I think this delves into the interesting question, and one that hasn't been touched on by the courts in quite some time, of what the threshold is for fraud vs. free speech. Is it my right to lie and claim I am an attorney or a doctor by asserting my right to free speech? Am I infringing on the rights of the American Bar Association or the American Medical Association by doing so? How did they acquire the right to define what is a lawyer and a doctor, and furthermore why do I need their approval to perform any of the aforementioned jobs if I can find someone willing to accept my services? This can go on and on. I don't necessarily agree with even one point raised, but I think it is an interesting line of reasoning and questioning that is a good exercise in determining if there even should be limits on free speech.