There should be Instant Runoff Voting
If they do or not is hardly my concern.yep, you told me his views and they provided evidence for exactly what i said lol
Lets make this clear. I came to defending him on want his thoughts were on the topic. Anything outside of that like your thoughts on them is immaterial. Since you admit those are his stances this is done and my job is completed. Your illogical nonsense and your complete ignorance on rights not withstanding.
Last edited by Henrin; 10-26-12 at 02:56 PM.
2.) its not "my thought" its the facts based on what he posts, if you have FACTS that suggest otherwise by all means provide them or simply answer my question i asked you that he is scared to answer. Seems you are too.
3 and 4.) again instead of just making these opinionated falsecalims by all means please provide proof LMAO
If my goal was to make you understand it fully I would be here the rest of my damn life and never get the job done.
2.) translation: you are scared to answer it LOL
A quick caveat. I had a longer response drafted but the browser crashed.
Ultimately, that's fine. The original post was more polite, and as I was parsing and responding, I realized just how trashy and uncivil what I was responding to was.
Brevity seems more appropriate anyway in light of that.
The brain dead are not alive. So no, the dead are not really comparable to the living. That is a significant difference, also.
Perhaps you should work on your own poor rhetorical support for the human rights abuse for abortion before you criticize others? Here, let me help you with that by tearing this nonsense apart.So if you would not mandate that PVS/coma patients be kept alive, your absolutely idiotic demands for the cessation of abortion are ragingly hypocritical. If you would mandate that PVS/coma patients be kept alive, your point is still idiotic (not to mention painfully illogical).
First of all, I don't believe in mandating healthcare services, and especially not for the brain dead. If you want a service, you pay for it. If the patient's wishes were for all possible measures, and this was put into writing or told to a medical power of attorney, by all means, follow those wishes until there are no financial resources left... at which point no one is obliged to provide them for free and someone sometime before then probably advised against going so far. But no one is obliged to request healthcare services and no one should be obliged to give them.
Bluntly, whatever possible relevance you are trying to draw between letting the dead be dead and violently killing someone who is alive... is quite obscure. Hell, just isolate your false equivalency between killing and letting die and you've aready got a logic problem regardless of the specifics of the conversation's context.
There's no hypocrisy in letting someone die who wants to die or for not artificially sustaining the tissues of the brain dead... while also wanting laws to punish inflicting a violent death upon the living. These are almost entirely unrelated concepts and you have done a terrible job trying to link them, which to be fair, was kind of guaranteed when you tried in the first place. Hopefully you won't make such a ridiculous error of logic in the future, but you may also wish to beware Murphy's Law and its various corrolaries... when you go off on a long rant calling others idiots and illogical, you're probably more likely to say something stupid.