If I'm understanding right, if I decided to go on a barbaric rampage and kill people over the Piss Christ or Family Guy then the creators of both works should be held accountable, correct?I simply said that if someone expressed their views in such a way as to incite riots, that person can be held accountable for any damage it causes.
Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates
Your credibility tank is running low by the time you made that last claim.
One thing that gets ignored in this is that in a lot of countries without free speech, many don't understand American free speech, so when **** like the movie comes out, it may seem like it is "government-approved" as it would have to be if it came out in a country with censorship. Just thought it's a point worth addressing.
"Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough."
The nature of warfare dictates that the bravest and most adacious die firstest and the mostest. Eventually, that natural process leaves one side with no one that is willing to wage war.
The question is, if it is just a small number why can't the larger number control them? It's not as though they are trying to hide what they're doing
A few signs will only fool those who want to be fooled, who will continue to make excuses for the the rabble.
"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without."
~Dwight D. Eisenhower
Libyan official says Benghazi attack was an organized, 2-part attack by militants on Americans - The Washington Post
The second assault took place several hours later and targeted the safe house — a villa inside the grounds of the city’s equestrian club — killing two Americans and wounding a number of Libyans and Americans.
Also, I didn't say the American soldiers lost the Iraq war. The Iraq war was doomed from the start. Our soldiers did the best they could. THey were put into a losing situation.
They didn't say speech which incites violence or a riot is illegal. If you wish to make it illegal, that's a different choice. And that the reasons behind that wish are just as valid when it comes to the abortionist and the violence abortion incites.
2001-2008: Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.
2009-2016: Dissent is the highest form of racism.
2017-? (Probably): Dissent is the highest form of misogyny.