• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New York lawmakers propose ban on anonymous online comments [W: 68]

sangha said:
That is clearly not true
Click to expand...

It is clearly factual. Abortion was a decision of the SCOTUS. We just replaced an adamantly pro life president with one equally pro choice, and what changed? Nothing.
Marriage is not a function of the federal government.
Tax increases have been passed when Republicans were in power, just as they have when Democrats were in power.
and both parties take bri.. I mean donations from corporations. They may mouth words about the situation, but neither one is going to do squat to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.
 
sangha said:
Actually, the only time I"ve seen that is when a rightwinger on DP admitted to firing employees because of their political opinions
Click to expand...

Well, you're gonna see a lot more of such un-American activity if this proposed NY bill becomes all the rage in legislatures across the nation.
 
Sig said:
Well, you're gonna see a lot more of such un-American activity if this proposed NY bill becomes all the rage in legislatures across the nation.
Click to expand...

No, we'll see the rightwingers engaging in un-american activity regardless of what happens with this piece of trash republican bill
 
sangha said:
No, we'll see the rightwingers engaging in un-american activity regardless of what happens with this piece of trash republican bill
Click to expand...


I love how the article names only the republican sponsors, with the lead in "among the sponsors of the bill are..." Quite the picture they paint for those like you taking the bait hook, line, and sinker....I'd be interested to see who the initial proposal came from...

j-mac
 
j-mac said:
I love how the article names only the republican sponsors, with the lead in "among the sponsors of the bill are..." Quite the picture they paint for those like you taking the bait hook, line, and sinker....I'd be interested to see who the initial proposal came from...

j-mac
Click to expand...

You know that j-mac's desperation is at an all time high, and his reading comprehension is at an all time low when he reads an article titled "New York lawmakers propose ban on anonymous online comments" and he wonders who proposed the bill
 
sangha said:
No, we'll see the rightwingers engaging in un-american activity regardless of what happens with this piece of trash republican bill
Click to expand...

Regardless, the important thing is that this bill gets thoroughly trounced and its supporters get chased out of office.

If the OWS crowd needs a fresh issue to reinvigorate the movement, this is it.
 
sangha said:
You know that j-mac's desperation is at an all time high, and his reading comprehension is at an all time low when he reads an article titled "New York lawmakers propose ban on anonymous online comments" and he wonders who proposed the bill
Click to expand...

No, I am saying that the bias is thick here. Look, I posted what the article says, and asked the question. Your snide BS is beside the point, and useless as any credible debate.

j-mac
 
j-mac said:
No, I am saying that the bias is thick here. Look, I posted what the article says, and asked the question. Your snide BS is beside the point, and useless as any credible debate.

j-mac
Click to expand...

yes, it's biased for the news to say that republicans proposed a stupid law when republicans propose a stupid law :roll:
 
sangha said:
yes, it's biased for the news to say that republicans proposed a stupid law when republicans propose a stupid law :roll:
Click to expand...

And here is where the lie is. You say it is the two named in the article that were the original writers of the bill? Well, that is not what the article says. So do you even know who wrote this bill?

j-mac
 
sangha said:
yes, it's biased for the news to say that republicans proposed a stupid law when republicans propose a stupid law :roll:
Click to expand...

Well, it is to harp on identifying the offenders as “Republicans” for supporting a proposed law that has nothing to do with what Republicans in general would ever support.

This isn't a Republican proposal. It's a New Yorker proposal, based on a kind of overbearing stupidity that has nothing to do with Republicanism, and everything to do with New Yorkism.
 
j-mac said:
And here is where the lie is. You say it is the two named in the article that were the original writers of the bill? Well, that is not what the article says. So do you even know who wrote this bill?

j-mac
Click to expand...

Bull ****e

The bill was proposed by two republicans. That's a fact. Deal with it
 
Bob Blaylock said:
Well, it is to harp on identifying the offenders as “Republicans” for supporting a proposed law that has nothing to do with what Republicans in general would ever support.

This isn't a Republican proposal. It's a New Yorker proposal, based on a kind of overbearing stupidity that has nothing to do with Republicanism, and everything to do with New Yorkism.
Click to expand...

Of course!! Bills that are proposed by republicans are not republican bills :roll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom