I wouldn't know what it is like to be wrong in this case, since it is you who have been proven to be wrong.
And the only lack of understanding here is yours, as has been proven.
And I haven't ignored a video like you have. Funny thing is, that it is the one that proves you wrong. Go figure. Huh?
There was no swing or blow by Crowder. You are purposely being dishonest.
You can cease your deceitfulness at any time and admit that Crowder did not swing.
And again. The NYT bs has already been addressed.
And one of the reasons I directed you and others to the video in the article of the OP. Because the portion in question isn't edited out.
The guy on the ground doesn't mean he didn't slip and fall on his own.
It doesn't mean that he didn't fall after swinging first.
The guy getting up off the ground does not mean that he did not act violently first.
It does not mean that he did not act violently toward Crowder first.
Do you not understand that?
You, the person being dishonest, saying that Crowder is lying because he says he was trying to stop them from tearing down the tent, is absolutely hilarious.
Because that is exactly what his actions appear to be in the "alternate view" video I provided.
Which is when little short **** Union thug told him not to touch the very Union members trying to tear down the tent.