Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 106

Thread: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

  1. #71
    Sage
    Ikari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 01:05 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    54,124

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Caine View Post
    We have no way of knowing any of that from a short clip of the officer running up to him and hitting him.
    Well if one shot and one shot only was fired, we know the cop is lying.
    You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo

    Quote Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
    "I should have loved freedom, I believe, at all times, but in the time in which we live I am ready to worship it."

  2. #72
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,607

    Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    Well if one shot and one shot only was fired, we know the cop is lying.
    That is also a true statement. Obviously the cop didn't mean to discharge his weapon but he DID mean to clock the guy in the dome with his weapon and just happened to have his finger on the trigger. Regardless of what occurred before the video recorded them, he definitely lied about the guy reaching for his gun causing the discharge.

  3. #73
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    Well if one shot and one shot only was fired, we know the cop is lying.
    This agree 100%

    If only one shot was fired "somebody gots some explainin' to dooooo"

    and that explain wont be good enough and he should lose his badge and be prosecuted
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  4. #74
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    That is also a true statement. Obviously the cop didn't mean to discharge his weapon but he DID mean to clock the guy in the dome with his weapon and just happened to have his finger on the trigger. Regardless of what occurred before the video recorded them, he definitely lied about the guy reaching for his gun causing the discharge.
    that confuses me?
    you say that "if" the cops gun only discharged once then yes the cop is lying, which I totally agree

    but then you say regardless of what occurred before the video the cop definitely lied?

    uhm but IF the gun discharged twice, once of camera, couldnt that have been when he reached for it before he started running?

    again not saying thats what happened by any means, just saying the video doesnt prove the guy "never" reached for the gun and it discharged until we know the number of times it did.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  5. #75
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,607

    Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    that confuses me?
    you say that "if" the cops gun only discharged once then yes the cop is lying, which I totally agree

    but then you say regardless of what occurred before the video the cop definitely lied?

    uhm but IF the gun discharged twice, once of camera, couldnt that have been when he reached for it before he started running?

    again not saying thats what happened by any means, just saying the video doesnt prove the guy "never" reached for the gun and it discharged until we know the number of times it did.
    To me It would not be relevant. The cop lied about the discharge. Even IF they later wrasses over the weapon, the fact is he used his gun as a baton and it discharged. Cop didn't say "I pursued him and smacked him on the head with my weapon and in doing so accidentally discharged my weapon". If he had, we would be having a completely different conversation.

  6. #76
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    To me I would no be relevant. The cop lied about the discharge. Even IF they later wrasses over the weapon, the fact is he used his gun as a baton and it discharged. Cop didn't say "I pursued him and smacked him on the head with my weapon and in doing so accidentally discharged my weapon". If he had, we would be having a completely different conversation.
    huh?
    but if there were TWO discharges he wouldnt have lied?
    im still confused?

    have you seen an official police report or cop statement?

    what Im saying is if that if the gun discharged twice, once BEFORE the video, this video proves nothing besides (im guessing by procedure) he used his gun as an impact weapon improperly.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  7. #77
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,607

    Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    huh?
    but if there were TWO discharges he wouldnt have lied?
    im still confused?

    have you seen an official police report or cop statement?

    what Im saying is if that if the gun discharged twice, once BEFORE the video, this video proves nothing besides (im guessing by procedure) he used his gun as an impact weapon improperly.
    All we have to go on but all we have to go on is what we know. Cop smacked individual a with weapon and accidentally discharged said weapon. It didn't go off because the guy reached for it, it went off because cops rings was on the trigger when he hit the guy in the head.

  8. #78
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    1.)All we have to go on but all we have to go on is what we know.
    2.) Cop smacked individual a with weapon and accidentally discharged said weapon.
    3.) It didn't go off because the guy reached for it,
    4.) it went off because cops rings was on the trigger when he hit the guy in the head.

    1.) agree 100%
    2.) agree 100%
    3.) disagree 100% it didnt go off in the VIDEO because he reached for it
    4.) agree 100%

    the whole point is the video only FACTUALLY proves 3 of the things you said above not all 4
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  9. #79
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    This agree 100%

    If only one shot was fired "somebody gots some explainin' to dooooo"

    and that explain wont be good enough and he should lose his badge and be prosecuted
    It was pointed out pages ago the gun was fired only once. Pages. Ago.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

  10. #80
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    It was pointed out pages ago the gun was fired only once. Pages. Ago.
    who was it pointed out by?
    you, just you LMAO

    as others have said "if" true then the cop has some explaining to do
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •