Unfortunately I have allowed you to steer me away from my original argument…Your original point was based on the a presumption that the 'scab' cannot get a better deal than the union for HIS individual compensation. Consider if the 'scab' did individually negotiate a better compensation package AND through fair negotiation discovery the union finds out the 'scab's' package then moves their goal to his should the 'scab' then receive the negotiation fee the union would have justified?
To which your response was ‘I can see this happening in fantasyland’ obviously subliminally admitting failure then diverting me into some rabbit hole…my bad…carry on.
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure" - 2006 Senator Obama...leadership failure indeed!
Do you even know what "right to work" means?
It means that an individual has the right to NOT join a labor union if they don't want to. Which of course means the labor unions will be ripping people off less, and the labor unions don't want that to happen. As a matter of fact labor unions are opposed to "right to work" because they damn well know their unions are nothing more than a racket and if the individual has the right not to join their union they generally wont. They will pocket those union dues instead of the union taking them, they will go to work when the union strikes... You know why? because all hazards the unions claim they're protecting the worker from are already federal law - in reality the unions do nothing more than extort money out of businesses via threats of work stoppages. I suppose their leverage would go away if people had the RIGHT to NOT join a union..
Now, with that said I would be willing to wager my life on the notion that the majority of the simpletons protesting pro-union even understand a damn thing I said, which is pretty funny considering that is probably why they need unions in the first place - because those pro-union clowns in Michigan are absolute idiots, hence they need the labor unions because they would be fired in 2 seconds if they didn't have unions protecting them.
Whether you choose to believe the propaganda is up to you, but you would being a corporatist yourself.
I'm still asking, what does this tangent have to do with the fact that all of this is simply designed to lower wages.
Ah, the Svengali effect. You're not wrong, I'm just making you believe that you're wrong through the power of suggestion.To which your response was ‘I can see this happening in fantasyland’ obviously subliminally admitting failure then diverting me into some rabbit hole…my bad…carry on.
This has been fun, you've made me laugh and all, but I've got many errands to run today. Bye.
It's like you're dreaming of Gorgonzola when it's clearly Brie time, baby. Step into my office.