• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ann Coulter Says GOP Should Give In To Obama On Taxes: 'We Lost The Election'

That pointless and silly rhetoric that means nothing is not helping.

When you start the OP with

When Ann coulter says crazy is over you better damn well listen.

I dont think the purpose of this thread was to do anything but post pointless and silly rhetoric. Im pretty sure it wasn't to help.
 
But we are comparing ourselves to other tax and spend nations that are also on the brink or actually failed. Isn't that a lot like the Philidelphia Eagles saying we are doing great because we have won more games than the Chiefs? The total number of jobs is down. The median income is down. Home foreclosures are up. Poverty is up. Food stamp usage is up. You are looking at one inflated number and saying "Yipee!" when the reality is this economy sucks. I, for the life of me, don't know why you are celebrating massive failure.

Who was celebrating anything? Nobody has said "Yipee." Why are you suggesting that this is the case? Is there some reason you elected to inflate what people are saying?
 
Do you have a 401K? Do you have stocks? Because if you do, Obama wants to raise taxes on your earnings.
Another con myth.

The dividends and capital gains in 401ks or IRAs aren't taxed in the year that they are earned. They are taxed when you take distributions and then taxed as normal income. The same as it is now.
 
Didya ever think you'd be telling someone they should be listening to Ann Coulter? It's funny that after years of blasting her, calling her all sorts of obscene names, saying things about her hands (which are a little freakish), all of a sudden, because she's said a few things people like, she has cred. Lol.

Well, she is part of your FAMILY:lamo
 
What does the Tea Party stand for and what do they want?

They stand for knownothingism, xenophobia, crank theories about history, science and our constitution, crank economic theories, and scapegoating.

They want the country to devolve to the standard of living circa 1880. They fear modernity and anybody who isn't like them.

That about sums it up -- they are a reprise of the various knownothing movements in US of the past.
 
When you start the OP with



I dont think the purpose of this thread was to do anything but post pointless and silly rhetoric. Im pretty sure it wasn't to help.

The point is the pointless and silly rhetoric of the conservative movement. Your movement is nuts and intellecutally bankrupt.
 
Do you have a 401K? Do you have stocks? Because if you do, Obama wants to raise taxes on your earnings.

90% of Americans have neither, so you're sort of out of touch, once again.
 
You could have fooled me, it seems pretty obvious that he is just obstructing everything that might improve our situation. And it is despite his best efforts that the economy is a good as it is.

0817-biz-EUROweb.jpg

Bravo. The graph is dispositive: austerity is a vast failure and the stimulus worked.

So of course the tea baggers ignore the empirical economic facts and go back to their debt fetishism. It's all they got.
 
So of course the tea baggers ignore the empirical economic facts and go back to their debt fetishism. It's all they got.

If I recall correctly, wasn't it Obama calling Bush "unpatriotic" for increasing the debt by 4 Trillion in 8 years, hell, Obama has nearly doubled it in 4....Oh, and while we are at it, why don't you drop the stupid name calling, it doesn't help people take you seriously.

But, if you would tell us how the Tea Party gets it wrong on the constitution?
 
Didya ever think you'd be telling someone they should be listening to Ann Coulter? It's funny that after years of blasting her, calling her all sorts of obscene names, saying things about her hands (which are a little freakish), all of a sudden, because she's said a few things people like, she has cred. Lol.

A broken clock is right 2 times a day.
 
If I recall correctly, wasn't it Obama calling Bush "unpatriotic" for increasing the debt by 4 Trillion in 8 years, hell, Obama has nearly doubled it in 4....Oh, and while we are at it, why don't you drop the stupid name calling, it doesn't help people take you seriously.

But, if you would tell us how the Tea Party gets it wrong on the constitution?

Bush increased spending across the board while cutting taxes and paying for 2 wars on a Credit card. That was what was unpatriotic. He left us with a $1.4 Trillion deficit Obama has cut the deficit from Bush's 2009 budget every year while winding down the 2 wars and demanding more revenue to help cut the deficit further. No Republican President has EVER cut the deficit in the last century.

200911_blog_mitchell2.jpg
 
Ann Coulter Says GOP Should Give In To Obama On Taxes: 'We Lost The Election' (VIDEO)

"OK fine, let's do that, but in the end, at some point, if the Bush tax cuts are repealed and everyone's taxes go up, I promise you Republicans will get blamed for it," she said. "It doesn't mean you cave on everything, but there are some things Republicans do that feed into what the media is telling America about Republicans."

Someone knocked Ann off the tracks! She rips hannity a new one on this. When Ann coulter says crazy is over you better damn well listen.


Coulter can be an idiot sometimes.People don't elect one party of the other because they want that party to betray their principals and give into the other side's demands. If they did then what would be the point in electing one party over the other. If I vote for a candidate because he is pro-life then I expect that candidate to oppose any pro-abortion spending. If I vote for a candidate is who adamantly opposed to illegal immigration then I expect him to vote against any amnesties/dream acts.If I vote for a politician because he is pro-2nd amendment then I expect him to oppose what anti-2nd amendment loons call common sense gun control.
 
Ann Coulter Says GOP Should Give In To Obama On Taxes: 'We Lost The Election' (VIDEO)

"OK fine, let's do that, but in the end, at some point, if the Bush tax cuts are repealed and everyone's taxes go up, I promise you Republicans will get blamed for it," she said. "It doesn't mean you cave on everything, but there are some things Republicans do that feed into what the media is telling America about Republicans."

Someone knocked Ann off the tracks! She rips hannity a new one on this. When Ann coulter says crazy is over you better damn well listen.

Never really cared what Coulter or Hannity or any of the talking heads had to say - I just don't tune them in. This is hilarious though, considering every liberal in this thread outs themselves as a FoxNews/Hannity/Coulter viewer. :mrgreen:
 
Bush increased spending across the board while cutting taxes and paying for 2 wars on a Credit card. That was what was unpatriotic. He left us with a $1.4 Trillion deficit Obama has cut the deficit from Bush's 2009 budget every year while winding down the 2 wars and demanding more revenue to help cut the deficit further. No Republican President has EVER cut the deficit in the last century.

200911_blog_mitchell2.jpg


Hmmmm....Want to play with graphs do we?

wapoobamabudget1.jpg
 
Bush increased spending across the board while cutting taxes and paying for 2 wars on a Credit card. That was what was unpatriotic. He left us with a $1.4 Trillion deficit Obama has cut the deficit from Bush's 2009 budget every year while winding down the 2 wars and demanding more revenue to help cut the deficit further. No Republican President has EVER cut the deficit in the last century.

200911_blog_mitchell2.jpg

Your chart is about three years old. Why don't you have a look at reality?
 
Coulter can be an idiot sometimes.People don't elect one party of the other because they want that party to betray their principals and give into the other side's demands. If they did then what would be the point in electing one party over the other. If I vote for a candidate because he is pro-life then I expect that candidate to oppose any pro-abortion spending. If I vote for a candidate is who adamantly opposed to illegal immigration then I expect him to vote against any amnesties/dream acts.If I vote for a politician because he is pro-2nd amendment then I expect him to oppose what anti-2nd amendment loons call common sense gun control.

I agree. In reality, no matter what happens here the media is going to blame the Republicans for this President's fiscal irresponsibility. And at the rate the dip**** in chief is going we are all going to suffer immensely in the future. But the media will blame the Republicans. I get Coulter's suggestion, but it isn't realistic in a country whose media is a propaganda arm of the left wing.
 
Thanks for that updated chart. Like I said Obama has reduced the deficit every year. Something Republicans have ever been able to achieve.

Wrong! Please stop being so ignorant of the facts. Obama has not reduced the deficit every year and in fact he has run deficits greater than any other President in history. By the end of Obama's second term he will have incurred more federal debt than all other President's combine, yet you sit there completely ignorant and claim that this President has interest in actually properly managing the country's finances.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/hist.pdf
 
Thanks for that updated chart. Like I said Obama has reduced the deficit every year. Something Republicans have ever been able to achieve.


I think this is a reading comprehension problem going on here....You are aware that the chart shows Obama's deficits massively larger than anything Bush had right?
 
I think this is a reading comprehension problem going on here....You are aware that the chart shows Obama's deficits massively larger than anything Bush had right?

Mac, what you have to understand is liberals want to talk out of both sides of their mouth about the 2009 deficits.
They want to pretend the stimulus wasn't signed by Obama and the 2009 budget wasn't signed by Obama after the Democrats loaded it up with an extra 400 billion dollars worth of pork spending. They also want to claim the TARP repays without claiming the TARP spending. Thats the only way you can attritbute the 2009 budget to Bush.
 
Didya ever think you'd be telling someone they should be listening to Ann Coulter? It's funny that after years of blasting her, calling her all sorts of obscene names, saying things about her hands (which are a little freakish), all of a sudden, because she's said a few things people like, she has cred. Lol.

Liberals will always make ad hominem attacks against those who oppose their juvenile ideas, this time on Ann Coulter, but whenever she debates a lefty she is always the winner. All they have is ad hom, and few are bold enough to discuss the issues she raises.
 
I think this is a reading comprehension problem going on here....You are aware that the chart shows Obama's deficits massively larger than anything Bush had right?

Not if you understand that the 2009 deficit is GW Bush's. He signed the budget for that year. The Right Wing Cato Institute says it best

The 2009 fiscal year began October 1, 2008, nearly four months before Obama took office. The budget for the entire fiscal year was largely set in place while Bush was in the White House. So is we update the chart to show the Bush fiscal years in green, we can see that Obama is partly right in claiming that he inherited a mess
Don’t Blame Obama for Bush’s 2009 Deficit | Cato @ Liberty

200911_blog_mitchell2.jpg
 
Mac, what you have to understand is liberals want to talk out of both sides of their mouth about the 2009 deficits.
They want to pretend the stimulus wasn't signed by Obama and the 2009 budget wasn't signed by Obama after the Democrats loaded it up with an extra 400 billion dollars worth of pork spending. They also want to claim the TARP repays without claiming the TARP spending. Thats the only way you can attritbute the 2009 budget to Bush.

Tell that to the Cato Institute, they disagree.

Don’t Blame Obama for Bush’s 2009 Deficit | Cato @ Liberty
 
Not if you understand that the 2009 deficit is GW Bush's. He signed the budget for that year. The Right Wing Cato Institute says it best

Don’t Blame Obama for Bush’s 2009 Deficit | Cato @ Liberty

200911_blog_mitchell2.jpg


Look, I didn't like everything Bush did either, and Obama did take over a pretty big mess. But, instead of living up to what he said he was going to do, he made it worse.....Even your own chart shows Obama deficits worse than Bush's....I just don't get how liberals can be so blatantly dishonest about this....In Bush's 8 years, he racked up 4 trillion in added debt, in 4 years Obama has racked up over 5 Trillion of his own debt. That is half the time frame, and more debt on Obama....Now during the campaign of 08 Obama called Bush "unpatriotic" for his debt, now I guess its ok though....What a hypocrite.
 
Back
Top Bottom