• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

The links have been provided. You have just proven your posts aren't worth reading on this or any other thread. Continue your dumbass games of saying the evidence has not been provided.

its seems you have trouble understanding the difference between your opinioin and how you feel vs facts

nothing you have previously provide prove my statement wrong in the slightest bit, not one single thing

again if you disagree please point it out LOL

here is my statement again: read it slow "THE VIDEO ALONE DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING"

this is 100% fact

when you have something that factually proves otherwise please post it, again Ill keep waiting.
 
1.) agree 100%
2.) agree 100%
3.) disagree 100% it didnt go off in the VIDEO because he reached for it
4.) agree 100%

the whole point is the video only FACTUALLY proves 3 of the things you said above not all 4

That's all I need to or care to prove at this point in time. I stated I don't know what happened prior to the event. That's all hearsay. I DO know what happened during the event. Cop messed up.
 
its seems you have trouble understanding the difference between your opinioin and how you feel vs facts

nothing you have previously provide prove my statement wrong in the slightest bit, not one single thing

again if you disagree please point it out LOL

here is my statement again: read it slow "THE VIDEO ALONE DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING"

this is 100% fact

when you have something that factually proves otherwise please post it, again Ill keep waiting.

Keep trolling.....the links provided explain it all.
 
That's all I need to or care to prove at this point in time. I stated I don't know what happened prior to the event. That's all hearsay. I DO know what happened during the event. Cop messed up.

I agree with this 100%
and I agree that the cop messed up because from my understanding you are never to use your gun as an impact weapon
 
This agree 100%

If only one shot was fired "somebody gots some explainin' to dooooo"

and that explain wont be good enough and he should lose his badge and be prosecuted

He has some explaining to do anyways. There is no reason to run up and hit someone in the head with your firearm.
 
He has some explaining to do anyways. There is no reason to run up and hit someone in the head with your firearm.

I said that as far as I know procedure wise you cant use your gun as an impact weapon

and it may also be against "procedure" but in my OPINION if an assault/scuffle happened before the video It wouldnt bother me personally if hr used a night stick, mace, tazer etc

but like I said thats just my opinion I think its be a good reason to make sure he was subdued IF that happened and IF it was against procedure :shrug:
 
Back
Top Bottom