Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 106

Thread: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

  1. #41
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    no I can not be racists against blacks because I am one LOL
    also no matter what NEW info you provide I wont have to do any back tracking because everything I said is true and factual

    and the other things I have said I pointed out that they MIGHT be or MIGHT not be true.

    I stand by everything I said because with the info provided its all true and factual, if you disagree please point out what I said isnt true and factually prove its false LOL

    Ill now read this new link
    I already pointed out the cop claimed his gun went off because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. You then claimed the video doesn't prove that is false. The video proves that is absolutely completely false.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

  2. #42
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York, New York
    Last Seen
    03-11-16 @ 11:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    551

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    This is why we have lawyers.

  3. #43
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    ahhh so in this small story it actually says the cop say his gun discharged during him being assaulted, now that is useful if hiis gun only discharged once and it is true the cop put that in his statement.

    Again though NOTHING that I said has changed
    You are unbelievably arrogant. I pointed out on the last page the cop lied about why his gun discharged and you said the video doesn't prove that.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

  4. #44
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,807

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    So it's not indication that they had done anything wrong. What we know is that he was thrown in jail, apparently those charges didn't pan out, an off duty cop pistol whipped him from behind. That casts doubt on the officer's actions, not the civilians. And what this states is that there is serious allegation of gross misconduct and abuse of power on the part of the cops and enough evidence to cast doubt on their claims. As such, full investigation is warranted and it must be taken seriously. If what the kids say is true it's falsifying records, giving false testimony and false imprisonment on behalf of the cops. That sort of abuse of power is significant and would warrant substantial jail time if true. As such, we MUST find out if it is true.
    agreed and I have already said similar things

    but the point is the video doesnt prove anything false yet without knowing the cops full statements

    the video only proves ONE misconduct (and im guessing about this) and that is using your gun as a impact weapon. the video alone doesnt prove anythig else "yet"

    and if the cop is guilty the way the kid says, he absolutely should go to jail and have his badge taken forever
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  5. #45
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire X View Post
    This is why we have lawyers.
    That video means a lawyer is just there for the paperwork, including the ones with the dead presidents.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

  6. #46
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,807

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    I don't actually think that's true. I think one could be racist against blacks even if they were black. Not that it would be true for you, I'm just saying in general it is still possible and given the number of people in the world, it probably has happened a few times.
    well I DID see a black skin head on Jerry Springer one time so I guess yes its "possible" but its probably a serious mental disorder

    I am, like you said however not lol
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  7. #47
    Sage
    Ikari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 01:05 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    54,124

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    I already pointed out the cop claimed his gun went off because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. You then claimed the video doesn't prove that is false. The video proves that is absolutely completely false.
    No, the video proves that the gun went off once when the officer struck the kid in the back of the skull. Now this does place DOUBT on the officer's testimony, significant doubt. But if more than one bullet was fired, then it is possible that prior to the video the kid went for the gun and it discharged. If the cop said only 1 round was fired, then yes that absolutely would prove his defense and testimony absolutely false. Was that the claim? If so, then it is assured that these cops did significant wrong doing and should be behind bars.
    You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo

    Quote Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
    "I should have loved freedom, I believe, at all times, but in the time in which we live I am ready to worship it."

  8. #48
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,807

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    You are unbelievably arrogant. I pointed out on the last page the cop lied about why his gun discharged and you said the video doesn't prove that.
    and until you posted the NEW link there was ZERO evidence of it and technically there still isnt unless thats the official police statement and not hear say AND we know for a fact his gun only discharged ONCE

    what if it discharged twice? and we saw the second one?

    so tell me the cool line about ignorant again LOL
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  9. #49
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,807

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    No, the video proves that the gun went off once when the officer struck the kid in the back of the skull. Now this does place DOUBT on the officer's testimony, significant doubt. But if more than one bullet was fired, then it is possible that prior to the video the kid went for the gun and it discharged. If the cop said only 1 round was fired, then yes that absolutely would prove his defense and testimony absolutely false. Was that the claim? If so, then it is assured that these cops did significant wrong doing and should be behind bars.
    exactly which is my point, a 3-5 second video doesnt prove anything yet without official statements etc
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  10. #50
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York, New York
    Last Seen
    03-11-16 @ 11:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    551

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    That video means a lawyer is just there for the paperwork, including the ones with the dead presidents.
    There will be lawyers on both sides, and they will all be getting paid. Problem?

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •