- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,813
- Reaction score
- 2,233
- Location
- Huntsville, AL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You make the claim that you are liberal. That is sufficient evidence.I am? Support that. :coffeepap
You make the claim that you are liberal. That is sufficient evidence.I am? Support that. :coffeepap
I am not going there. Pearls before swine and all of that. It would be a waste of my time. And no one would be swayed. Least of all you. Nice try though.What is it, specifically, that Mr. Marx wrote that you deem radical?
You make the claim that you are liberal. That is sufficient evidence.
So, in post 309, you were lying when you said you actually read the article?
But that is the way to bet. Congratulations for not being on the left. I did say "not just you, but from most on the left..."
You have one example? Who do I believe? You? Or the one term Marxist himself?
No? Just a very large number of professors. I suspect that once one gets out of the sciences and engineering courses most are closet or professed leftists. Some are radicals.
This was just plain, old dumb. I cannot recall ever saying that those who seek higher educations are left(ists). But many of the people who teach at the university level are. My education is just fine. I have a masters degree is something that is not soft and squishy. Maybe that is why I am a senior engineering manager on a large program.
No. Just a former intelligence officer who connected the dots for nearly 20 years. But I would gladly emulate Glenn Beck if I had the talent to do so.
Emulate Glenn Beck? You'd be an alcoholic and drug abuser? Good call. :roll:
Hey, speaking of alcoholic, drug abusers, how 'bout that Obama doin' a little butt taggin with a gay man in his younger years, all to get cocaine....And you call names?
j-mac
That's calling names? Nope, it's stating facts.
Obama, like GB, can do as they please. I have no problem with either.
Now, do you have anything to add to the debate?
Are you saying that an alcoholic can be cured? Checked with AA on that?So you are saying that Beck drinks now, and abuses drugs?
So you are saying that Beck drinks now, and abuses drugs?
j-mac
Are you saying that an alcoholic can be cured? Checked with AA on that?
Are you saying that Beck has never abused drugs?
I don't know if he does now.
According to Beck himself, he is a recovering alcoholic. That means that he says he doesn't drink. As for drugs, I am not aware of any problem. But, that you do not know, but yet imply with a smear that he is in order to discredit his viewpoint, is text book Alensky, and totally disingenuous, it severely damages your own credibility to use such tactic.
j-mac
Are you saying that you didn't post what you posted?Where did I say that? Are you saying that Obama has never abused drugs?
This goes to the heart of why it is so hard for many of you to connect the dots.You said:
"The one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama surrounded himself with anti-capitalist, Utopian radicals.He surrounded himself with Marxists, communists, socialists, and all the rest of the left-debris that occupy our colleges and universities."
I invalidated your statement with the example of Robert Gates. He is a registered Republican.
If you are going to quote make an effort to get it right.Well if those professors are these "leftist, anti-union, anti-capitalist, communist, socialist, and Marxist Leftists" then they had to receive an education somewhere and the ones that teach are often higher educated, thus, it is logically consistent to deduce those "Leftists" are better educated.
You show who you are in your posts. I believe it is a good thing.Really? I doubt you were a former intelligence officer. Emulate Glenn Beck? You'd be an alcoholic and drug abuser? Good call. :roll:
This goes to the heart of why it is so hard for many of you to connect the dots.
If you are going to quote make an effort to get it right.
You show who you are in your posts. I believe it is a good thing.
First, I can tell you anything, doesn't mean it's true.
It's not a smear - it's a fact he abused drugs and alcohol.
Alinsky? As in Saul Alinsky? As in the radical leftist? Yeah, not a fan. However, the fact that you can't spell his name yet throw it out as an insult shows quite a bit about your character.
Are you saying that you didn't post what you posted?
First off, I couldn't care any less about what you think of MY character, you, a supposed "Libertarian" whom uses far left tactics in furtherance of his argument, then the most you can say in rebuttal when asked if you have any proof of your assertion that we shouldn't believe what someone says because they are an alcoholic, and drug abuser, is to highlight my spelling of your hero?.....pfft! :roll:
Yeah, next.
j-mac
Far left tactic? You mean like the one you used citing Obama with "butt tagging?"
The fact you can't spell his name yet throw it out immediately shows you don't really know what you are arguing but try to discredit your opponent by linking him with someone you do not approve of.
I never stated he was my hero. Strawman?
Glenn Beck is a recovering alcoholic and drug abuser? No?
Me? No, I wasn't there....But that is the allegation.
Who cares how his name is spelled, you obviously knew who I am talking about, and why. So, to come off as the spelling police is such an obvious fail, I can only laugh at your posting from here on out.
Nope, I did, because, well, you know....birds of a feather.
The alcohol? Yes, he even states as much. He is very open about it. Drugs? not so sure, at least I am not aware of that problem. So, what's your point? Beck turned his life around, so anything you disagree with that becomes fodder to use against him in a weak assed smear? Pathetic.
j-mac
But at the age of 30, Beck lost his passion for radio – and everything else – as he was consumed by alcoholism and drug addiction.
Are you saying that you won't answer the question?Why are you dodging?
"Dont shoot the messenger, right?" :roll:
Beck isn't an alleged ex drug and alcohol abuser. He is one. There's a difference in your allegation-based attack and my factual-based attack.
I know who you are talking about thus I am a fan of Alinsky? It's called being educated and knowing political thinkers, you should try it sometime.
Exactly. Strawman. Your fallacy is noted.
From his site: About Glenn – Glenn Beck
There it is - from the horse's mouth.
Are you saying that you won't answer the question?
Ok, I said he has talked at length about his alcohol problems. :shrug: So what does that have to do with what he says today?
j-mac