place!
What? You are the guy who came in here declaring, with no proof, a really stupid notion that me and other progressives create mass-shooters... You have absolutely no room to try and play the victim card.Originally Posted by Mr.Nick
Right. You go on the attack, then play the victim card followed by a conspiracy card because you can't proove your politically motivated ridiculous hypotheses of hate. You clearly do not want to be taken seriously.Originally Posted by Mr.Nick
Let me clue you in on something, Progressives did not foster the environment or raise kids to become mass shooters... conservatives did not foster the environment or raise kids to become mass shooters. You playing politics with the lives of people based on completely unfounded and wild political claims is beyond idiotic.
Get this through your skull Mr. Victim... I didn't claim nor do I claim that your political ideology makes mass shooters happen. However, you did claim that of me. So please, stop crying about being attacked and at least try to back up your ridiculous claims beyond "I can't because it's all a grand conspiracy" and "I really don't like my uncle."
For all the noise that the left makes about gun control, I have still yet to see any substantially convincing evidence that gun control would actually WORK.
Until I start seeing some facts, this is all just hyperbole.
B) the officer actually did get a shot off - apparently he missed
C) I agree. There should be a minimum of two.
Meanwhile, given that Conneticut and Aurora's restrictive gun laws apparently weren't much help in deterring homicidal psychos, I'm not terribly impressed with the argument that the problem can be solved by disarming the sheepdogs. Nothing is going to be a panacea - but we keep armed responders in our Courthouses, major public buildings, and around the President 24/7 - because we recognize that that makes these things safer. It's time we made our children safer.
Weak response. The vast majority of those positions are administrative - the growth in administrative positions is something that has been occurring across the board and at all levels of education.To the contrary it shows that you don't know how to read charts. You argued that "administrators" had grown when this chart indicates "non teaching staff" has grown.
Even in relatively small-government Texas the growth looks like this:
Non-teaching staff is administrative. They are handling the administration of that school.
However, the point remains. We are hiring lots of folks whom we probably don't really need, but who don't have as their primary focus the education of children. Let us make some of those hirees veterans who are trained First Responders; and who in the mean time can assist in the library or whatever.
“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”
- Alexander Hamilton. Spiritual father of #NeverTrump