"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. ... It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
-- Adam Smith
Point is, thousands lost their jobs, and thus anyone who believes jobs growth is a task government should perform should not vote for Romney.
I was pointing the foolish but logical extension of your argument. Please, feel free to start babbling about William Ayers, if you feel you must.Yes, I am and never claimed otherwise.
Rather than go with what you think I 'suggest", why not go with what I actually say and then respond to that?
I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK
-I don't trust a man who talks about ethics when he's picking my pocket.- Time Enough For Love - Robert A Heinlein
My avatar created by Feliza Estrada firstname.lastname@example.org