Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 106 of 106

Thread: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

  1. #101
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Furiounova View Post
    The links have been provided. You have just proven your posts aren't worth reading on this or any other thread. Continue your dumbass games of saying the evidence has not been provided.
    its seems you have trouble understanding the difference between your opinioin and how you feel vs facts

    nothing you have previously provide prove my statement wrong in the slightest bit, not one single thing

    again if you disagree please point it out LOL

    here is my statement again: read it slow "THE VIDEO ALONE DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING"

    this is 100% fact

    when you have something that factually proves otherwise please post it, again Ill keep waiting.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  2. #102
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,600

    Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    1.) agree 100%
    2.) agree 100%
    3.) disagree 100% it didnt go off in the VIDEO because he reached for it
    4.) agree 100%

    the whole point is the video only FACTUALLY proves 3 of the things you said above not all 4
    That's all I need to or care to prove at this point in time. I stated I don't know what happened prior to the event. That's all hearsay. I DO know what happened during the event. Cop messed up.

  3. #103
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    04-14-17 @ 01:28 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,237

    Re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    its seems you have trouble understanding the difference between your opinioin and how you feel vs facts

    nothing you have previously provide prove my statement wrong in the slightest bit, not one single thing

    again if you disagree please point it out LOL

    here is my statement again: read it slow "THE VIDEO ALONE DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING"

    this is 100% fact

    when you have something that factually proves otherwise please post it, again Ill keep waiting.
    Keep trolling.....the links provided explain it all.
    My main function as a Christian is to be the biggest possible jerk as a demonstration of the awe found in God's Grace and Forgiveness. (That love part comes in to play at some point)

  4. #104
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    Re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    That's all I need to or care to prove at this point in time. I stated I don't know what happened prior to the event. That's all hearsay. I DO know what happened during the event. Cop messed up.
    I agree with this 100%
    and I agree that the cop messed up because from my understanding you are never to use your gun as an impact weapon
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  5. #105
    Sage
    Caine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    10-05-17 @ 01:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    23,336

    Re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Objective-J View Post
    This agree 100%

    If only one shot was fired "somebody gots some explainin' to dooooo"

    and that explain wont be good enough and he should lose his badge and be prosecuted
    He has some explaining to do anyways. There is no reason to run up and hit someone in the head with your firearm.
    "I condemn the ideology of White Supremacy and Nazism. They are thugs, criminals, and repugnant, and are against what I believe to be "The American Way" "
    Thus my obligatory condemnation of White supremacy will now be in every post, lest I be accused of supporting it because I didn't mention it specifically every time I post.

  6. #106
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    Re: Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

    Quote Originally Posted by Caine View Post
    He has some explaining to do anyways. There is no reason to run up and hit someone in the head with your firearm.
    I said that as far as I know procedure wise you cant use your gun as an impact weapon

    and it may also be against "procedure" but in my OPINION if an assault/scuffle happened before the video It wouldnt bother me personally if hr used a night stick, mace, tazer etc

    but like I said thats just my opinion I think its be a good reason to make sure he was subdued IF that happened and IF it was against procedure
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •