Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 117

Thread: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’[W:74]

  1. #61
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    07-23-12 @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    6,763
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Ikari, you are going to ignore my posts? Pathetic and disrespectful. You must have missed that class.

  2. #62
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,709

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Quote Originally Posted by reefedjib View Post
    Ikari, you are going to ignore my posts? Pathetic and disrespectful. You must have missed that class.
    Which post? The one that can be paraphrased as "what if magic?"
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  3. #63
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    07-23-12 @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    6,763
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Which post? The one that can be paraphrased as "what if magic?"
    I took some of my time to not be an imbecile and learn about the paper I found with Ikari's name on it. I suspect I found his thesis, although it could have just been the PRB article with his name foremost among the authors. Perhaps they rotate that privelege, as there were many other papers with the same names on them.

    My response to this effort was:

    Quote Originally Posted by reefedjib View Post
    Ok, fantastic, Tetsuo! あなたの知り合いを作るためにニース! A few comments come to mind, if I can recall them:
    1. Is the foundation/cause of the hydrostatic and shear deformation potentials, the binding energy of the exciton and the semiconductor brittleness, and the change in potentials, varying with indium, is -7 and -1.7 eV, respectively?
    2. I think this means "the effect of strain on the electronic structures of the dilute nitride semiconductor thin film structure" is that it can withstand shear and maintain the large, lower energy excitons which exhibit momentum of energy within the fine electronic structure, without transferring charge. Am I close?
    3. What is the speed of virtual photons through the structure?
    4. Is the momentum of virtual photons a vector?
    5. It is interesting that excitons have a long lifetime, isn't it?


    cheers,
    rasta

    ps. what would happen if Allah turns off beta decay?

    My final question does still stand, let me reask the question: "what would happen if somehow the beta decay function of the universe stopped working?"

  4. #64
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,709

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Quote Originally Posted by reefedjib View Post
    I took some of my time to not be an imbecile and learn about the paper I found with Ikari's name on it. I suspect I found his thesis, although it could have just been the PRB article with his name foremost among the authors. Perhaps they rotate that privelege, as there were many other papers with the same names on them.

    My response to this effort was:




    My final question does still stand, let me reask the question: "what would happen if somehow the beta decay function of the universe stopped working?"
    You're asking a physicist about what would happen if the laws of physics fundamentally changed. I.E. "What if magic?"
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  5. #65
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    07-23-12 @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    6,763
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Quote Originally Posted by reefedjib View Post
    My final question does still stand, let me reask the question: "what would happen if somehow the beta decay function of the universe stopped working?"
    Rejecting considerations, even if they do mention the supernatural, do not align well with the scientific method. I automatically suspect bias and political views regarding same. So we have scientists, with all the trappings, with closed minds. Super-duper!

  6. #66
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    07-23-12 @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    6,763
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    You're asking a physicist about what would happen if the laws of physics fundamentally changed. I.E. "What if magic?"
    Is there a Law which prevents that from happening?

  7. #67
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    07-23-12 @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    6,763
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    I refuse to believe Ikari is that rude therefore there is something else going on. I suspect that Ikari is bull****ting us about having a PhD in Physics. He's just another technical marketer...

  8. #68
    Sage
    Ikari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 01:05 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    54,124

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Quote Originally Posted by reefedjib View Post
    I refuse to believe Ikari is that rude therefore there is something else going on. I suspect that Ikari is bull****ting us about having a PhD in Physics. He's just another technical marketer...
    Your opinions are inconsequential to my degrees. I had to prove myself to my PhD committee, and I did. I have no need to prove anything to you. You don't have to believe that I have a PhD if you do not; it does not mean that I do not have one (in fact it's still here, even though you want to claim it's some form of BS). Your opinion has no bearing on reality whatsoever. Welcome to irrelevance. Population....you.
    You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo

    Quote Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
    "I should have loved freedom, I believe, at all times, but in the time in which we live I am ready to worship it."

  9. #69
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    07-23-12 @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    6,763
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    Your opinions are inconsequential to my degrees. I had to prove myself to my PhD committee, and I did. I have no need to prove anything to you. You don't have to believe that I have a PhD if you do not; it does not mean that I do not have one (in fact it's still here, even though you want to claim it's some form of BS). Your opinion has no bearing on reality whatsoever. Welcome to irrelevance. Population....you.
    Jackass. I asked you straight-up questions and you are unwilling to respond to them.

  10. #70
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,709

    Re: Scientists to unveil proof of ‘God particle’

    Quote Originally Posted by reefedjib View Post
    Jackass. I asked you straight-up questions and you are unwilling to respond to them.
    You asked a ridiculous and unanswerable question. If you're going to magically change the laws of physics, the results are going to be whatever your magic says the results will be. What if people could shoot lasers out of their eyes? Well, then people could shoot lasers out of their eyes. This isn't a physics question anymore. Using physics words doesn't make it a physics question.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •