Page 9 of 12 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 119

Thread: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters[W:89]

  1. #81
    versus the world
    Surtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    The greatest planet in the world.
    Last Seen
    06-10-14 @ 03:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,017

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    You claimed that this equaited to an attack on the president.
    Somebody fires a shot into the Presidential campaign office in Denver, no big deal. It was only a bullet that could have killed an employee of our Chief Executive.
    I love the NSA. It's like having a secret fan-base you will never see, but they're there, watching everything you write and it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing that I may be some person's only form of unconstitutional entertainment one night.

  2. #82
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last Seen
    07-11-14 @ 06:21 PM
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    1,025

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    This, this is highly unrealistic.
    My 75/76 type rating ratings tell me otherwise.

    Further, it is no more unrealistic than the NTSB flight data presented through an FOIA request, demonstrating that the alleged Flight 77 could not have possibly struck the Pentagon. It is also no more unrealistic than that same flight data proving that Flight 77 was flown beyond its physical flight envelope without breaking apart in mid-air. It is also no more unrealistic than the bizarre claim that a total neophyte who failed a simple C-172 check-ride, would magically acquire the skills, knowledge, cockpit awareness, systems expertise and tactile sense, to have flown a complex, heavy, commercial, multi-engine turbine aircraft through a flight profile that physically exceeds the structural limits of the airframe itself, before slamming the aircraft into the ground long before getting both the wings and nose virtually at par with the horizon (impossible for Hani and the airframe).

    The calculated positive g-loads taken from the FDR data released by the NTSB, shows that the airframe was at one point experiencing in excess of 9 g's during its pull-out from the dive just after completing a 330-degree right bank turn. The max structural positive g-load limit of the Boeing 757, happens to be no more than +6 g's (those are maximum physical structural limits).

    Any Commercial Airframe designed in the United States, for use in the Transport Category under FAR Part 121, must be designed according to the Federal Aviation Regulations. Those regulations stipulate the maximum limit load factors shall be when designing an aircraft. The regulations call for +2.5g's as the max limit load factor for Transport Category aircraft. So, Boeing is forced to design the airframe a certain way - not merely because some "truther" said so. No doubt, Boeing designs its airframes to exceed the FAR Certification requirements. However, the FDR released by the NTSB, once analyzed demonstrated that the aircraft the data allegedly came from, went well beyond the structural limits that even Boeing itself was prepared to support. And, that is why you have zero OEM press conferences dealing with this issue.

    Unrealistic, in my experience, is a term that tends to come from those who really don't know what realistic actually looks like relative to 911. If the aircraft represented in the FDR released by the NTSB could not have physically flown the strike profile, then it can't possibly have been a Boeing 757-223ER. Which by definition means that it could not have possibly been Flight 77.

    The biggest "conspiracy theory" going, is the Official Story.

  3. #83
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last Seen
    07-11-14 @ 06:21 PM
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    1,025

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    Do you think Hatuey is either a right-winger or a Romney supporter?

    I've got a better question: Does it really matter?

  4. #84
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:24 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,606

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by PW4000 View Post
    I've got a better question: Does it really matter?
    Considering your reply to him, indeed it does.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  5. #85
    Angry Former GOP Voter
    Fiddytree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    25,703

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by PW4000 View Post
    My 75/76 type rating ratings tell me otherwise.

    Further, it is no more unrealistic than the NTSB flight data presented through an FOIA request, demonstrating that the alleged Flight 77 could not have possibly struck the Pentagon. It is also no more unrealistic than that same flight data proving that Flight 77 was flown beyond its physical flight envelope without breaking apart in mid-air. It is also no more unrealistic than the bizarre claim that a total neophyte who failed a simple C-172 check-ride, would magically acquire the skills, knowledge, cockpit awareness, systems expertise and tactile sense, to have flown a complex, heavy, commercial, multi-engine turbine aircraft through a flight profile that physically exceeds the structural limits of the airframe itself, before slamming the aircraft into the ground long before getting both the wings and nose virtually at par with the horizon (impossible for Hani and the airframe).

    The calculated positive g-loads taken from the FDR data released by the NTSB, shows that the airframe was at one point experiencing in excess of 9 g's during its pull-out from the dive just after completing a 330-degree right bank turn. The max structural positive g-load limit of the Boeing 757, happens to be no more than +6 g's (those are maximum physical structural limits).

    Any Commercial Airframe designed in the United States, for use in the Transport Category under FAR Part 121, must be designed according to the Federal Aviation Regulations. Those regulations stipulate the maximum limit load factors shall be when designing an aircraft. The regulations call for +2.5g's as the max limit load factor for Transport Category aircraft. So, Boeing is forced to design the airframe a certain way - not merely because some "truther" said so. No doubt, Boeing designs its airframes to exceed the FAR Certification requirements. However, the FDR released by the NTSB, once analyzed demonstrated that the aircraft the data allegedly came from, went well beyond the structural limits that even Boeing itself was prepared to support. And, that is why you have zero OEM press conferences dealing with this issue.

    Unrealistic, in my experience, is a term that tends to come from those who really don't know what realistic actually looks like relative to 911. If the aircraft represented in the FDR released by the NTSB could not have physically flown the strike profile, then it can't possibly have been a Boeing 757-223ER. Which by definition means that it could not have possibly been Flight 77.

