Do you mean aside from the indisputable fact that it objectively meets all of those criteria? Or how else did you want me to interpret this sentence?
Look, at the end of the day, Mourdock said that all human life is sacred. A Christian said that he believes that all human life, regardless of its origins is sacred.
This isn't worth a hub-bub.
I would disagree with Mourdock only because I'm an atheist, and I think that nothing is sacred. I still that think that all human life has special value, as we are the only known sapient species. I also do not think that a human conceived in less than ideal circumstances is somehow inherently evil or worthy of destruction.
I appreciate that the man has principles. He could probably stand to word things better if he wants to persuade others.
If all life is sacred, and because of that the state must force women to bear children they don't want, even from pregnancies that were caused by physical and emotional violation...
..then all life is sacred, and the state must take control of energy companies in order to provide adequate heating and electricity to all homes and hospitals to ensure that all people live in a comfortable domicile, including during extreme weather conditions, such as blizzards and heat waves
...then all life is sacred, and the state must take control of the health industry and guarantee medical care to all people who are in need of medical care, no matter what that medical care is and no matter the cost and mandate that doctors, nurses, and medical technicians provide it
...then all life is sacred, and the state must take control of agribusiness and ensure adequate food for all people and require people to work on farms to raise crops and on ranches to raise livestock so that everybody may be provided with the amount of food they need to survive
...then all life is sacred, and the state must take control of the housing industry, and provide adequate domiciles to all people so that people have a physical space of safety and privacy where they are not endanger of environmental or other threats and force people to act as construction workers to ensure there is enough of a labor force for the housing need of all the people
...then all life is sacred, and the state must take control of the clothing industry, and provide adequate clothing - including weather gear, footwear, and any kind of safety helmets needed to ensure that people are adequately provided with clothing good enough to protect them from day-to-day environmental hazards and mandate that people labor to provide enough individual pieces of clothing to all people
...then all life is sacred, and public mass transportation systems must be developed to curtail individual traffic accidents, and such public mass transportation systems must be developed enough to prevent accidents, and people must be required to research, develop, and build such systems or face criminal liability.
...then all life is sacred and capital punishment is a moral wrong no matter what actions someone had done against another because when we say "all life is sacred" that includes all who are living, no matter what the quality of that life is.
So if we are going to have the state mandate that women provide life to one they do not want to provide life to, then all others should be required to provide life to all others if we are to maintain the ideals of the sanctity of life to everyone.
I can't stress enough that personal attacks, baiting and flaming will be dealt with. This is your one and only warning.