It's true the US doesn't insist on the directly involved and friendly countries to play their part.
Having said that, it's absolutely necessary and prudent, to maintain an American military presence in the area to combat Iran's intentions, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States who are enemies of Iran should also be playing a prominent role as should the European nations.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
I thought you guys were all for Iran having their own nuclear weapons? After all its not fair if they don't, right? It's not a level playing field. That's the rhetoric I see here quite often.
More rhetoric from the left: When a Republican does something like this it's all about oil. Anything related to national security near the middle east and its all about the oil. Funny how I don't see this phenomenon any more since Obama's been POTUS.
Let the embargo work. Isn't that what liberals said about Iraq? Why not do that now? You can starve millions of people to death without firing a shot. This way the US can keep their service men and women from harms way and you still get to kill a bunch of them.
After all, liberals have touted the killings Obama has become quite noted for lately. Many of you celebrate it.
Or here's a novel concept: practice what you preach.
hers a fun fact,if yall hate bush so much,WHY ARE YOU SUPPORTING A DEMOCRAT FOLLOWING HIS POLICIES!!!!!!!!!!!!oh i see its only bad if someone with an (r)next to his name does it.
“You can lead a horse to water, but it is probably crowded with all those people you taught to fish.”