Which is fine and perfectly valid.
Example:
When will the "North Carolina - @#$% Our Troops in the @$# with a Rusty Pole!" license plates be coming out, lest we not abridge freedom of speech?
Afterall, if some people want "Support Our Troops" on their car, that is a political message, and the opposing message may be a minority view in North Carolina but it's just as valid from a free speech perspective, so we can't have the state endorsing one political message and not the other...
Right?
Or hey, maybe it's not a matter of running afoul of the actual text of the First Amendment. At all. And this is
retarded, which means by extension, so is this judge.