• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US economy added 69K jobs in May, fewest in a year

I think we should be doing a major stimulus in the form of federal/state infrastructure. I think it's a no-brainer ... but for the fact that Republicans would never let it happen (at least under Obama).
 
Well... it is not as easy as that... far from it.. which is why even the so called experts that are not partisan hacks (both sides) are seriously looking into revising the "rule of thumb" most politicians and media have been using for years.. because it simply does not fit any more.

There are 4.1 million births a year in the US. Now not all these 4.1 million make it to adulthood, and not all are fit enough for jobs and not all, especially women, go out and get jobs once they hit 16-18 and work all their life. Homemakers are still a large part of the female population, and since females account for about half the 4.1 million growth.. then..

There is also 1 million new immigrants (legal) in the US and that is a falling number.

Then you have to start subtracting due to deaths. How many of the 2.4 million deaths a year are under 67?

Add to this the 4 to 5 million people who retire each year and leave the work force, and how many of these were homemakers?

Basically it is not an easy number to calculate since the parameters change constantly.
If I were to discount everything I've heard until now. Dingbats would still be theory.
 
We're currently in a period of disinflation. Increases in prices are decelerating, as the U.S. economy and some major international economies are decelerating (some have moved back into recession). Certain prices have begun to fall e.g., commodities prices.



Averting the fiscal cliff will require renewal of significant portions of tax-side stimulus packages that were adopted in 2001 and 2003, among some other changes. Also, he didn't necessarily predict new rounds of fiscal and monetary policy stimulus. He suggested that a recession would "most likely emerge in the U.S." without such stimulus.

If I were to venture a guess, the Fed will not change its interest rates (repeatedly indicated by the Fed) and would probably try another "Operation Twist"-type arrangement rather than full-fledged quantitative easing if things remain on the current trajectory. Additional significant deterioration in Europe and the threat of spillovers/contagion would likely lead the Fed to take additional action that could include QE3, substantial swap agreements to assure liquidity in U.S. and international markets, temporary facilities, and other coordinated measures with the ECB and perhaps other international central banks. The recent notable deceleration in Chinese growth offers another possible macroeconomic shock, but developments in Europe appear to have the greatest possibility of triggering more aggressive monetary policy stimulus.


In terms of fiscal policy, 2012 campaign dynamics preclude any additional meaningful fiscal stimulus. I also expect that the U.S. will largely avoid the "fiscal cliff," but there will likely be no meaningful medium-term fiscal consolidation. Some smaller stimulative measures might be considered e.g., another renewal of the current reduced payroll tax rates, but those measures would likely be modest and relatively insignificant overall in macroeconomic terms.
Good post overall, but the bolded section may be the most troubling factor to consider when examining our fiscal future, if Obama or potentially Romney realize the necessity for a direct fiscal stimulus in the near future, the legislative opposition would be nearly insurmountable, handily preventing either candidate to enact measures of any significance. Sheer ideological opposition in the case of Obama, and Romney largely by external political pressures stemming from his own party.
 
Back
Top Bottom