"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. ... It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
-- Adam Smith
But I take note that you dont dispute anything ive said in that post except to try to demean it...like every other single one of the teaparty lets screw everyone else cheerleaders on here....NONE OF YOU EVER DISPUTE what ive said in this post...because you cant its all fact...SO im good with you calling me a communist or anything else
[FONT=Arial Black]I think that the last 3+ years have shown that compromize means taking on R's concepts & having the R's condem the concept as being inspired by the Devil Herself i.e. Government Mandate.
If compromize is to mean adopting R's princibles, I say lets (D's) start sticking to our position for a change. That would be a change, D's supporting Democratic positions.
In other words effe compromise with the R's while we live under minority rule. [/FONT]
Last edited by jpevans; 06-11-12 at 07:50 AM.
Thank you, Quazi!