- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I sure can.....to take the high road, to be the more mature party and set the issue to rest. This whole thing started over a few dozen sandwiches at a marital health event. Chick-Fil-A wasn't out "sponsoring hate groups"...they were supporting healthy marriages. The couples attending those events were a hell of a lot more concerned with problems in their own marriages then what gays were up to. The radicals on the pro-ssm side flipped ****, Chick-Fil-A stood it's ground, and now Chick-Fil-A is ending the topic on their terms.I didn't. Can you think of another reason they would change their position?
Chick-Fil-A doesn't have to change a thing in-order to fulfill their promise to not support hate groups. Chick-Fil-A wasn't supporting hate groups in the first place, and Chick-Fil-A isn't changing it's position on SSM. They're just putting the matter to rest.
If pro-ssm wants to think they "won" something, hey, awesome, get down wit'yo baad self, but Chick-Fil-A will no longer be a rallying cry for pro-ssm.
Last edited: