Page 61 of 66 FirstFirst ... 11515960616263 ... LastLast
Results 601 to 610 of 660

Thread: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

  1. #601
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:53 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    30,276

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Whipsnade View Post
    And you appointed yourself the person responsible for getting the rest of the thread up on the herd eh?Typical winger trait.

    No, as usual the liberal progressive totally misses the point of a post, to completely make up a strawman to knock down...In the words of the immortal W.C. Fields...."Go away boy, you bother me".....
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  2. #602
    Sage
    Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Golden State
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    41,555

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
    I don't claim a cause and effect relationship. I merely wonder whether or not it can be summarily dismissed as mere coincidence.
    I don't think it can either be summarily dismissed nor held up as a cause. We need to examine several issues: Do the foreign workers have to belong to a union? How are the GM cars designed? How competent is the management of that entity? This is a very complex issue, it seems to me.
    "Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud... [he's] playing the American public for suckers." Mitt Romney

  3. #603
    Sage

    Donc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    out yonder
    Last Seen
    12-06-17 @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    9,426

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    You realize no matter how many times you make the statement it still remains a lie according to the bank account of the United States. Please show me the budget surplus in the Treasury Data

    Debt to the Penny (Daily History Search Application)

    why do you continue to perpetuate the lie. Please educate yourself on the budget of the United States and what makes up the deficit?



    Tax Reduction Act of 1997 was in the Clinton second term. Google it and learn something



    Continuing to relive the past only allows you to divert from the present and the disaster called Obama. You probably weren't very old during the Clinton years but that doesn't prevent you today from actually doing some research. You might want to start by googling the Contract with America



    Lying under oath is a felony



    LOL, teabaggers? We saw leadership when Obama had total control of the Congress but then again the leftwing sites you read won't show you how poor that leadership was. BEA.gov, BLS.gov, and the U.S. Treasury will.
    Its laughable that you think that the Tax Reduction Act was a “significant, second term bill“ When unemployment went from 7.3, to 5.3, during CLINTONS FIRST TERM then it only dropped a little over 1%, before the wrecking crew took office (bush two sticks).So tell me why,if the Tax Reduction Act was such a panacea, didn’t it lower the unemployment rate at least as much as the Clinton’s first term.?

    One would think that it woulda given George two sticks a jump on his presidency. Instead, two sticks went from the 4.2% unemployment,that Clinton left, to 5.3%, after his first term.

    SOOoo...tell me how the “Tax Reduction Act”,and the republican controlled congress of his second term helped the Clinton boom along?

    While your in an explaining mood, also explain to me how Clinton’s raising taxes,during his first term hurt the economy?The rest of your post is rightwing nonsense,not worthy of a response.
    The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say

  4. #604
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 12:10 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,270

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Whipsnade View Post
    Its laughable that you think that the Tax Reduction Act was a “significant, second term bill“ When unemployment went from 7.3, to 5.3, during CLINTONS FIRST TERM then it only dropped a little over 1%, before the wrecking crew took office (bush two sticks).So tell me why,if the Tax Reduction Act was such a panacea, didn’t it lower the unemployment rate at least as much as the Clinton’s first term.?

    One would think that it woulda given George two sticks a jump on his presidency. Instead, two sticks went from the 4.2% unemployment,that Clinton left, to 5.3%, after his first term.

    SOOoo...tell me how the “Tax Reduction Act”,and the republican controlled congress of his second term helped the Clinton boom along?

    While your in an explaining mood, also explain to me how Clinton’s raising taxes,during his first term hurt the economy?The rest of your post is rightwing nonsense,not worthy of a response.
    Are you ready to admit that there was no surplus under Clinton? Further I fully understand why you want to divert to Clinton but this is 2012 not 1997. People keeping more of their own money stimulates our consumer economy and grows govt. revenue

  5. #605
    Sage

    Donc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    out yonder
    Last Seen
    12-06-17 @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    9,426

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Are you ready to admit that there was no surplus under Clinton? Further I fully understand why you want to divert to Clinton but this is 2012 not 1997. People keeping more of their own money stimulates our consumer economy and grows govt. revenue


    Bbbutt...What about yer “Tax Reduction Act”?What about the measly 1% drop in unemployment after it was implemented compared to before it was implemented?

