Neither side in an argument can find the truth when both make an absolute claim on it.
I mean; look: if something were to really go down, requiring every able bodied guy / gal . . . (oops), don't you think that general recruitment into instant militias and access to armories would happen forthwith? (where ya' get all the toys ya' need) I just think that it only makes good sense; particulalry in urban and heavily populated suburban areas to quell the John Wayne exageration which seems to be a driving force in conservative circles.
You can dance without a lawyer
so if a person has a clean record and no court history of mental incompetence just what is your solution
if you buy more than one handgun within 5 business days from the same dealer the ATF has to be notified.
You seem to be one of those people who cannot fathom a problem without a tidy neat packaged solution
in this case there is none and many of us realize that rather than flying off the handle and screaming that WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING
Seems, like everytime I mention a tighter gun control somebody automaticly brands me as anti gun, or thinks I want to do away with all guns in America .
This is simply not true I can not speak for others who want stricter gun control but for me I say put the guns in the hands of responsible honest people and take them away from nut jobs by making it harder for them to get.
Tiki bar regular.
My code, never take anything for granted always expect the unexpexted.
Never take anything you don't need ,never want anything you can't have
Armed bystander's reaction in Ariz. shootings illustrates complexity of gun debate - The Denver Post
In fact, you don't even need a permit for concealed carry in AZ. How'd that help?
Um, she was actually there as security.2) in a church in colorado a woman with a pistol wounded the active shooter-he then killed himself
I think we'll need to see some links from now on....3) in another active shooter case at a school, teacher got a pistol and captured the shooter
Maybe....4) in cincinnati, a killer shot a woman jogging. a guy who had a loaded pistol in his car (a gray area since there was no CCW permit at the time) chased the killer down at gun point and took him prisoner until the cops arrived.
Folding stock and long shirt or coat? As it was he was armed with two 33-round clips.how would a guy with a 100 round magazine been able to get that close to Giffords?
What possible relevance?how was the Aurora shooter able to exit an emergency exit and come back in without alarms being sounded
I guess he assumed there would be guns or he wouldn't have been wearing head-to-toe body armor.why did he choose a gun free zone
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. ... It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
-- Adam Smith
When you start killing people, the police tend to show up.
You have never seen a beta mag have you? only someone ignorant would say you stuff it under a coat. It looks NOTHING LIKE a standard "banana" magazine which generally cannot function with more than about 40 rounds
Let me assume you have never carried an M16 under your coat