- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 11,265
- Reaction score
- 2,921
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
No, you don't see. I never said the executives' collective salaries were greater than the collective salaries of the employees.Ok, let's compare. Four exec went from +/-$750k/yr = 3m/yr to 5.4m/yr. Bakers w/80% increase annually would be $133m. OH yes I see your logic now...considering the exec increase is .6% of the debt and the Bakers increase would be 15% of the debt that SURELY would be sustainable...try again
I said their greed is what prevented a deal from being reached.