    The biggest "conspiracy theory" going, is the Official Story.
    Again, do you see how a conspiracy theory about a wholly different subject has been interjected into this thread by you rather than an actual discussion about the identity of the shooter in Denver?
    Michael J Petrilli-"Is School Choice Enough?"-A response to the recent timidity of American conservatives toward education reform. https://nationalaffairs.com/publicat...-choice-enough

  6. #86
    versus the world
    Surtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    The greatest planet in the world.
    Last Seen
    06-10-14 @ 03:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,017

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by PW4000 View Post
    My 75/76 type rating ratings tell me otherwise.

    Further, it is no more unrealistic than the NTSB flight data presented through an FOIA request, demonstrating that the alleged Flight 77 could not have possibly struck the Pentagon. It is also no more unrealistic than that same flight data proving that Flight 77 was flown beyond its physical flight envelope without breaking apart in mid-air. It is also no more unrealistic than the bizarre claim that a total neophyte who failed a simple C-172 check-ride, would magically acquire the skills, knowledge, cockpit awareness, systems expertise and tactile sense, to have flown a complex, heavy, commercial, multi-engine turbine aircraft through a flight profile that physically exceeds the structural limits of the airframe itself, before slamming the aircraft into the ground long before getting both the wings and nose virtually at par with the horizon (impossible for Hani and the airframe).

    The calculated positive g-loads taken from the FDR data released by the NTSB, shows that the airframe was at one point experiencing in excess of 9 g's during its pull-out from the dive just after completing a 330-degree right bank turn. The max structural positive g-load limit of the Boeing 757, happens to be no more than +6 g's (those are maximum physical structural limits).

    Any Commercial Airframe designed in the United States, for use in the Transport Category under FAR Part 121, must be designed according to the Federal Aviation Regulations. Those regulations stipulate the maximum limit load factors shall be when designing an aircraft. The regulations call for +2.5g's as the max limit load factor for Transport Category aircraft. So, Boeing is forced to design the airframe a certain way - not merely because some "truther" said so. No doubt, Boeing designs its airframes to exceed the FAR Certification requirements. However, the FDR released by the NTSB, once analyzed demonstrated that the aircraft the data allegedly came from, went well beyond the structural limits that even Boeing itself was prepared to support. And, that is why you have zero OEM press conferences dealing with this issue.

    Unrealistic, in my experience, is a term that tends to come from those who really don't know what realistic actually looks like relative to 911. If the aircraft represented in the FDR released by the NTSB could not have physically flown the strike profile, then it can't possibly have been a Boeing 757-223ER. Which by definition means that it could not have possibly been Flight 77.

    The biggest "conspiracy theory" going, is the Official Story.
    What the **** does this have to do with some asshole shooting at the Denver Presidential Campaign Office?
    I love the NSA. It's like having a secret fan-base you will never see, but they're there, watching everything you write and it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing that I may be some person's only form of unconstitutional entertainment one night.

  7. #87
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:22 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,081

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Again, do you see how a conspiracy theory about a wholly different subject has been interjected into this thread by you rather than an actual discussion about the identity of the shooter in Denver?
    No. No he does not.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  8. #88
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by PW4000 View Post
    My 75/76 type rating ratings tell me otherwise.

    Further, it is no more unrealistic than the NTSB flight data presented through an FOIA request, demonstrating that the alleged Flight 77 could not have possibly struck the Pentagon. It is also no more unrealistic than that same flight data proving that Flight 77 was flown beyond its physical flight envelope without breaking apart in mid-air. It is also no more unrealistic than the bizarre claim that a total neophyte who failed a simple C-172 check-ride, would magically acquire the skills, knowledge, cockpit awareness, systems expertise and tactile sense, to have flown a complex, heavy, commercial, multi-engine turbine aircraft through a flight profile that physically exceeds the structural limits of the airframe itself, before slamming the aircraft into the ground long before getting both the wings and nose virtually at par with the horizon (impossible for Hani and the airframe).

    The calculated positive g-loads taken from the FDR data released by the NTSB, shows that the airframe was at one point experiencing in excess of 9 g's during its pull-out from the dive just after completing a 330-degree right bank turn. The max structural positive g-load limit of the Boeing 757, happens to be no more than +6 g's (those are maximum physical structural limits).

    Any Commercial Airframe designed in the United States, for use in the Transport Category under FAR Part 121, must be designed according to the Federal Aviation Regulations. Those regulations stipulate the maximum limit load factors shall be when designing an aircraft. The regulations call for +2.5g's as the max limit load factor for Transport Category aircraft. So, Boeing is forced to design the airframe a certain way - not merely because some "truther" said so. No doubt, Boeing designs its airframes to exceed the FAR Certification requirements. However, the FDR released by the NTSB, once analyzed demonstrated that the aircraft the data allegedly came from, went well beyond the structural limits that even Boeing itself was prepared to support. And, that is why you have zero OEM press conferences dealing with this issue.

    Unrealistic, in my experience, is a term that tends to come from those who really don't know what realistic actually looks like relative to 911. If the aircraft represented in the FDR released by the NTSB could not have physically flown the strike profile, then it can't possibly have been a Boeing 757-223ER. Which by definition means that it could not have possibly been Flight 77.

    The biggest "conspiracy theory" going, is the Official Story.
    Title 14; Part 121? You're saying those a maximum limit loads?
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  9. #89
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:38 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,344
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Moderator's Warning:
    Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters[W:89]please stick to the topic if the thread, not truther stuff nor replies to truther stuff
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  10. #90
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Moderator's Warning:
    Shot Fired Into Obama Denver Headquarters[W:89]please stick to the topic if the thread, not truther stuff nor replies to truther stuff
    LOL, sorry just got curious.
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

Page 9 of 12 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •