I have been on the receiving end of a county bureaucrat who just didn't like"rich" people. What got my attention was the 67 code violations. That sounds like harassment. I want to know from those of you who agree he deserved to be put in jail if that applies to all other administrative violations. Would you expect jail time for someone who has one more pet that the city allows, for example?
"The crisis will end when fear changes sides" - Pablo Iglesias Turrión
"Austerity is used as a cover to reconfigure society and increase inequality and injustice." - Jeremy Corbyn
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.
Yeah, white people don't have to put up with LAW BREAKERS in their neighborhoods and FINALLY government does something about. You got a point. I mean remember that horrible law breaker Martin Luther King Jr? He absolutely would not follow local laws and the protest marches and rallies were ILLEGAL, BROKE THE LAW and interferred with traffic for white people too. But the whimp ass government did almost nothing. Just one criminal charge each time. JUST ONE! Today the government knows what to do to LAW BREAKERS of local ordinances like MLK Jr to your satisfaction! You white people don't have to worry about law breakers like him again!
You'd be assured and pleased that they would have written him 125 citations, had police, code enforcement and the fire department repeatedly raid and search his house, then fine him so much they take the house. Your great government would ENFORCE THE LAW AND PUNISH THE LAW BREAKER MLK Jr. They would fine him so much he lost his house - the only thing they could do after he refused to have other law breakers over to his house. They would put him in jail for many months and then on probation for years so they could restrict his activities, prohibit him traveling, monitor all his movements and regulate you he may and may not speak to.
Your folks also today would know how to deal with that law breaker Rosa Parks too. The law clearly stated that negros sit in the back half of the bus. She knew that. It was made perfectly clear. The police even explained it to her before arresting her. BUT they only filed ONE charge against her. Your people would handle that better now. They would have made at least half a dozen charges against her - disobeying an officer, disturbing the peace, disorderly conduct, violating ordinances about bus travel...
And it is important to know who the good people and bad people are too. YOU, of course, are GOOD WHITE PEOPLE and YOU ARE ACTING ACCEPTABLE to the government. So you don't really have to follow all those code ordinances, there is no reason to raid or check out your house, and we all (wink wink) know you're one of the good guys. The local ordinances are how you good people take care of bad people. You cause no problems to government so you're ok.
Last edited by joko104; 07-13-12 at 07:47 AM.
When I worked at the theater I managed operations. Four times a year we were inspected for safety and health regulations to insure we were in compliance. We had 10 business days to correct any violations found unless written notice was provided to explain why a repair or correction would take longer. If we failed to get into compliance in 10 days the manager on duty during the initial inspection was fined (usually paid for by the company). If we did not respond in another allotted period of time the same manager could be subject to jail time.
That was here in Texas. I'm not sure how things work in Arizona by comparison, but I see absolutely nothing wrong or excessive about jail time if a business entity fails to achieve code compliance within a given amount of time.
All details reports suggest that this man was given several chances to meet code. Not only did he fail to do so, he acquired incorrect permits for the original structure, he classified his property as a church on legal documents and simultaneous lied about it being such when confronted by officials. The man's actions suggest a blatant disregard for law and a willingness to play the system to his own benefit.
Lastly, his actions are in no way comparable to the civil protest and refusal to comply with restrictive, racist laws that MLK Jr. promoted. This man was not fighting against injustice, discrimination, racism, or a lack of equal rights. He was violating the law for his own self-serving motivations. Any idiotic argument attempting to draw a parallel fails the minute it is used.
And PPS, this man is not being targeted because of religion. If he were running a counseling center, a day care, a car repair shop, or any other business out of his home he would still be obligated to comply with codes and regulations regarding health and safety. The "business" he chose to run is irrelevant.
"Hmmm...Can't decide if I want to watch "Four Houses" or give myself an Icy Hot pee hole enema..." - Blake Shelton
This didn't happen overnight.
Official Site of the City of Phoenix - Fact Sheet Regarding the Michael Salman CaseTimeline
Mr. Salman's interaction regarding his property dates back to 2006, when he was advised by the Zoning Administrator that his property was analogous to a church and required compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
During 2007, Mr. Salman had interaction with the City regarding his attempts to build on his property. The issue revolves around Mr. Salman's assertion that he is building a detached garage, when the building is actually to function as a church. Mr. Salman builds, despite not having a proper permit. On May 1, 2007, he is cited for, and eventually pleads responsible to building without the required permit. (Pleads responsible 7/18/2007)
In the Fall of 2007, Mr. Salman is notified several times by the City that he needs to obtain the proper permits and approvals before holding church services on his property.
In 2008, Mr. Salman's church, Harvest Christian Fellowship Community Church, is issued a Building Permit to construct a 2,000 square foot private game room accessory to an existing single family residence. The permit states, "Any other occupancy or use (business, commercial, assembly, church, etc.) is expressly prohibited pursuant to the City of Phoenix Building Code and Zoning Ordinances."
During 2009-2010 church services are held on Mr. Salman's property without proper permits and in violation of safety concerns. As a result, Mr. Salman is cited.
On January 4, 2010, Harvest Christian Fellowship Community Church is found responsible for 96 civil code violations. The Court notes, "[T]he State is not saying the Salmans can't run a church or have worship services at the location, but the State is saying that if they do so, they must do it properly and in accord with the building, fire, and zoning codes."
On August 30, 2010, Mr. Salman was found guilty of 67 Class 1 Misdemeanors. The Court stated, "Everyone is entitled under the United States Constitution to worship as they please. But there is a reason for these codes and that is for public safety. And that, I believe, is all that the State is asking is that the Code violations be rectified."
Mr. Salman appealed his convictions. On June 2, 2011, the Maricopa County Superior Court upheld the convictions and stated, "[T]he Defendant was engaged in public or church activities, and further that Defendant's convictions did not violate his Constitutional right to religious freedom."
The Court sentenced Mr. Salman to serve jail time. He was ordered to report to jail on June 18, 2012. The county jail relies on a Department of Public Safety table of criminal codes to confirm the basis for the incarceration when a person self surrenders. The table did not include the particular charge on Mr. Salman's confinement order. Mr. Salman was, therefore, not incarcerated. The table has been corrected.
On June 28, 2012, a Probation Revocation Arraignment was held alleging violations of Mr. Salman's sentence by twice having a gathering in excess of 12 people on his premises while not in compliance with all ordinances and failing to cooperate with the Court's Financial Screening.
" May you live as long as you wish, and love as long as you live"