• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay marriage in Washington state: 279 licenses in first six hours

I'm sorry you feel that way. The issue of SSM meets many people who are more sensitive than others. I suppose I grew a thicker skin over time.

Oh believe me, your insults were not that good. i just take issue with you claiming you are supposedly pro-gay while making insulting remarks at them. Then you try and tell them they are being too thin skinned because they call you out on your lies while you pretend you were being a nice guy. You were a homophobic smart ass, so own up to it and be one. However, if you want to try and stand next to me and tell me you are my friend expect a good nature boot in your ass. Please stop being so butthurt about that because it makes you seem a bit oversensitive. I am just trying to give you a friendly little reminder that you are a jerk just like me. All your whining is just annoying so be yourself from now on, and quit your lying. Either that or stop being so butthurt about things.
 
Oh believe me, your insults were not that good. i just take issue with you claiming you are supposedly pro-gay while making insulting remarks at them. Then you try and tell them they are being too thin skinned because they call you out on your lies while you pretend you were being a nice guy. You were a homophobic smart ass, so own up to it and be one. However, if you want to try and stand next to me and tell me you are my friend expect a good nature boot in your ass. Please stop being so butthurt about that because it makes you seem a bit oversensitive. I am just trying to give you a friendly little reminder that you are a jerk just like me. All your whining is just annoying so be yourself from now on, and quit your lying. Either that or stop being so butthurt about things.
I'm just not going to participate in such a low level of discussion with you. Have a good evening :2wave:
 
I'm just not going to participate in such a low level of discussion with you. Have a good evening :2wave:

Ok, if you don't want to participate in the level of conversation you started by making unfounded insults at the gay community that is your choice. Don't go away mad, just go away. It is not my fault I am better than you and you are so easily butthurt by your own game.
 
I don't care about your source because I'm not having that argument. You like to make claims without sourcing them, and if challenged you will do a quick Google search, but that doesn't change the fact that you spoke from bias, offering evidence only when called on your bias.

You're right Jerry. You don't want to have THAT argument. You want to derail the topic into a liberal vs. conservative issue. Now tell us... why is THAT?
 
Divorce has nothing to do with SSM. It has to do with all relationships that result in marriage, so separating it out to SSM is non-sensical.

Now, the premise that Jerry has presented is that the problem with the 50% divorce rate is that divorce harms the children involved. Jerry is sometimes correct on this. However, at times, divorce HELPS the children, especially when the alternative is to live in a two-parent household where both parents are warring... or one parent is too weak to divorce the other. Though in the big picture, divorce might not be optimal, as I have often said, even a single/divorced parent household is preferable to a two-parent household that is unsafe. And parents who are constantly fighting is just that... unsafe for the children.

Now, what is the solution? I agree that mandatory couples counseling prior to marriage would lower the divorce rate and reduce unhappy home situations. It's not a perfect solution, but it might have a positive impact.
 
I just wanna know one thing.

Will the flaming homosexual parades stop now?
 
Look at this. And yet you choose to marry another man? Please, say it ain't so! What's even worse is that they're celebrating.


Edited for content
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hear you, that's why I'm not far from just saying 'shut it down'. If you don't need a permit to carry a gun then why should need a license to marry? That was just don to track taxes anyway.

The other side of the coin is, if one state's marriage license is good in every state, then my CCW should also be good in every state.

A little consistency is all I ask for.

That's not the case by any stretch of the imagination. States are not required to recognize the marriages preformed by another state, whether they are heterosexual or homosexual, of course everyone recognizes the heterosexual marriages but most do not recognize the homosexual ones.
 
Well one thing we can agree on is that gays have no interest in any notion that marriage is sacred. I agree.

Perhaps no more or less than heterosexual couples. Hard to listen to some of these conservative opponents arguing about the sanctity of marriage, while standing next to their third of fourth wife. The importance of marriage is a personal issue. I hold my marriage to be very sacred, but that's not to say that you or someone else does.
 
Congrats to the people of Washington and their expansion of freedom. This should never have been a freedom to vote on, however I am glad that when the people were faced with an option to vote away freedom, they choose not to.
 
I agree that mandatory couples counseling prior to marriage would lower the divorce rate and reduce unhappy home situations. It's not a perfect solution, but it might have a positive impact.

Roman Catholics do just that same thing, yet many still divorce. I don't think the state should even be involved with marriage so why should classes be required?
 
Well one thing we can agree on is that gays have no interest in any notion that marriage is sacred. I agree.

No one should agree with you on that point because it is simply incorrect. Many gays do have a notion that marriage is sacred.
 
Great job Washington!

You make me proud.
 
Exept gays were never slaves. In slavery, gays were equal. If you were a black gay, you were a slave regardless. If you were a white gay who owned land, you had many freedoms regardless.

I think many black people get offended when gays compare themselves to black-suffrage, which is why so many Blacks voted against ssm right after voting for Obama in the 2008 election.

This ignores the fact that support among the black community for SSM is increasing (Black support for gay marriage growing - SFGate) (After President Obama’s announcement, opposition to gay marriage hits record low - The Washington Post)

Also it ignores the fact that there are black people who are gay!
 
Back
Top Bottom