- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 12,177
- Reaction score
- 7,551
- Location
- Ft. Campbell, KY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
This seems a little more than criticism, but more of a hate speech to me. Then you say "may" which you admit you have no proof of anything but gladly spew your criticism. Then you make a statement as though it is fact, that it was the film maker that killed the Americans. What BS. Here you are apologizing to the terrorists that actually killed our fellow Americans, by stating if it were not for someone practicing our right of free speech these terrorists would not have killed. You blame the film maker who has the right of free speech for killing fellow Americans in Libya. No that is really something.
Wiseone quote:
"trash the hate spewing, instigators of violence and cowardly worms they really are. Men who thought their petty little games were worth the violence they surely knew may come from their actions, which resulted in the death of four Americans. If it were not for men like these, provoking others to violence for no reason other than some hate filled beliefs and sick pleasure in it, this would have never have happened, those Americans would be alive and the fundamentalists and extremists who are our enemy would not have a powerful propaganda tool to use to inflict damage and death upon America."
I further recall a cartoonists over in Europe, that was threatened to be killed because he made a simple cartoon about some Muslims.
Apologizing? I'm not an apologist unless you think joining the Army translate to an apology. The point I was trying to make was that just because you can say something because of free speech, doesn't give you the right for that speech to free of criticism. I am just as free to criticize this message as he is to make it.
I blame the film makers for knowingly giving ammunition to our enemies, and I blame our enemies for using it against us. Make sense?