What do you mean where I got it from? That is what it is.
:lol: the fact that you cannot see why this is fail is pretty hilarious.
They don't logically contradict. One follows the other.
It does not
logically follow from it. It is merely th estatement people make after they make the initial statement. Logically, it is contradictory.
Yes, you keep saying that.
It's true. If something is inalienable, it cannot be forfeited because forfeiture is alienating.
Legally it is not I suppose.
Naturally it isn't either. Self-defense acts occur all the time in nature without life being threatened.
The definitions.
Hardly false. Its just a no that is not true argument come from you.. Hardly worth my time and hardly of value.
Repeating a comforting lie to yourself is just one way that you've chosen to ignore the demonstrated falseness of your beliefs.
There is no facts you have mentioned from what I have seen.
that is because when you choose not to see, you will not see.
Alright, believe what you will.
I will. And I will continue to use logic and acknowledgement of reality as the basis for my beliefs, rather than building my beliefs upon a foundation of blind trust and willful ignorance.
You mentioned it, did you not?
No, I did not. It was a strawman of your own design.
And like usual I disagree with that assessment.
But my position is based on logic and reason, while your disagreement is based on you sa ying" La la la, I'm not listening, you're wrong! I disagree!".
If you disagree, fine, then provide a logical basis for disagreement, not mindless statements of disagreement.
Perhaps if you explained how the one doesn't follow the other..
OK, but first give me an idea of how ignorant you are of logic so that I may know where to begin. Do you know how something follows from something else logically? If you know the answer to this question, then you should already know how it doesn't follow. If you don't know that answer, then do you know what a logical premise is?
That isn't exactly a who, is it now?
Of course not, but I didn't force you into having the false premise that a "who" must be involved for you to be dead wrong. That was a delusion of your own creation.
I'll inform reality right away that you have the opinion that it does not exist.
No it is not. The history of the country and its tension today says that very clearly.
I am not responsible for your failure to comprehend the difference between like-minded and identically-minded.
Oh so as long as you scorn the outsiders than government created a like minded society. Interesting..
Government's purpose IS to spurn the unlike minded people who are under it's umbrella of power. That's
why, as you so eloquently stated, "If we wish to talk of what society actually does, that is what it actually does."
Its entirely different since what you said it fails to do.
What?
You believe I practice blind faith then.
No, you have
demonstrated that you practice blind faith in the concepts which you are supporting. I am merely pointing it out.
Do you disagree for some unfathomable reason that we go out of our way to end life?
It isn't. It doesn't even attempt to present any logical foundation for a claim of a natural right to life. It merely a statement which mixes a fact with a fiction.
Name one instance of property existing without human society (i.e as a man-made construct) being present. Just one.
So you disagree with it then?
Not just me, the English language disagrees with it.
I really don't get how my definition is fake though. I didn't make it up.
rof if you adopt a definitions that somebody else made up, it doesn't change the fact that it is a fake definition.
For example, If I arbitrarily, and devoid of any intelligence or reason, decide to make up a new definition for the word "transgression" that means" the fur which surrounds a donkey's asshole, and you decide to adopt
that definition of your own, it does not become any less fake.
.
Well then, you are still here because?
I did not engage you, you engaged me. I will not allow your false claims, which have been presented as a rebuttal to my claims, to go unchallenged. I have no problem repeatedly demonstrating them to be false.
Well you are in a good mood.
I always am.
That's kind of my point.