- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 101,819
- Reaction score
- 45,413
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Ummm...
Is THIS supposed to somehow give Obama an excuse?
It is very sad to politicize the murder of an ambassador. ....
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060922863 said:So you trust the Libyans with American's lives? Good thing you're not the national security adviser. Oh wait, she must have trusted them too.
Look, intel specific or not it was naive to keep the Ambassador in an unstable tribal war zone with a hired local militia to stand guard.
No other country in the World is putting up with the heated hatred that the US is or has been since 9/11.
The most dangerous region in the world to be a US citizen is the Middle East. In a volatile country that has just had a revolution and the vacuum of power has created a devolved to local tribal militia's type of governance what were you expecting to happen? The area has violent hardline anti-western groups. Did no one hear of the recent smashing up of WW2 British war graves? The police stated they could do nothing against the powerful heavily armed group involved. Security there is fragile at best.
Remember the cartoon from that small nordic country? The reaction was obvious.
The Ambassador should have never been put in such a sitting duck position. He should have been in a protectable, near the coast, non-urban fort protected by US marines until the heat died down. If not just out of the country all together.
It was neglectful, naive, and crazy to leave him in an uncontrolled city with no military backup which has hardline anti-American militas as well as its moderate elements.
If your being attacked in over 20 countries. Your flag being burned repeatedly in everyone. logically you must accept - these folks don't like us we need to take extra security measures.
An internal review of the policy to leave thats man's life in the hands of an untested militia needs to be undertaken. Its near criminal.