It’s getting worse as more information comes out!
EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say | Fox News
COMEDY 4 ALL! it's a life Philosophy.
Chuck Norris once got bit by a king cobra. after five days of agonizing pain, the cobra died!
Obama and his administration WERE making statements. Problem is, they were knowingly FALSE statements.
Jay Carney, and Susan Rice BOTH said, "There is NO EVIDENCE of a premeditated attack". That's different than saying, "There's a lot of intel coming in, and right now, we simply don't know". They didn't say that. They emphatically said there was NO EVIDENCE of a premeditated attack, and now we know that's not true. They were also quick to say it was about the video, and later had to back track that story, and tell the truth, that it was a terrorist attack.
So, just tell the truth here. It does take time to collect information, so they should of said that, instead of emphatically saying it was a spontaneous attack that stemmed from a demonstration over a video that got out of control. Instead, they chose to lie, and cover up all the intelligence that was coming in real time through the emails, and the live drone feed that they watched!
If this isn't a cover up, it's the worst example of incompetancy I've ever witnessed.
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress & the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."
- Abraham Lincoln
Here's the problem you are having. You assume the White House, the CIA, and the State Department had no idea what caused this attack, for at least 2 days.
We now know that is not true. There is quite a bit of intelligence that we now know came in real time, that pointed to Ansar al Sharia. From the beginning, the State Department reports all included language about a coordinated terrorist attack. None of the State Department reports mention a protest, or a video.
So, think about this. Try not to be partisan here. Intel was coming in real time that suggested terrorism. Within 2 hours, Ansar al Sharia is claiming responsibility. We know that the State Department took that claim seriously, because they issued a warning to "Embassy Tripoli". THERE'S your proof. They knew who was responsible, so they issued a warning to the embassy in Tripoli. That's simply a fact. We know this now.
It's not a mistake to give quick statements about the attacks. They simply could have said, "intel is coming in, and we don't know at this moment who exactly is responsible". That would have settled it. But that's not what the administration did. They emphatically stated that NO EVIDENCE was available that supported the idea of a premeditated attack. Jay Carney said it, and Susan Rice repeated it over and over again. They blamed the video. They claimed to have HAD the reason for the attacks, which was an out of control protest over the muhammed video. They gave a specific reason, and it turned out to be completely untrue.
So, you must conclude that either A) They are covering the whole thing up, or B) They are simply so incompetant, that they don't understand how to say "we don't know yet" as opposed to advancing a false narrative.
Either they are covering up, or they are completely incompetant on how to handle a crisis situation. I know what I believe, because I continue to research what happened. IMO, they lied their asses off, and hoped this would be a non story until after election.