Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 106

Thread: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

  1. #51
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    and until you posted the NEW link there was ZERO evidence of it and technically there still isnt unless thats the official police statement and not hear say AND we know for a fact his gun only discharged ONCE

    what if it discharged twice? and we saw the second one?

    so tell me the cool line about ignorant again LOL
    You asked about what the video proved and in response I said:

    "The cop's weapon discharged. In order to explain it the cop claim Dorm assaulted him and tried to take his gun. The video proves Dorm never made a move and was walking when the cop came up behind him and pistol whipped him, accidentally firing at the same time."

    You responded by saying the video doesn't prove that. How. I have no freaking clue because it clearly shows the cop hit him when Dorm didn't even raise a single hand.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

  2. #52
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    No, the video proves that the gun went off once when the officer struck the kid in the back of the skull. Now this does place DOUBT on the officer's testimony, significant doubt. But if more than one bullet was fired, then it is possible that prior to the video the kid went for the gun and it discharged. If the cop said only 1 round was fired, then yes that absolutely would prove his defense and testimony absolutely false. Was that the claim? If so, then it is assured that these cops did significant wrong doing and should be behind bars.
    His gun discharged once. For the 18th freaking time he tried to claim his gun discharged because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. The video clearly proves that did not happen. I think some of you spend so much time trying to pick things apart you can't see some of the most obvious facts.

    Dorm was released from jail as soon as the prosecutors saw the tape and a couple of weeks later the cop was charged with second degree assault. It should be attempted murder.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

  3. #53
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire X View Post
    There will be lawyers on both sides, and they will all be getting paid. Problem?
    Yes. Lawyers that feed off the misery of others are somewhere between cockroaches and maggots.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

  4. #54
    Sage
    Ikari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 01:05 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    54,124

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    His gun discharged once. For the 18th freaking time he tried to claim his gun discharged because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. The video clearly proves that did not happen. I think some of you spend so much time trying to pick things apart you can't see some of the most obvious facts.

    Dorm was released from jail as soon as the prosecutors saw the tape and a couple of weeks later the cop was charged with second degree assault. It should be attempted murder.
    I didn't come in at the beginning of the argument. If the gun discharged once and the claim by the cops was that the single discharge occurred when the kid went for it, that absolutely this video proves they are lying. And in that case, not only should the city pay big to these kids, those "cops" should get 30 years in federal pound me up the ass prison.
    You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo

    Quote Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
    "I should have loved freedom, I believe, at all times, but in the time in which we live I am ready to worship it."

  5. #55
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,808

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    You asked about what the video proved and in response I said:

    "The cop's weapon discharged. In order to explain it the cop claim Dorm assaulted him and tried to take his gun. The video proves Dorm never made a move and was walking when the cop came up behind him and pistol whipped him, accidentally firing at the same time."

    You responded by saying the video doesn't prove that. How. I have no freaking clue because it clearly shows the cop hit him when Dorm didn't even raise a single hand.
    no it doesnt to anybody honest, logical and rational, what happened before the video?
    do you know for a fact nothing happened before the video?

    LMAO again the video alone doesnt prove/disprove anything yet

    it shows the gun go off but what if the official reports form the multiple cops say it went off twice? lol
    what if the assault happened before the video?
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  6. #56
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York, New York
    Last Seen
    03-11-16 @ 11:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    551

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    Yes. Lawyers that feed off the misery of others are somewhere between cockroaches and maggots.
    Good luck with that.

  7. #57
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,808

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    I didn't come in at the beginning of the argument. If the gun discharged once and the claim by the cops was that the single discharge occurred when the kid went for it, that absolutely this video proves they are lying. And in that case, not only should the city pay big to these kids, those "cops" should get 30 years in federal pound me up the ass prison.

    LOL
    office space movie line NICE!

    and I agree
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  8. #58
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,808

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    His gun discharged once. For the 18th freaking time he tried to claim his gun discharged because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. The video clearly proves that did not happen. I think some of you spend so much time trying to pick things apart you can't see some of the most obvious facts.

    Dorm was released from jail as soon as the prosecutors saw the tape and a couple of weeks later the cop was charged with second degree assault. It should be attempted murder.
    guess you should make better posts with all the facts then huh?
    LOL the problem is WE (the some of us) that you are talking about are only taking things for what is actually being shown here and that is not "obvious" facts based on what you have posted LOL
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  9. #59
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,808

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    this is how simply it is

    I still stand by everything I have said

    if you disagree prove anything I said factually wrong with the info you have posted already.

    should be simple right since you posted "obvious facts" lol
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  10. #60
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    no it doesnt to anybody honest, logical and rational, what happened before the video?
    do you know for a fact nothing happened before the video?

    LMAO again the video alone doesnt prove/disprove anything yet

    it shows the gun go off but what if the official reports form the multiple cops say it went off twice? lol
    what if the assault happened before the video?
    The cop's gun discharged once.

    Read that about twenty five more times but I know you won't because you refuse to admit you made a mistake when you claimed the video did not prove what I said.

    That is why I started with the fact:

    The cops gun discharged. Any logical rational person would see that as saying it discharged ONCE and especially.......

    Never mind.....don't have the patience for your games.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •