• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Court: Texas can cut off Planned Parenthood funds[W:104, W:111]

No. Neither are the founders of the KKK currently running their organization.



yup. take a look at the abortion rates for kids with down syndrome, or even black children v white children.

The kkk analogy was pretty dumb man.
 
Is it your purpose then to drive people away from Christianity?

I thought people would appreciate a little honesty compared to all the Christians who pretend to be perfect and snub their nose at everyone else.
 
I thought people would appreciate a little honesty compared to all the Christians who pretend to be perfect and snub their nose at everyone else.

So your tactic is to deliberately be a jerk in order to associate jerkiness with Christ.


Yeah, I think you may want to think of a different tack, there.....
 
Moderator's Warning:
cp, Furi, tone it down.
 
wow. your behavior in this thread certainly goes a long way towards demonstrating to the rest of us the peace and gracefullness of the Christ you claim in your signature.

His signature is there to openly ridicule and degrade the Christian faith. Which I thought was against the DP rule 18. But he's had it for a while now so I guess not. Or maybe Christian isnt a religion anymore.

Hate Messages - Hate Messages delivered via threads, posts, signatures, or PM's are forbidden at Debate Politics. The Moderator Team defines a hate message as any willful wording intended to ridicule, debase, degrade, intimidate, or incite violence and/or prejudicial actions against a group of people based on their race, gender (including transgendered), ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability.
 
His signature is there to openly ridicule and degrade the Christian faith. Which I thought was against the DP rule 18. But he's had it for a while now so I guess not. Or maybe Christian isnt a religion anymore.

Hate Messages - Hate Messages delivered via threads, posts, signatures, or PM's are forbidden at Debate Politics. The Moderator Team defines a hate message as any willful wording intended to ridicule, debase, degrade, intimidate, or incite violence and/or prejudicial actions against a group of people based on their race, gender (including transgendered), ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability.

That is not the purpose of my sig in any way at all. Your horrible interpretation changes nothing.
 
His signature is there to openly ridicule and degrade the Christian faith. Which I thought was against the DP rule 18. But he's had it for a while now so I guess not. Or maybe Christian isnt a religion anymore.

Ah. I was making the mistake of taking him seriously.
 
His signature is there to openly ridicule and degrade the Christian faith. Which I thought was against the DP rule 18. But he's had it for a while now so I guess not. Or maybe Christian isnt a religion anymore.

Hate Messages - Hate Messages delivered via threads, posts, signatures, or PM's are forbidden at Debate Politics. The Moderator Team defines a hate message as any willful wording intended to ridicule, debase, degrade, intimidate, or incite violence and/or prejudicial actions against a group of people based on their race, gender (including transgendered), ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability.

Ah. I was making the mistake of taking him seriously.

What is your intent of mocking the faith of millions? It is a hateful signature. You are mocking Christianity. You have been for a while now.

well what is it's purpose?

Moderator's Warning:
Furiounova's signature is not the topic of this thread. Cut it out, cease the personal comments and get back on topic. No more warnings.
 
With our up-and-coming health care coverage mandate, what would be the reason for funding PP in the first place? It has traditionally been a provider of services for low-income people, who wanted affordable birth control and gyn visits. If we're all covered now that health care coverage is required, there should be no need for PP anyway.
Because Texas in particular, courtesy of Rick Perry and Greg Abbot, rejected all the federal funding.
 
Because Texas in particular, courtesy of Rick Perry and Greg Abbot, rejected all the federal funding.

I will never understand the anti choice crowd for one simple reason: the kids who have already been born and are hungry, homeless, and/or abused appear invisible.

I really think the anti choice crowd is largely made up of people who want to appear as caring about kids.
 
No. Neither are the founders of the KKK currently running their organization.

And the current members of the KKK don't profess to racist beliefs?



yup. take a look at the abortion rates for kids with down syndrome, or even black children v white children.

Take a look at the gap between blacks and whites. Does that prove that US government and businesses are all racists?
 
Back
Top Bottom