2) It seems the issue people have is that the baby killers have a problem spending on alternative solutions to baby killing - as if preventing abortions is somehow wrong?
3) My argument is very relative considering the fact that the counterargument is that states shouldn't be allowed to spend revenue collected via license plate sales to prevent abortions.
Like I said in a previous post - people are saying its OK for Planned Parenthood to receive state funds to abort babies, yet it is wrong for a pro-life organization to receive funds in order to offer an alternative solution.
The fact that you think simply reading the amendment is enough to understand how it operates tells me everything I need to know about your knowledge (or rather lack thereof) on the subject.
I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang
My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang
But, it's not at all what the thread is about nor is it what the court decision says.
I may be wrong.