    Are you ready to pick up your fail pail and proudly follow your compadres into oblivion?
    The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say

  6. #606
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 12:10 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,270

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Whipsnade View Post


    Bbbutt...What about yer “Tax Reduction Act”?What about the measly 1% drop in unemployment after it was implemented compared to before it was implemented?

    Are you ready to pick up your fail pail and proudly follow your compadres into oblivion?
    Noticed you posted data up to 2006 when the deficit was 412.7 billion dollars. When has Obama had a deficit under a trillion? Tax reduction act of 1997 obviously hasn't been researched by you therefore I will not do the work for you. Suggest you at least try to be non partisan for a change

    You are the one claiming a budget surplus under Clinton and as reported the Treasury doesn't show that. It was a projected surplus based upon assumptions given the CBO by the Congress. DO you know the difference between a projection and actual numbers?

    Don't know what it is about liberalism that creates this kind of loyalty but if there was a surplus the debt wouldn't have grown like it did

  7. #607
    Sage

    Donc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    out yonder
    Last Seen
    12-06-17 @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    9,426

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Noticed you posted data up to 2006 when the deficit was 412.7 billion dollars. When has Obama had a deficit under a trillion? Tax reduction act of 1997 obviously hasn't been researched by you therefore I will not do the work for you. Suggest you at least try to be non partisan for a change

    You are the one claiming a budget surplus under Clinton and as reported the Treasury doesn't show that. It was a projected surplus based upon assumptions given the CBO by the Congress. DO you know the difference between a projection and actual numbers?

    Don't know what it is about liberalism that creates this kind of loyalty but if there was a surplus the debt wouldn't have grown like it did

    very telling.

    Your search - the last republican president with a budget surplus - did not match any shopping results.

    Suggestions:

    Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
    Try different keywords.
    Try more general keywords.
    Try fewer keywords.

    the last democratic president with a budget surplus


    https://www.google.com/search?source...iw=930&bih=593
    Last edited by Donc; 12-17-12 at 03:04 PM.
    The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say

  8. #608
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 12:10 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,270

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Whipsnade View Post
    very telling.

    Your search - the last republican president with a budget surplus - did not match any shopping results.

    Suggestions:

    Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
    Try different keywords.
    Try more general keywords.
    Try fewer keywords.

    the last democratic president with a budget surplus


    https://www.google.com/search?source...iw=930&bih=593
    This is getting ridiculous, if you think we had a surplus then please contact the Treasury Dept. and tell them about it and demand a refund on the debt service that was charged to Clinton and the taxpayers. This is almost like your school telling you that your bank account is wrong and that there is more money in there than you thought. try spending it? The bank, thus the U.S. Treasury has the accurate numbers.

  9. #609
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post

    You are the one claiming a budget surplus under Clinton and as reported the Treasury doesn't show that. It was a projected surplus based upon assumptions given the CBO by the Congress. DO you know the difference between a projection and actual numbers?

    Uhmm dude that chart comes from a report generated in January 2010. So it is not a projection but rather a matter of historical record.

  10. #610
    Sage

    Donc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    out yonder
    Last Seen
    12-06-17 @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    9,426

    Re: Democrats threaten violence on Michigan House floor

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    This is getting ridiculous, if you think we had a surplus then please contact the Treasury Dept. and tell them about it and demand a refund on the debt service that was charged to Clinton and the taxpayers. This is almost like your school telling you that your bank account is wrong and that there is more money in there than you thought. try spending it? The bank, thus the U.S. Treasury has the accurate numbers.
    do you think it is as ridiculous as you implying that the Tax Reduction Act was a “significant, second term bill“ that contributed to Clintons balanced budget?After it was shown to you that the unemployment rate went down by two percentage points during Clinton's first term (WITH AN INCREASE IN TAXES) and only went down one percentage point, with the "Tax Reduction Act"in place. Ohhh-by the way, your lame attempt at diversion to Obama. NOTED.
    The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say

Page 61 of 66 FirstFirst ... 11515960616263 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •