Page 17 of 27 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 270

Thread: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

  1. #161
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    This is not blocking freedom of speech. They are simply bringing him in to analyze if he broke his parole. It would be violation of freedom of speech if the video was taken down by the government.
    Again.....any reason why the Fed is getting involved into this kind of state case? What warrants the Fed looking into the terms of his probation?

  2. #162
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Again.....any reason why the Fed is getting involved into this kind of state case? What warrants the Fed looking into the terms of his probation?
    You think it will have to do with the giant repercussions this video has caused around the world? I would put my money on that....


  3. #163
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    You think it will have to do with the giant repercussions this video has caused around the world? I would put my money on that....
    Of that I am already sure.....but regardless what gives the Fed the Right to step in and take anything away from California State Law? Or if California Law says theres nothing there. Why would the Feds need to look?

  4. #164
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Of that I am already sure.....but regardless what gives the Fed the Right to step in and take anything away from California State Law? Or if California Law says theres nothing there. Why would the Feds need to look?
    How are they "taking away" they are simply lending assistance in a case that has lead to federal workers being murdered.... Im guessing since a federal worker was murdered they are using this as justification to conduct an interview... .


  5. #165
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    08-09-13 @ 08:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,600

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    You think it will have to do with the giant repercussions this video has caused around the world? I would put my money on that....
    The guy was convicted of Identity theft, financial crimes and meth production.. He broke the terms of his parole. He should go back to prison unless he is cnsidered "SPECIAL".

  6. #166
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    How are they "taking away" they are simply lending assistance in a case that has lead to federal workers being murdered.... Im guessing since a federal worker was murdered they are using this as justification to conduct an interview... .
    Again there is no tie to murder with this case. That would be an excuse for the Fed overextending it's jurisdiction. As this guy was already under conviction. They got Checks signed with this Sam Bacillies Name. Yet No one has identifed that individual as even the Producer of the film. Yet they Say Jones gave money to the project. Plus there is those saying it was Finaced by Coptic Christians. Which if that is the case. Then that has nothing to do with this guy.

    Which I am not a legal expert on California Law. I would think California would want first crack at anything that was going down in their State?

  7. #167
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    08-09-13 @ 08:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,600

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Again there is no tie to murder with this case. That would be an excuse for the Fed overextending it's jurisdiction. As this guy was already under conviction. They got Checks signed with this Sam Bacillies Name. Yet No one has identifed that individual as even the Producer of the film. Yet they Say Jones gave money to the project. Plus there is those saying it was Finaced by Coptic Christians. Which if that is the case. Then that has nothing to do with this guy.

    Which I am not a legal expert on California Law. I would think California would want first crack at anything that was going down in their State?
    He says he produced and directed the film.. and the Actors and Actresses identified him.. Plus those who were hired to come in and Dub "Mohammed" over the original sound track all identified him.

    His mentor was Jihad Watch.

  8. #168
    Sage

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    23,358

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by tech30528 View Post
    I don't think it will affect the laws but rather the application of them. This is a thinly veiled breach of Posse Comitatus, and regardless of whether or not it will later be justified, the fact that he was picked up under federal orders because of the film (which he was within his rights to make) will dissuade others from exercising their rights.
    Dissuading someone from doing something that helps the muslim extremists cause and results in riots and injuries and more hatred of America is not really in our best interest? Of course it is. Since when do our interests conflict with our freedoms? Something is wrong with that.
    Last edited by iguanaman; 09-17-12 at 05:41 PM.

  9. #169
    User JoshuaW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    09-24-12 @ 11:51 AM
    Gender
    Posts
    72

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Again.....any reason why the Fed is getting involved into this kind of state case? What warrants the Fed looking into the terms of his probation?
    Why do you keep saying it's a state case?? He's on federal parole for a 2010 bank fraud case. His 97 case for meth was a state case, that's resolved. His current case is federal. I'm going out on a limb here, but I would guess that's why the feds are involved in this case.
    Last edited by JoshuaW; 09-17-12 at 05:52 PM.

  10. #170
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    07-30-13 @ 10:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    428

    Re: Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post


    Just after midnight, authorities descended on the Cerritos home of the man believed to be the filmmaker behind the anti-Muslim movie that has sparked protests and rioting in the Arab world.
    Authorities waited until most media had left for the day.

    On Friday, U.S. courts spokeswoman Karen Redmond said the Office of Probation in the Central District of California is reviewing whether Nakoula, who was convicted on bank fraud charges, violated terms of his probation in relation to the video and its uploading onto the web.

    He had been ordered not to own or use devices with access to the Web without approval from his probation officer - and any approved computers were to be used for work only. "Defendant shall not access a computer for any other purpose," the terms read.
    Restrictions were also placed on him enlisting others to get on the Internet for him.....snip~

    Alleged 'Innocence of Muslims' filmmaker taken in for interviewing by deputies - latimes.com


    Looks like they will find something to arrest him for. Thoughts? Think this will now affect Freedom of Speech Laws?


    I think it will affect people's common sense. Because how do we know that's even him? just because some Libyan cops grab a guy? OK.

Page 17 of 27 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •